i once leaved you alone, but look at my posts you will find the fix(s).
Seriously... go away. Nobody likes you.
Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 87. (Read 284526 times)
Seriously... go away. Nobody likes you.
i once leaved you alone, but look at my posts you will find the fix(s).
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
Hi, for now mining with a banknode has some loopholes in the code were published and we are about to test some new rules to resolve this issue. But indeed yes, that would be how you do it on the actual banknode.
For user flexibility I am adding an extra feature :- the ability to mine using any wallet, so long as you own an active BN. i'll explain when i publish the code in a few hours.
Welcome back
Thanx for that option, I'm olnly dreaming that this will be more secure than running a bunch of hot wallets on different machines, but when it come that BN mining will be obligatory - please announce it clearly to avoid misunderstadning.
Seems that 32bit win wallet works ok on my "bcr-problematic" 64bit win 7 system when in the same time latest 64bit wallet doesn't work, strange but finally got some options.
EDIT:
It was premature happiness, it gives error at closing
"Runaway exception"
Bitcredit can no longer continue safely and will quit
EXCEPTION:St13runtime_error
CDB : Error -30974, can't open database
C:\...........\bitcredit-qt.exe in Runaway exception
The visual c++ error, after restart similiar errors.
eeee nevermind get back to the begining
bah i got mine synced to 207899 and it hung, so i restarted and got the same St13runtime_error so i deleted and moved some stuff in %appdata%, still no love. ended up deleted everything (except my fresh backups) so again it started fine and synced to the same block. suggestions?
Post a list of the nodes you are connecting to
Exactly !
So, from 53 BN's active, at most 53- 28 + 1 = 26 are mining.
So if you impose a limit that one BN can mine only one time @ 53/2 = aprox. 26 blocks, that is at limit. What if from the rest of 26 active BN's, there are another 3-4 BN's that are not mining? We STOP !
Same scenario could be theoretical possible if you limit @5 ... or other numbers.
So, from 53 BN's active, at most 53- 28 + 1 = 26 are mining.
So if you impose a limit that one BN can mine only one time @ 53/2 = aprox. 26 blocks, that is at limit. What if from the rest of 26 active BN's, there are another 3-4 BN's that are not mining? We STOP !
Same scenario could be theoretical possible if you limit @5 ... or other numbers.
BN mining could be made compulsory? If the limit was 1 in n blocks, you'd only need n BNs to get the chain moving again after an update - no big deal.
eg. 'banknode start' would automatically call 'setgenerate true 1'
I would have no problem with this.
I suppose there would need to be some sort of check by the network to verify that a BN was actually mining, to prevent modified clients NOP'ing the setgenerate call?
I can see no immediate/easy way to verify that a node is mining within the instant, but we can use a more advanced piece of lookback as part of the proof of service module.
We agree that once a BN is active it has at least one core dedicated to mining....tso we say that the longest a node should go without producing a blocky should be two cycles....which in BCR has been determined to be 900 blocks * 2.
So we then create a proof of service policy that looks back 1800 blocks and compares the lists, if a BN that has been active >1800 blocks but has not mined a block exists, then it gets marked as invalid and stops receiving payments, shortly there after it is dropped from the list.
If it will be made compulsory, in case of using cold wallet VPS, how will be treated BN local wallet, from which actual VPS BN wallet was started ?
If I will ocassionally mine on those local BN wallets just to mine some block at proper time, will it be ok or I'm just giving you some loophole ?
I'm trying to be honest, but changing this rules to compulsory makes a lot of difference for me, and what about idea of making Bigger Banknodes, this could resolve some problems if it would be 250k BCR for BBN, and I would not be the only one happy from it. Even if it happen then it would increase costs of running it 5-10 times, don't wanna even think about mining on all BNs permanently, it would increase costs 25-50 times !
Or anyone can suggests some reliable and reasonably cheap VPS services with 30 cores (1-2 for server and pure BN working, rest for BN mining) , 30GB Ram, 40GB SSD/HDD) , checked already on win and linux in both my case BN uses 1GB of Ram not 750MB like in your case, and you can't use all cores for BN mining permanently and to work it stable, you said that we are early adopters but there's a few of us and will be a lot more soon.
I know that hack is ready with his rigs, sorry I'm not ....
here is a link to the server i use and it is for sale!!!
http://cosprings.craigslist.org/sys/5233238829.html
buy it and end my mining!!! lol
doesntmatter
P.S.: did the wallet code ever get changed to mine different nonce for different threads...? last time i looked it still hashed the same number on all threads...
