Shoot. Did it come back alive after that? Or was it just dead.
And what version?
If you are unsure git describe will tell you.
Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 9. (Read 355577 times)
From logfile-errors.txt
File "bitHopper.py", line 294, in
main()
File "bitHopper.py", line 290, in main
eventlet.sleep(60)
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\greenthread.py", line 30, in sleep
hub.switch()
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 177, in switch
return self.greenlet.switch()
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 226, in run
self.wait(sleep_time)
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\selects.py", line 35, in wait
r, w, er = select.select(readers.keys(), writers.keys(), readers.keys() + writers.keys(), seconds)
ValueError: too many file descriptors in select()
From logfile.txt
[01:41:27] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds
too many file descriptors in select()
File "bitHopper.py", line 294, in
main()
File "bitHopper.py", line 290, in main
eventlet.sleep(60)
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\greenthread.py", line 30, in sleep
hub.switch()
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 177, in switch
return self.greenlet.switch()
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\hub.py", line 226, in run
self.wait(sleep_time)
File "C:\bithopper\c00w-bitHopper-559b772\eventlet\hubs\selects.py", line 35, in wait
r, w, er = select.select(readers.keys(), writers.keys(), readers.keys() + writers.keys(), seconds)
ValueError: too many file descriptors in select()
From logfile.txt
[01:41:27] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds
too many file descriptors in select()
I´m with version 0.2.4.9-32 and getting a LOTS of : (with v.0.2.4.9-27 too)
· [blockexplorer] Error ´´
and
· [poolblock] [bitp] ERROR (´pident.artefact2´,´xxxxxx´) and hash NONE
And I got bitp disable...
****
Edit: I think something is wrong with the p2pLP votes, BCLC doesn´t mine any block since a few days, GUILD is mining others blocks that doesn´t belong to it because i count the number of shares that i send in every round there and in long rounds i send the double or more than in rounds that last less than 43.5%... and if I multiply those shares to 0,000028483126 (ARS-PPS), I´ll get a lot more bitcoins there.
· [blockexplorer] Error ´´
and
· [poolblock] [bitp] ERROR (´pident.artefact2´,´xxxxxx´) and hash NONE
And I got bitp disable...
****
Edit: I think something is wrong with the p2pLP votes, BCLC doesn´t mine any block since a few days, GUILD is mining others blocks that doesn´t belong to it because i count the number of shares that i send in every round there and in long rounds i send the double or more than in rounds that last less than 43.5%... and if I multiply those shares to 0,000028483126 (ARS-PPS), I´ll get a lot more bitcoins there.
Did you guys read this? 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/save-namecoin-from-double-spend-attack-now-20-profit-pool-up-43669
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/save-namecoin-from-double-spend-attack-now-20-profit-pool-up-43669
thanks MaGNeT, nice to know we have ppl working on protocol security
leever: There was a bug with the error output display. Can you update to the latest version and see what error appears?
Both .2.4.9 and .2.4.8 yield that error. Running on Windows 7 with the recommended python install...
What version are you using?
I should also ask why I might be getting this type of reject rate from slush:
4454 / 3754
84.28%
Might running 5 GH through a single instance of the proxy have anything to do with it?
4454 / 3754
84.28%
Might running 5 GH through a single instance of the proxy have anything to do with it?
I had a similar issue when running that much power through the proxy.
I should also ask why I might be getting this type of reject rate from slush:
4454 / 3754
84.28%
Might running 5 GH through a single instance of the proxy have anything to do with it?
4454 / 3754
84.28%
Might running 5 GH through a single instance of the proxy have anything to do with it?
From logfile-errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bitHopper.py", line 289, in
main()
File "bitHopper.py", line 284, in main
bithopper_instance.log_msg("Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds\n%s") % (str(e))
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %: 'NoneType' and 'str'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bitHopper.py", line 289, in
main()
File "bitHopper.py", line 284, in main
bithopper_instance.log_msg("Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds\n%s") % (str(e))
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %: 'NoneType' and 'str'
leveer can you post what exceptions appears?
And versions are just git tags. So if your are pulling you'll be on the latest version.
And versions are just git tags. So if your are pulling you'll be on the latest version.
Proxy shuts down periodically, with this coming at the end of both log files:
[21:55:06] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds
Any advice?
[21:55:06] Exception in wsgi server loop, restarting wsgi in 60 seconds
Any advice?
I just had getwork spam again on current version 
only using phoenix miners
only using phoenix miners 
if you have the hopper scrolling with rpc requests... are you using cgminer? cgminer above 1.61 has been causing thisw.
I also had this problem about a week ago when I tried it out, it would run fine for a couple of hours, then it would start flooding the screen with mumbo-jumbo and stop doing useful work. Does the problem still persist with cgminer 2.0? Any chance of this getting fixed?
if you have the hopper scrolling with rpc requests... are you using cgminer? cgminer above 1.61 has been causing thisw.
I would like to add my voice to issues hopping with 2.4.8. Last night, it refused to hop between BitClockers and MTRed despite both being <43%
EDIT: .. and just watched it ping-pong between Eligius and MTRed with MTRed being >49%, and Eligius as my backup pool, so something is... odd...
EDIT: .. and just watched it ping-pong between Eligius and MTRed with MTRed being >49%, and Eligius as my backup pool, so something is... odd...
Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too. 
wait, what? I'm using just mine on it, am I behind the times?Ah, I could be - I've been busy on other related projects lately.
Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too.
wait, what? I'm using just mine on it, am I behind the times?
Anyone have any up to date info on Polmine? Did they end up doing the bcp-like taxing hoppers thing they were going to do, and do they still delay stats? I'm hopping them on mine_deepbit atm, and things look ok from my side, but if I can optimise the hop-point I'd like to. And I'm sure you'd all like me to, too.
Jump to: