Topic: Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable? - page 6. (Read 5039 times)

Thanks for the mention (notification), I was approached directly by the CEO of BitLucy which isn't Royse 777 for a promotion program in which the reward system was to be determined by the mode mentioned in the bounty thread. This communication came after he notice my involvement in their signature campaign. After several consideration by my participants we decided to go for it but when we noticed it won't be successful, we stop the very end of first week. A poll was taken for this to happen and an announcement was made for the closure of bounty; https://t.me/BrainbossBountyGroup/45690.

It's quite unfortunate that Royse 777 is in such an ugly situation because I have worked with him severally and noticed his sincerity. We ones carryout a charity program together and worked on several of his signature campaign which he has always paid. I hope you pull through this as I believe if you are in a better position, you would had resolved all this.

I just went through the thread, looks like it opened on May the 1st and closed on May the 10th with no announcement from CryptopreneurBrainboss. He would be the only 1 who may actually know what happened, but I think he should have at least made an announcement somewhere.

Hey Bislom, is there any way to chat with you on Telegram? I know the owner of BitLucy and would like to talk with you about it?

BitLucy.com stated their forum journey on the 23rd April. On the 24th April, Royse777 has confirmed that he is the Co-Partner & Marketing Director of BitLucy and the CEO is his good friend. He also confirmed he has small share with BitLucy team.

---

Nothing went well until now. Royse777 has made the announcement of BitLucy.com in the forum. He ran BitLucy signature campaign as a manager. But all on a sudden he said that he isn't going to work as representative of BitLucy


In the meantime, we have seen several complaints against BitLucy. They ran signature and avatar campaign, Royse777 hired many reputable forum member to wear the avatar and personal text of BitLucy. Royse777 said that he is a good friend of the CEO. All of us expecting to see the solution of those issues and giving more chance to Royse777 as he is a reputable forum member. He should have worked here as a representative until the issues are fixed.

BTW, They also ran a bounty campaign and closed it in the middle: {STOP} BitLucy Casino Bounty Campaign | 4 weeks | Budget: 15% Revenue in Bitcoin. Does anyone know what happened with that bounty campaign?

I probably won't be able to log in the forum for the next 24 hours or so.

For one thing, I had a good opinion of Royse777 before this and would like to get this resolved and remove his tag. I think there are many of you who have expressed a similar opinion.

But on the other hand, my gut tells me that when things like this happen, this may just be the tip of the iceberg.


I read your post history and found it interesting how accurately you predicted how it would all end. But this is a forum, and your word alone is not proof of anything.

Do you know anything about the bounty campaign I mentioned above?

One point making this whole thing an even bigger mess is that in the beginning, we were "told" that the CM was simply taking care of the bitcointalk promotion, with no word about being directly involved and/or having any share with the operation.

Now, we read things about "just a small share"... this is worrying, besides stating one would keep "helping" such an operation, it does not matter if on bitcointalk or outside of it, a scam operation remains a scam operation and when you have not been executing payments for weeks, you are a scam, full stop.

Apparently, people have lost money - they deposited, requested withdrawals, and never received those - not a rocket science, I have no idea how the CM or anyone else dared justifying such a BS over such a long period of time.

Very sad story really and so predictable. :/

Proof it.

A team can be made out of 3 people.

Proof it and I'll tag him (her?) myself.

Royse777 is not only representing bitlucy, he is the CEO from it. He did this project with 1-2 other people. There is no "team".
Royse777 thought he could be rich very quickly with stealing deposits and not pay out.
I warned people in the first days already this site is scam and Royse777 can not be trusted. He is a DTM (Default Trust Muppet) and abuses his status.
its good that the site is closed on the forum, before more victims will come up.

I didn't see this Bitlucy drama until yesterday, when OP posted in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! So I haven't read everything yet.

I just read through this guy's post history. What surprises me, is that Bitlucy was only online for a few days after registration, and didn't address any of the problems.
Running a casino is usually very profitable. "100% deposit bonuses" are usually designed to require enough wagering to make it EV- for the player. That means the casino should earn money, which means they don't have to scam users.
Not being able to withdraw $1000 makes it look like they're broke.

Did Bitlucy ever show proof of bankroll?

@Royse777: davidr_22 posted his withdrawal problem on May 25. Instead of addressing it, you started the Avatar campaign the next day.

Obviously we can only see what happens in public, and what I see doesn't look good.

Can you comment on the one withdrawal issue I cherry-picked above?

I don't think he's going to find this topic.

This is a terrible excuse to delay withdrawals. If you update software, at least process or transfer the existing withdrawal requests.

I feel the same.

This is always the risk of "lending" your reputation to promote something.

---

---

If they're truely willing to resolve all problems, I'd say the way to do this is by giving full transparency. Start by providing proof of funds, create a public list of all complains, and resolve them. All this doesn't have to take more than a day.

Someone who knows more than me about bounties can help check if what this person says is true or is lying?


