Topic: Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable? - page 3. (Read 5039 times)

What does that mean?  What "different channels" did you "go to?"



Any chance you can share a screenshot of the email?



Care to elaborate on this?  What did you do that you should not have done?

---

I don't remember the exact number, but they were offering a very generous deposit match (or claimed to.)  It was something like $5k IIRC.  It seemed rather suspicious to me when I first saw it, like they were deliberately trying to lure-in the greedy fish.

---

Lol, look for a 1xBit signature dope who was also tagged by Royse777, and we'll probably find out who this alt belongs to.

And look how they conveniently disabled the option to comment on their tweets, perfectly knowing what would happen. This is a very shady practice that is rarely used, especially not if you are offering some service like they do.





That's probably because you tagged their accounts for promoting 1xbit so now they want you to do the same with Royse.

Why don't you start by tagging Royse777 using your real account instead of rushing in here with sock puppet accounts trying to push your own agenda through me?

Must I comment on anything that comes up? You have no right to dictate on what I should do in this forum, moreover through sock puppet accounts. I will comment or get involved when I want.

Have some balls (or boobs) and create a new reputation topic about why you are unhappy with me or anyone, and stop derailing this thread. And please, you can use your real account. I don't tag people unreasonably.

Lol... yeah sure, a shit show like them giving away $10k just like that - not even with stolen money would they do that.

What more evidence is required to convince us that Bitlucy is nothing more than a scam cansino? Even worse than 1xbit, as I've never heard of a single instance in which 1xbit required a customer to complete KYC! Bitlucy is requesting tie 3 KYC documents, which I'm certain no customers who value his privacy would provide.

Rose777 knows more than we thought, and I'm sure she/he knew they were broke from the start of their signature campaign.

They even copied the content on their sites and their ToS.

It's almost same and they only edited few words like the casino, amount, jurisdiction etc and added few more rules, I'd say that's 95% identical. Does this included as a red flag? considering how shitcoin projects that copied other project whitepaper are worthy to leave negative tag.

3 days before, they're conducting $10,000 giveaway

How much did you deposit to this very new site? And why?

It's not even their Terms, they took the Terms from another site.

As unfortunate and true as that might be, they should at least have the players' deposited amounts and should have no issues returning those funds at the very least.


You can check them all at the bottom of their website, I haven't archived them or anything but hope they don't change it overnight.

Another interesting statement ..

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60269810


I don't understand how they made that claim of having no pending withdrawals when there are players who are waiting for the withdrawals since earlier.

How come they have the time to promote the casino but not able to solve the problems? Are they expecting more deposits from new players to pay the old players and if that's true it will be a never-ending Ponzi-style casino.

Players should not have to fill the google form in the first instance because that's unprofessional and strange. What about the players who don't know about bitcointalk? How would they complain and similarly, players from China won't be able to fill the form because google services are inaccessible in their country from what I know and there might be other such issues. Problems on the website should have been settled either via email normally.

ok, I get it.
But I can't understand why they chose a campaign manager like him who is already accused of much shady behavior.
I expect Royse777 will overcome this situation well.

Sorry, bitlucy.com is actually up and running again, the audacity is incredible!

Riobet has been around for a very long time - since 2014 to be exact. They definitely are not related to Bitlucy.

I just suddenly woke up with this issue, a really very big issue.

But 1 thing I want to know, is there any possibility Bitlucy turned off their service and came up with a new name like RIOBIT or something else?

let me know if I'm wrong.

It's Lauda mot Luda, he is a male not a female, and if you are so well aware of events that happened few years ago, why are you hiding behind this newbie alt account(s) instead of using your main account.
You should also stop spamming every thread started by Royce with your ''warning posts'', he did some things in a wrong way but he is not Don Corleone or Al Capone.

Please stop with this charade.
Royce is certainly not a thief, and I never saw a single proof for your claims of some mysterious thief criminal ring in this forum.
On the other hand, bunch of newly registered account all starting to post here is very suspicious, to say at least.

Shady af - the literal scam - a shame Royse... Sorry for your loss.

I just thought I would add to this,

I am one of the 4 people who have filled out the form.

I had a $21k balance at one stage with Bitlucy.com.

I have been literally BEGGING the owner of the casino to withdraw the money, for around 2 1/2 weeks. I then received this email yesterday:

After being asked to wait you decided to go to different channels but it never resolved anything.

