yes, what about this one?
Looks like a winner, IF that is they are still using prop.
Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 99. (Read 355689 times)
yes, what about this one?
Looks like a winner, IF that is they are still using prop.
yes, what about this one?
phatK 2.1 is better than diablo's kernel for most people right now
the guiminer will do that every single solitary time you close it.
just remember to change it back to 8337
and I guess c00ws newest version is punishing the lazy
I guess i will have to cut all that extra crap in user.cfg
edit: nope cleaned up user.cfg and still get the same problem.. so what is up?
the guiminer will do that every single solitary time you close it.
just remember to change it back to 8337
and I guess c00ws newest version is punishing the lazy
Code:
[23:30:38] Database Setup
[23:30:38] writing to database
[23:30:38] Selecting scheduler: SliceScheduler
[23:30:38] Server change to arsbitcoin
[23:30:39] slush: 1954459
[23:30:39] Error in pool api for slush
[23:30:39] btcpool24: 5008443
[23:30:39] Error in pool api for btcpool24
[23:30:39] triple: 1293320
[23:30:39] Error in pool api for triple
[23:30:40] btcserv: 1147431
[23:30:40] Error in pool api for btcserv
[23:30:40] bloodys: 329585
I guess i will have to cut all that extra crap in user.cfg
edit: nope cleaned up user.cfg and still get the same problem.. so what is up?
I hope everybody isn't completely sworn off Bitclockers - they've found 4 blocks today.
And look who one of their top workers has been:
gnaget are you hopping them or riding 247?
Hasn't been a bad time to be 247, tbh.
Also, I've been running with Cherry Picker on more and more rigs for the last day or so. BitClockers doesn't seem to block, delay, QOS, etc. using CP. Interesting data point.
And look who one of their top workers has been:
gnaget are you hopping them or riding 247?
Hasn't been a bad time to be 247, tbh.
Also, I've been running with Cherry Picker on more and more rigs for the last day or so. BitClockers doesn't seem to block, delay, QOS, etc. using CP. Interesting data point.
I've been hopping them with mine_friendly.
Quote
My miner output as in..
in guiminer view console.. watch for your gpu to cut out.. copy and paste what it say in the console.
as for AOCLBF.. dont know, havent played with it enough
if you are using AOCLBF due to the new phatk.. he refixed it to work with guiminer.
Ok, I'll switch back to guiminer.
I'm actually using this version of phatk - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/further-improved-phatkdia-kernel-for-phoenix-sdk-26-2012-01-13-25860
Is the other guys version better (2.1 right?)
EDIT: To answer my own question, yes it is.
Ok, back up and running. Couldn't connect to guiminer at all for a while until I noticed it had changed itself to port 8332 and solo mining for whatever reason. Changed that stuff back (took a few goes to stick) and we're back up and running. Will monitor for dropouts and post the output if it happens again. Ta
EDIT2: Ok, found the culprit (I assume):
2011-08-03 13:22:40: Listener for "Hopper2": [03/08/2011 13:22:40] Connected to server
2011-08-03 13:27:06: Listener for "Hopper2": [03/08/2011 13:27:06] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
2011-08-03 13:27:10: Listener for "Hopper": [03/08/2011 13:27:10] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
2011-08-03 13:34:17: Listener for "Hopper": [03/08/2011 13:34:17] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
2011-08-03 13:34:22: Listener for "Hopper2": [03/08/2011 13:34:22] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
2011-08-03 13:34:59: Listener for "Hopper": [03/08/2011 13:34:59] LP: New work pushed
2011-08-03 13:34:59: Listener for "Hopper2": [03/08/2011 13:34:59] LP: New work pushed
2011-08-03 13:35:14: Listener for "Hopper": [03/08/2011 13:35:14] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
Quote
My miner output as in..
in guiminer view console.. watch for your gpu to cut out.. copy and paste what it say in the console.
as for AOCLBF.. dont know, havent played with it enough
if you are using AOCLBF due to the new phatk.. he refixed it to work with guiminer.
@simonk83, and your miner output was... ? useful to know
My miner output as in... the hash rate? Sorry, noob here, be gentle
Or, if you mean the pool I was connected to and the flags etc, I'm using AOCLBF (although I was using GUIminer with the same issue), connected to bloody's at the moment, using Phoenix with -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false
can someone tell me whats wrong with this api
[btcmp]
name: bitcoin minepool
mine_address:rr.btcmp.com:8332
api_address:http://btcmp.com/
role:mine
api_method:re
api_key: id="field_shares">([0-9]+)
api_strip:' '
url:http://btcmp.com/
[btcmp]
name: bitcoin minepool
mine_address:rr.btcmp.com:8332
api_address:http://btcmp.com/
role:mine
api_method:re
api_key: id="field_shares">([0-9]+)
api_strip:' '
url:http://btcmp.com/
Maybe it's missing some of the relavant HTML: like the end of the table header?
round shares:
...
can someone tell me whats wrong with this api
[btcmp]
name: bitcoin minepool
mine_address:rr.btcmp.com:8332
api_address:http://btcmp.com/
role:mine
api_method:re
api_key: id="field_shares">([0-9]+)
api_strip:' '
url:http://btcmp.com/
[btcmp]
name: bitcoin minepool
mine_address:rr.btcmp.com:8332
api_address:http://btcmp.com/
role:mine
api_method:re
api_key: id="field_shares">([0-9]+)
api_strip:' '
url:http://btcmp.com/
Anybody know why i always get so many (was money, freudian mistake ) stales at slush? my ip is whitelisted with them...