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
Hi, for now mining with a banknode has some loopholes in the code were published and we are about to test some new rules to resolve this issue. But indeed yes, that would be how you do it on the actual banknode.
For user flexibility I am adding an extra feature :- the ability to mine using any wallet, so long as you own an active BN. i'll explain when i publish the code in a few hours.
Welcome back
Thanx for that option, I'm olnly dreaming that this will be more secure than running a bunch of hot wallets on different machines, but when it come that BN mining will be obligatory - please announce it clearly to avoid misunderstadning.
Seems that 32bit win wallet works ok on my "bcr-problematic" 64bit win 7 system when in the same time latest 64bit wallet doesn't work, strange but finally got some options.
EDIT:
It was premature happiness, it gives error at closing
"Runaway exception"
Bitcredit can no longer continue safely and will quit
EXCEPTION:St13runtime_error
CDB : Error -30974, can't open database
C:\...........\bitcredit-qt.exe in Runaway exception
The visual c++ error, after restart similiar errors.
eeee nevermind get back to the begining
bah i got mine synced to 207899 and it hung, so i restarted and got the same St13runtime_error so i deleted and moved some stuff in %appdata%, still no love. ended up deleted everything (except my fresh backups) so again it started fine and synced to the same block. suggestions?
You miss this ... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12499961
Got it. working fine now, i can see the addresses and bids. Thanks.
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
Hi, for now mining with a banknode has some loopholes in the code were published and we are about to test some new rules to resolve this issue. But indeed yes, that would be how you do it on the actual banknode.
For user flexibility I am adding an extra feature :- the ability to mine using any wallet, so long as you own an active BN. i'll explain when i publish the code in a few hours.
Welcome back
Thanx for that option, I'm olnly dreaming that this will be more secure than running a bunch of hot wallets on different machines, but when it come that BN mining will be obligatory - please announce it clearly to avoid misunderstadning.
Seems that 32bit win wallet works ok on my "bcr-problematic" 64bit win 7 system when in the same time latest 64bit wallet doesn't work, strange but finally got some options.
EDIT:
It was premature happiness, it gives error at closing
"Runaway exception"
Bitcredit can no longer continue safely and will quit
EXCEPTION:St13runtime_error
CDB : Error -30974, can't open database
C:\...........\bitcredit-qt.exe in Runaway exception
The visual c++ error, after restart similiar errors.
eeee nevermind get back to the begining
@bitcreditscc
bidtracker.cpp is looking for the DASH unspents here:
http://api.blockstrap.com/v0/drk/address/unspents/Xypcx2iE8rCtC3tjw5M8sxpRzn4JuoSaBH - but their blockchain seems frozen at block 332319, which would explain why my later DASH bids are not showing.
Chainz will give you access to an unspent API call if you ask them (BCT user Fairglu seems like a good guy) for a free API key... just an option if blockstrap continues to be unreliable...
Blockchain.info seems accurate for BTC and LTC though.
bidtracker.cpp is looking for the DASH unspents here:
http://api.blockstrap.com/v0/drk/address/unspents/Xypcx2iE8rCtC3tjw5M8sxpRzn4JuoSaBH - but their blockchain seems frozen at block 332319, which would explain why my later DASH bids are not showing.
Chainz will give you access to an unspent API call if you ask them (BCT user Fairglu seems like a good guy) for a free API key... just an option if blockstrap continues to be unreliable...
Blockchain.info seems accurate for BTC and LTC though.
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
Hi, for now mining with a banknode has some loopholes in the code were published and we are about to test some new rules to resolve this issue. But indeed yes, that would be how you do it on the actual banknode.
For user flexibility I am adding an extra feature :- the ability to mine using any wallet, so long as you own an active BN. i'll explain when i publish the code in a few hours.
Welcome back
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
Welcome and Yes
ok well im syncing fresh i look forward to participating in the bids and mining on my 1 banknode. to start banknode mining "setgenerate true 1"?
One strange thing i'd like users to confirm for me : bidtracker/final.dat is showing zero values only in windows ? While linux users have accurate numbers?