The thread in question is this one, I think:

LunaLand FLY ME TO THE MOON [Bounty] 💰🕵🏻‍♂$15,000 in LLN🥳

People who have a grudge against Royse777, like bounty cheaters, can take advantage of these moments to tell lies about her, but also after the last events, I think it's worth checking things like this.

No, that was not what was supposed to happen. Whoever I talked to over the chat said they will post an update to reassure the community that withdrawals are being processed and things are finally looking good. We can all see how that went...

Wow, I've managed to miss that (I badly need more coffee!). Sorry.
Still, I urge those with problems fill something, anything in that form. That's because:
* one can make his own topic or post in this very thread and post the link into the form; it's not in the designated topic, but at least it's there
* one cam post in the form and write into the form that the thread is locked; it opens the door for further discussions (the wording "Please be detailed so that I do not need to approach to you for more details." may mean that if needed, Royse777 or the casino will contact the user, right?) and at least there's an entry in the form before the time limit.

I think that Royse777 closing the thread was a hasty move, not deliberate to stop users telling their problems, since it gives him more work to do. At least this is how I see the things.

I've already said above whith a screnshot that that form says that people have to previously explain their case in the locked thread. So, I don't know how they are going to do that.

From what I know, Royse777 is not really "the" owner of that casino. He said yesterday:


Even more, in the last 2 or so months (maybe more) Royse777 was no longer as active as usual on the forum, probably caught in a lot of things.
The current situation with BitLucy most probably made the things worse as free time so I'm not sure how open he will be to spend time with you (no offense, I'm trying just to prepare you).
So my advises are:
* if you have open issue with BitLucy make sure you've filled the google form; today is the last day for that (!) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60373594
* try to get his attention and hope that he will contact you
 ** PM is an option, but please don't send more than one nor set your hopes too high, since some may have newbies blocked
 ** writing down his name correctly in a post may trigger notifications if he has them set up

If you've posted your situation into the form and it got handled (good or bad), it would be useful if you tell us too.

I don't think so. Send him a PM to see, although he's not very often online. I think he's someone's alt account, so if he reads this maybe he'll send you a PM.

I have nothing personal against Royse777, and when I acted in support of the flag and with the feedback, I explicitly said that it is subject to review, as usual.

But I also believe that there have been no more red tags or flags because of the previous reputation and because she has given lots of jobs in campaigns to many people in the forum. In fact, there has not yet been an opposition to the flag nor a neutral tag in her favor.

Closing the Bitlucy thread ahead of schedule, when those who had the problems with withdrawals there were supposed to explain it in that thread before filling in the form doesn't look good to me.

I would like to hear more opinions from DT on this topic, especially from those of you who are more neutral, as it is clear that there are many of you who have a clear empathy for her.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt, I can think that she somewhat got caught in the middle of this.

But I would also say that if this case were to happen with a campaign manager with less experience and less previous reputation she would have a lot more red tags.


I hope this will happen, and when done, let's remove the tags and call it a day.

Hi guys, first post here. I was wondering if anyone has the Telegram of user ''Bislom'' ? He claimed to know the owner of Roysee and I would like to talk to him, have some information (chats and much more)

My issue is he has claimed to be part of the team but now to save face has posted he is going to stop promoting them on this forum once wd(valid) are paid. What about off forum? Yes our feedback should be reserved for this forum, but it does talk about his character and trust if he continues to help promote or be a part of that casino away from this forum.

I have tagged the Bitlucy account but really am considering more.

I hope it all works out for him as well. I personally have nothing against Royse. If they cannot or will not fix issues, I hope he has enough sense to walk away.

I hope that everything gets cleared up, I'm rooting for you.  I can only imagine how emotional this has been for you and the BitLucy team.  My only hope is that they are indeed a trustworthy group of folks and haven't taken advantage of you and your reputation for their own gain.


I've been in communication with Royse777, and he's not done trying to get everyone refunded.  We'll see how things transpire.


Obviously people on both sides of BitLucyGate have gotten emotional.  Those waiting for their withdrawals have justifiably gotten impatient, and the BitLucy team has taken all the discussions quite personally.  I would love nothing more than to see everybody settle down, resolve the issues, and resume business as it should be.  Hopefully we'll have a good outcome before the story is over.

It looks like it.

Besides, in cases like this, whenever I have seen those we have asked for explanations to blame us, things have not ended well. It is very typical.


I also tagged Bitlucy but it's useless because they are not going to come back here.




If you go to the form you'll see that whoever has a problem first has to explain the problem in the ANN thread, which Royse777 has locked a few hours later.

I'd guess that the (few?) cases written until tomorrow into the provided google form will be handled and, if it's the case, honored...
At least that's what Royse777 wrote here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60373594


There may be. It won't be easy to get the things right. And it'll probably be costly, in a way or another (money, time, reputation...). I hope I'm wrong.


It depends whether they honestly want to have a working business or it's just another hit and run.

------
Edit: I've just found this part, which sounds.. interesting; maybe the problems will be actually handled correctly, maybe only patience is needed? We'll see.