According to our terms and conditions 9.9, 9.10, 9.11, 9.12 we have the full right to ask you for KYC.
9.9 Bitlucy reserves the right to check a player's identity (KYC procedure) prior to processing payouts and to hold withdrawals for the time needed to check the player’s identity.
9.10 It is the responsibility of the player to ensure that all documents as a part of the KYC process are genuine. In case of false personal data provided by the players, the withdrawal will be refused and the user account will be terminated. The player will be informed thereof by email. In case of the faked or fraudulent documents provided will result in confiscation of deposits and potential winnings of the player.
9.11 Player’s identity check may require a selfie, a selfie with a note to the casino, a phone call or verification of a player via live video call (Skype), copy of government Identification, passport, and recent utility or cable bill.
9.12 If location or identity verification is requested, we will make every effort to facilitate your completion of this by email. If it is not completed within 14 days of the initial request, the funds will be retained by Bitlucy.

If we are happy with the KYC then the settlement will be following, the initial deposit returned to your wallet. Confirm that you are fine with returning to the same wallet.
You will no longer be available to play at our site and your account will remain suspended.

Please provide us a selfie with a note “Bitlucy and current date”.

Provide your phone number and a copy of your passport or national ID card. With the picture of your passport or national ID card please have the note visible too in the same frame.
Add a note on the side of the documents saying "BITLUCY KYC "

Of course, I am not going to provide them with my personal data. Based on evidence that they are a scam. Who knows what else they are up to?

But please, take note of this 'If we are happy with the KYC then the settlement will be following, the initial deposit returned to your wallet. Confirm that you are fine with returning to the same wallet.'

They did not even offer to pay out the winnings, only my initial deposit.

Roysee/Bitlucy. You are scum.

Also, I went in on him last night, said and did some things I shouldn't have, and now the website no longer exists. Hopefully no one ever deposits another penny.

I agree with you to some extent and admit that perhaps this is not the place to raise a side issue that deviates from the main idea of ​​this topic.
But you can imagine how these members did not miss an opportunity to attack the fraudulent projects, so it would be suspicious for them to remain silent in this way only because one of their friends is involved.

Just to clarify, this is an alternative account that I use to express my opinion, and I have never been a party to any scam project, nor have these members given me an evaluation of any kind, including Royse himself. I use this account to express my opinion because I am afraid that my original account will be tagged if I use it and I will lose my reputation only because one of them can take advantage of his trusted position to harm my reputation just because he may not like my opinion.

All my respect examplens.

can you both stop this nonsense?
I guess you're angry because your original accounts were tagged by these users, but this is not the place for this. open a new topic and express all your doubts there (best use your main accounts).
after all, Royse has already been tagged by several DT members because of the Bitlucy problem, I don't see why it is obligatory for these three members to be involved.

I think between logfiles _BlackStar JollyGood and Royse777 are close friend and have special relationship how keep hidden each other if become scammer. It is possible that some of them have received a commission from Bitlucy so that until now there has been no response, not even a single comment on this tread. Especially for JollyGood he is immediately active when giving red trust to members who join the 1xbit campaign without giving warning first, but when  scams happened to bitlucy he was a thousand languages ​​and not at odds with 1xbit.

I really hoped to hear the opinions of each of the members, logfiles _BlackStar JollyGood especially since they used to race to monitor fraudulent projects and defend employees against thieves and scammers.
I honestly don't understand why they ignore Bitlucy's situation even though one of their friends is involved with it.

In the face of this silence applied by the members who we used to see defending the right against fraudsters, and with their complete disregard for what is happening with Bitlucy, contrary to what we saw in their reactions with other fraudulent projects, the rule in this forum has become as clear as the sun..

- Create an account on the forum.
- Manage some projects to get everyone's trust.
- Add trusted members to your trust list. They will add you in turn.
- Now all you have to do is wait for an opportunity to be assigned to a big project or launch it yourself because your reputation is the guarantee that no one will verify its seriousness and your friends on the trust list will of course support you.
- Collect as much money as you can, and it doesn't matter that you lose your reputation because you've got enough in return.

I think everyone here remembers Luda and that great project that she worked on in her last days before leaving the forum. Does anyone remember how much money that project collected and about the fate of the investors after the project became forgotten? Has anyone ever thought about the members who joined the project just because they trusted Luda?
Almost the same scenario has been repeated over and over again, and the current example with Royse777 and Bitlucy is nothing but another piece in a big puzzle of thiefs who can manage things using bitcointalk forum.

This is only tip of the iceberg. How many people that are not registered on this forum are waiting for withdrawals? Ten? Hundred? Thousand?

Just confess that bonus abusers devastated bitlucy wallets and bitlucy dont have funds to cover withdrawals, but you are trying to find funds and fix that. Instead of blaming abusers and bitcointalk members being hard on bitlucy.