This is mine:
Code:
LS18wropMM8VwT8YFiEZJE7LK8UdZVXXyE,0.000000
XyHvWG9iAhtmk31gMymsfdhuC1DQg1Sr8K,0.000000
XvwiNgZctKuiKCvnbFy2z3fBUqfWAyqNTb,0.000000
XmKJ7KmtrQr1E3dgvcbjbDVyZngRpH9aSg,0.000000
It's missing some addresses too, as seen here: My bid does show up in croutons dat though ... pretty cool
My (linux) final.dat looks like this right now:
Code:
1NFPKQdfigWdfGwZmhSZKomvoUYvJWUqW9,100000.000000
1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh,4000000.000000
1PEWVhJaaLYuhT8Nor4gVjKn9rDiCWJJEk,1000000.000000
1KgKG9SWSTUCqaC7kmaBFL87EUCsE7ot38,100000.000000
1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh,1000000.000000
1FkwyC42xdHHw3QEVgUfJg8ihVUfbxKaJB,1200000.000000
LS18wropMM8VwT8YFiEZJE7LK8UdZVXXyE,1235.300000
XyHvWG9iAhtmk31gMymsfdhuC1DQg1Sr8K,10534.380000
XvwiNgZctKuiKCvnbFy2z3fBUqfWAyqNTb,105343.800000
XmKJ7KmtrQr1E3dgvcbjbDVyZngRpH9aSg,105343.800000
You miss this ... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12499961
One strange thing i'd like users to confirm for me : bidtracker/final.dat is showing zero values only in windows ? While linux users have accurate numbers?
This is mine:
Code:
LS18wropMM8VwT8YFiEZJE7LK8UdZVXXyE,0.000000
XyHvWG9iAhtmk31gMymsfdhuC1DQg1Sr8K,0.000000
XvwiNgZctKuiKCvnbFy2z3fBUqfWAyqNTb,0.000000
XmKJ7KmtrQr1E3dgvcbjbDVyZngRpH9aSg,0.000000
It's missing some addresses too, as seen here: My bid does show up in croutons dat though ... pretty cool
My (linux) final.dat looks like this right now:
Code:
1NFPKQdfigWdfGwZmhSZKomvoUYvJWUqW9,100000.000000
1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh,4000000.000000
1PEWVhJaaLYuhT8Nor4gVjKn9rDiCWJJEk,1000000.000000
1KgKG9SWSTUCqaC7kmaBFL87EUCsE7ot38,100000.000000
1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh,1000000.000000
1FkwyC42xdHHw3QEVgUfJg8ihVUfbxKaJB,1200000.000000
LS18wropMM8VwT8YFiEZJE7LK8UdZVXXyE,1235.300000
XyHvWG9iAhtmk31gMymsfdhuC1DQg1Sr8K,10534.380000
XvwiNgZctKuiKCvnbFy2z3fBUqfWAyqNTb,105343.800000
XmKJ7KmtrQr1E3dgvcbjbDVyZngRpH9aSg,105343.800000
BCR is getting more and more attention, which is a (very) good thing! Especially when people - either good or bad willing - mention serious bugs that need fixing. The foundation of this coin is getting stronger and more solid every day, and the progress it has made as of late is simply amazing. I have a lot of respect for the team and everyone else supporting BCR, the amount of work and dedication put into this is immense! KUDOS to everyone involved, proud of you guys! 
Just a suggestion: Maybe instead of adding "-fix1", "-fixssl", "-fix1337", etc. it might make a bit more sense to add a number. So for example: 0.30.17.2-3 or 0.30.17.2-7, indicating a small fix.
Sorry, my bad. Seems that my curl compiled version was compiled without ssl support.
Windows 64 bit - 0.30.17.2-fixssl Download link: https://mega.nz/#!T11S1YIT!VDe4TZhtWZDv4y-7XW4q5a0vSCqdg03MwnhyvdtlKOA
Thank you!Windows 64 bit - 0.30.17.2-fixssl Download link: https://mega.nz/#!T11S1YIT!VDe4TZhtWZDv4y-7XW4q5a0vSCqdg03MwnhyvdtlKOA
Just a suggestion: Maybe instead of adding "-fix1", "-fixssl", "-fix1337", etc. it might make a bit more sense to add a number. So for example: 0.30.17.2-3 or 0.30.17.2-7, indicating a small fix.
Just a suggestion: Maybe instead of adding "-fix1", "-fixssl", "-fix1337", etc. it might make a bit more sense to add a number. So for example: 0.30.17.2-3 or 0.30.17.2-7, indicating a small fix.
I will from now on.
Is there any possibility somebody build wallet for windows 32x?