New c00w version seems to be fixed, earlier version (4days) had a problem while switching between bitparking and random btc pool (phoenix miner/bithopper only reqeusting work)
First thought it was the same problem with the newer version, but it was the LP problem. Newest pull seems to work so far, will lookout for the Namecoin problem again and for a hoppersden invite?
) stales at slush? my ip is whitelisted with them...New c00w version seems to be fixed, earlier version (4days) had a problem while switching between bitparking and random btc pool (phoenix miner/bithopper only reqeusting work)
First thought it was the same problem with the newer version, but it was the LP problem. Newest pull seems to work so far, will lookout for the Namecoin problem again and for a hoppersden invite?
@simonk83, and your miner output was... ? useful to know
EDIT: Ok, forget that for now, new problem. My gpu's seem to be dropping out every so often (every few minutes), then reconnecting. Any idea what'd be causing that? Only just started happening as far as I'm aware.
EDIT: Ok, forget that for now, new problem. My gpu's seem to be dropping out every so often (every few minutes), then reconnecting. Any idea what'd be causing that? Only just started happening as far as I'm aware.
Mine started doing that with the latest update and then eventually would spew a huge error and everything would die. See my error in my post above.
what does changing the payout on the /stats page do even?
estimate efficiency
what does changing the payout on the /stats page do even?
just type bithopper.py
should work
works everywhere i install it
or use the whole path
when you put python in front it is using the python dir as the open dir.
this is what i use right now due to the new slicing
copy and paste that into a text file and save it as a hop.bat
should work
works everywhere i install it
or use the whole path
when you put python in front it is using the python dir as the open dir.
this is what i use right now due to the new slicing
Code:
bitHopper.py --scheduler SliceScheduler
Same error for some reason. Bah.
EDIT: Ok, forget that for now, new problem. My gpu's seem to be dropping out every so often (every few minutes), then reconnecting. Any idea what'd be causing that? Only just started happening as far as I'm aware.
something broke with the new LP, use a previous version until it's looked up
Error from bitHopper:
I think it may be conflicting with poclbm aswell. I get this error on poclbm as soon as bitHopper crashes:
poclbm and bitHopper are running on the same computer. Never had this problem with previous versions.
Code:
[Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames):: [ >]
]
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 397, in _continue
self.unpause()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 363, in unpause
self._runCallbacks()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 441, in _runCallbacks
self.result = callback(self.result, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 949, in gotResult
_inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
------
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 893, in _inlineCallbacks
result = g.send(result)
File "/home/djex/bitHopper-c00w/work.py", line 66, in jsonrpc_lpcall
body.deliverBody(WorkProtocol(finish))
exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'deliverBody'
[Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames):: [ >]
]
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 397, in _continue
self.unpause()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 363, in unpause
self._runCallbacks()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 441, in _runCallbacks
self.result = callback(self.result, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 949, in gotResult
_inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
------
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 893, in _inlineCallbacks
result = g.send(result)
File "/home/djex/bitHopper-c00w/work.py", line 66, in jsonrpc_lpcall
body.deliverBody(WorkProtocol(finish))
exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'deliverBody'
I think it may be conflicting with poclbm aswell. I get this error on poclbm as soon as bitHopper crashes:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 532, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 484, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
File "/home/djex/BitcoinMiner.py", line 328, in longPollThread
self.queueWork(result['result'])
File "/home/djex/BitcoinMiner.py", line 207, in queueWork
if self.lastBlock != work['data'][48:56]:
TypeError: list indices must be integers, not str
Exception in thread Thread-2:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 532, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 484, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
File "/home/djex/BitcoinMiner.py", line 365, in miningThread
data = np.array(unpack('IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII', work['data'][128:].decode('hex')), dtype=np.uint32)
TypeError: list indices must be integers, not str
poclbm and bitHopper are running on the same computer. Never had this problem with previous versions.
just type bithopper.py
should work
works everywhere i install it
or use the whole path
when you put python in front it is using the python dir as the open dir.
this is what i use right now due to the new slicing
copy and paste that into a text file and save it as a hop.bat
should work
works everywhere i install it
or use the whole path
when you put python in front it is using the python dir as the open dir.
this is what i use right now due to the new slicing
Code:
bitHopper.py --scheduler SliceScheduler
Um. I think if you install 32 bit python, twisted, and openssl it works on 64 bits windows.
Maybe I've got 64bit python installed... I'll have to check. The OpenSSL egg just gave me a path error when I tried to install it.
Yeah, I couldn't get 64bit versions to work, either, but 32bit works just fine.
Ok, 32bit Python seems to have allowed Openssl to install, that's good
Now though, when I go to start bithopper.py, I get:G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper>python bithopper.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bithopper.py", line 26, in
from client import Agent
ImportError: No module named client
Jump to: