-snip-
Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.
I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.
In my opinion, continuing to promote through a signature campaign while the website has not recovered to the initial stage of their launch is not a profitable thing for them, it is very possible that it will be a waste of money. We may know that one of the goals of the signature campaign is to increase awareness of the members of this forum about Casino that held signature campaign and also attract new players. Maybe they will hold a signature campaign again, especially if sportbetting is active again on Bitlucy because sportbetting is also one that attracts many players.
As far as I know Royse777 stated that the signature campaign is on hold because they are undergoing experimentation, probably to get the best out of the budget allocated to it. If it doesn't meet the target, it needs to be stopped or paused, then think of another approach to hit the goal. I don't think it is a matter of budget but rather the marketing team is still figuring out the best approach to promote the casino.
We are still experimenting our marketing.
It wasn't a smart idea to let Royse777 post the flyer either, it feels like he's abusing his DT status in this way.
What? I don't see Royse777 abusing his DT status. I see it as being responsible since I think he is part of the marketing people of Bitlucy