Windows 32bit 0.30.17.2 - Download Link: https://mega.nz/#!j89zSTDB!hjceIXvGuNSIRCYmOnu3K_Kf0S36X3WmyZ3gGwmKWfw
Thank you very much. Wallet starts without any crashing.
Just a suggestion: Maybe instead of adding "-fix1", "-fixssl", "-fix1337", etc. it might make a bit more sense to add a number. So for example: 0.30.17.2-3 or 0.30.17.2-7, indicating a small fix.
I will from now on.
Is there any possibility somebody build wallet for windows 32x?
Windows 32bit 0.30.17.2 - Download Link: https://mega.nz/#!j89zSTDB!hjceIXvGuNSIRCYmOnu3K_Kf0S36X3WmyZ3gGwmKWfw
One of the fellow devs i consult with when dealing with complicated things agrees that while my method is basic it can effectively reject consecutive blocks and also reject blocks not mined by BNs...
@ dragos_bdi we have to make the reward for mining small to avoid competition, but also not too small so that BN miners will not complain
@ doesntmatter We have many differnet people fro any different walks of life who will participate and use BCR as such the revenue streams are going to be diversified even further than now. "donations" are meant to be split everyday, except right now we are patching all the holes in the code, and unlike BTS ours are meant to be given out daily, not after some very long wait. The price is already set by those making "donations" as they are the ones who decide what the total will be divided by.
I find it very hard to believe that people would fail to have even $35 worth of starting capital. And in case they don't they should do a job and eran the starting capital, BCR offers jobs that pay right off the blockchain (this will kick in around block 210K. )
Blockchain based voting also starts at the same block. I may publish the ratings code too , but's it's still very dirty...
You are following the rules, except the fact that the rules left a loophole which allows you to subvert paying out to those who made "donations".
Let's me remind you why your mining is important to me.... it's not how much you earn that concerns me, it's the fact that i will count the blocks that have been mined by a key belonging to you and that will heavily influence your credit and trust rating. See a system is more likely to reward a regular , contributing user than a new user with no point of reference. The blocks attributable to you, the better your preferential treatment in the system. Hell, we could even set up zero tx fee regime for the ones with highest trust ratings. When i finish making the building the foundation of the system (likely 0.30.19) i'll start pushing hard on things like p2p loans, real banking facilities and transactions insurance. That is when all the electricity and BNs you own will really shine, people look at the trust engine in it's current state and think that's it, they could not be further from the truth. as i rummage in the code i am learning new ways to extract data from the system. Like now, i can calculate exactly what % of the system's overall health is attributable to an address you own, i can calculate accurately what % of the system would belong to you if we divvied it up based on economic activity. I'd say that right now the engine is 0.01 % of what it will be when i feel satisfied.
If we had more coders to write, review and roll out sections of this, i bet we'd have a full system in 3 months.
@ doesntmatter We have many differnet people fro any different walks of life who will participate and use BCR as such the revenue streams are going to be diversified even further than now. "donations" are meant to be split everyday, except right now we are patching all the holes in the code, and unlike BTS ours are meant to be given out daily, not after some very long wait. The price is already set by those making "donations" as they are the ones who decide what the total will be divided by.
I find it very hard to believe that people would fail to have even $35 worth of starting capital. And in case they don't they should do a job and eran the starting capital, BCR offers jobs that pay right off the blockchain (this will kick in around block 210K. )
Blockchain based voting also starts at the same block. I may publish the ratings code too , but's it's still very dirty...
You are following the rules, except the fact that the rules left a loophole which allows you to subvert paying out to those who made "donations".
Let's me remind you why your mining is important to me.... it's not how much you earn that concerns me, it's the fact that i will count the blocks that have been mined by a key belonging to you and that will heavily influence your credit and trust rating. See a system is more likely to reward a regular , contributing user than a new user with no point of reference. The blocks attributable to you, the better your preferential treatment in the system. Hell, we could even set up zero tx fee regime for the ones with highest trust ratings. When i finish making the building the foundation of the system (likely 0.30.19) i'll start pushing hard on things like p2p loans, real banking facilities and transactions insurance. That is when all the electricity and BNs you own will really shine, people look at the trust engine in it's current state and think that's it, they could not be further from the truth. as i rummage in the code i am learning new ways to extract data from the system. Like now, i can calculate exactly what % of the system's overall health is attributable to an address you own, i can calculate accurately what % of the system would belong to you if we divvied it up based on economic activity. I'd say that right now the engine is 0.01 % of what it will be when i feel satisfied.
If we had more coders to write, review and roll out sections of this, i bet we'd have a full system in 3 months.
Are you guys saying my banknode will stop working in a few days? So I will have to set up 5x50k banknodes?
Yes, the plan is to separate different types of nodes without excessive cost for smaller business plans. Actual banks will definitely be costly though , this will likely pop up in the next updates.
will the req. for actual banks be 250k? or possibly more?
Actual Bank will be 250K, the next few weeks will see some new ideas and further expansion of existing ones put into reality.
So what's the point of making new smaller 5x 50k banknodes from so far existing 250k, just for some time and then again remade them to 250k. Now 250k - after 145000 block, 5x50k - and after some time again 250k.
I know that there will be new functionality in actual bigger banknodes but if I don't want to use it, just hold a bigger 250k banknode which is easier to operate then 5 smaller 50k banknodes.
Sorry to say but it's illogical for me, maybe I don't get a bigger picture but it will not encourage any investors.
@ thelonecrouton
New wallet with light theme is at last useful and looks gorgeous, new functions looks promising, great work.
what purpose do you want to use your node for?
It depends how this project will evolve, lending money should be registered operation as far as I know and now without darksend working, this coin is not anonymous, how operator could feel safe ?
You said there are plans to register working company that would be interesting.
Yes, once we hammer out the last remaining issues, we will put up a mailing list and send a slightly redacted copy of the Memorandum to all interested users.
Darksend is still very immature. With regards to regulation, we are still consulting a lawyer , but essentially, if those running financial services work under our banner as a "branch", it may be feasible...more on this when i have the full recommendation. The main problem is that this is global, as such with differing laws in each country...we'll need to do some legal acrobatics
We want to minimize the risk to users as much as possible so we are really trying to get as iron clad as possible, also because of widespread scamming we are trying very hard to create a robust system that will hopefully ensure that no-one absconds with people's funds.
@doesntmatter
You got a few months of posts to catch up, but I think it doesntmatter
and when you are moaning same things over and over , then you got enough of yourself Thanks god that I write slowly , and tone down everything for a few times ...
well, you have never had a million of anything... if the second house is made shit wouldn't matter because I have made houses scarce because no one will sell theirs for less than 1 mil...
supply and demand... so far, i am the only one to create ANY demand!!! I did the only PR for this coin EVER!!!
The only one to create any demand? There's been plenty of demand from me and I've never heard of you until now. And have you seen the amount of work bitcreditscc has put in? That has no value I suppose, all the demand was created by you. supply and demand... so far, i am the only one to create ANY demand!!! I did the only PR for this coin EVER!!!
I spread this coin to ypool. I created the only facebook link. My involvement got the dev a little help in the beginning... Where were all of you in Jan, Feb, and March??? no one was complaining about my use of electricity then...
Wish I'd heard of BCR earlier! Where have you been for the past 3 months when all this was being publicly discussed and implemented? It works more like free drinks at the bar... Everyone at the bar gets free drinks, but i tip, so i get more drinks more often... you want more drinks, tip better...
you think it is just about cost... but it is more about difficulty...
No idea what you're talking about here.you think it is just about cost... but it is more about difficulty...
what you are doing is accepting Commodities for Other commodities... I hope you have spoken with a lot of lawyers... because any transaction done this way violates United States treaties, and requires about a million dollars in licenses... Without an international commodities license this tactic will end you up in jail...
It's a great idea, just costs alot... BTS got around it by using the term DONATIONS.... AT LEAST LEARN THIS!!!
you can't have "BIDS" for your "COMMODITIES" without it being said that you "sell"... can i get your license number please? do you login from your ip??? to buy something from you in the USA i need a lot of information to NOT BE BREAKING THE LAW!!!
doesntmatter
Panic much? If we have to change a few strings based on region, and incorporate in Angola, then so be it. If you have any legal expertise, feel free to share! It's a great idea, just costs alot... BTS got around it by using the term DONATIONS.... AT LEAST LEARN THIS!!!
you can't have "BIDS" for your "COMMODITIES" without it being said that you "sell"... can i get your license number please? do you login from your ip??? to buy something from you in the USA i need a lot of information to NOT BE BREAKING THE LAW!!!
doesntmatter
At the moment all we're doing is selling our own product and accepting 3 other currencies as payment. You could even call it barter. Where exactly is that illegal?
Jump to: