Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitmain introduces the Antminer S17 Pro, Antminer S17, and the Antminer T17 - page 26. (Read 11162 times)

member
Activity: 351
Merit: 47
So far I have gotten mixed information.  One contact says one version "assuming pro" is 67th.  Another s17 is 50th, and another is 45th.  So... no clue what the hell to think lol
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1561
CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang
I hope everyone who gives a darn about Bitcoin avoids doing business with Bitmain in the future. Bitmain has been a long standing bad actor in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. We shouldn't forget this just because they replaced their CEO.  As far as I know they have done nothing to undo the damage they've caused or otherwise make amends.  We can see by their continued open source license violations in their products that they haven't changed.

I will award merit to every post that makes a compelling statement against buying from bitmain.

They tried (and failed) to block access to the S11/S15 (if i recall correctly) via SSH, i think they didn't like someone making a full open source firmware replacement for the S9, that uses actual cgminer instead of bmminer...

I have also been following the products released by MicroBT, and have been rooting for them. Their 16nm part (the M10) was already nearly as efficient as Bitmain's 7nm part. Now they have a 12nm product, the M20, which is looking seriously efficient already. Can you imagine what they can do at 7nm?

Lets not forget about Jihan Wu's attempt to seize Bitcoin, by rejecting Segwit and promoting giant blocks which ended in the creation of two altcoins nobody wanted, but hurt the market (and ironically his company)...

And then there are the pools. It was bad already that they had one large pool, but why 3? or is it 4? Antpool, btc.com, viabtc... when you use those pools you are benefiting Bitmain one way or the other, yet there is way too much people who don't seem to care. Could it be because its the default in their miners?

Does anyone remember the covert asicboost drama? and the rumors of them using it indoors? They always denied it, until overt asicboost became real, somehow their S9 models could do it, but not their previous models. So the rumor was proven correct after months of denial...

Of course there are several reasons not to pick a Bitmain product, more importantly the Asic market is weakened by that behemoth. I understand that a former Bitmain employee went to MicroBT, the Asic designer? Somehow i think both Bitmain and Canaan copied the PSU driving things at 20v with metal rails directly attached to the boards from MicroBT, but that's just my speculation...

For me, MicroBT should be the preferred choice, but keep an eye to Canaan Creative, which needs to lower prices to be more attractive.

Many people are now angry with Bitmain for the sudden release of slightly improved versions, and then removing the "old" ones from their shop, making their investment sound pointless. Ie: the S11, the S15, now the S17. Is there a slightly improved S19 lurking around the corner? Will you commit 2k or more USD just to find out you bought an already obsolete model? Well we should be nearing the peak efficiency for 7nm parts, but i think MicroBT will win once they release something at 7nm.

Bitmain also has a strange business with those coupons. Not happy with making an alt (or two), they also instigated a parallel market of coupons. Why are they issuing those coupons in such quantities, that people are now more interested in trading than using?

I also remember their ability to disable miners remotely, there was a little scandal about this "feature", which was later "removed" (upgraded?).

Another one is the fact that the miners are set to mine to a Bitmain Antpool account by default, so any "tests" give extra profit for them. Wasn't there a class suit action going on because of it? Of course if you reset the settings, this returns.

In the end its just like the pools. If you keep using (their) large pools, you are weakening the whole thing. So by buying their products you also weaken their competitors. If competition disappears, and they consolidate a monopoly, we are going to be in trouble. They would ask outrageous prices, and give very poor customer satisfaction, because once you are the last one standing you can dictate your terms to others.

Oh almost forgot, why the heck does Bitmain owns not one, but TWO cloud mining services? I don't think i need to talk here about cloud mining, they are pure money waste, if not outright scam. Stay away from them...
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1706
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
So once all the March coupons expire tonight, then there will be miners again for sale on Bitmain's site, is that the deal?  Everything but the DR5 is sold out still, only hours until all those coupons expire.

Most likely, yeah.

Those coupon notification e-mails are really pissing me off.

I say Fuck their coupon policy.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 5
So once all the March coupons expire tonight, then there will be miners again for sale on Bitmain's site, is that the deal?  Everything but the DR5 is sold out still, only hours until all those coupons expire.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
I hope everyone who gives a darn about Bitcoin avoids doing business with Bitmain in the future. Bitmain has been a long standing bad actor in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. We shouldn't forget this just because they replaced their CEO.  As far as I know they have done nothing to undo the damage they've caused or otherwise make amends.  We can see by their continued open source license violations in their products that they haven't changed.

I will award merit to every post that makes a compelling statement against buying from bitmain.

Interesting offer.
I prefer my eight m10's over my 1 s15.
I just spent 2048 usd to preorder the M20 V1 72th 3312 watts.
Having opened and examined s15 pcb board  and M10 pcb board the m10's are built better.
That is why I pushed buying M10's over s15's.

Bitmain runs bitdeer and bitdeer is wrong.  it is terrible worse then hashnest which was also terrible.  I have a degree in accounting and my single biggest issue is no one audits bitdeer.  It is not that it is a ponzi it is that  no one gets to know which machine  is mining for you and that smacks of fraud.

How would you like to pay  for the s15  and its  60 watts a th cost  when in fact they are using a s17 with firmware mods  spending only 40 watts a th.  They simply don't address this.

so why help them by buying gear from them

the price for

s17 power is  6.68 cents a th or 6.45  reads two ways on the site or changed while I typed
s15 power is   9.70 cents a th   so there is zero audit done and an easy 3 cents a th a day to be stolen that is more then 3000 usd a day for 100ph of contracts

this is the single biggest reason to not support them.
as they do it right in front of your eyes with no shame  ie  what do they do behind the scenes when they  do this right in your face

staff
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382
I hope everyone who gives a darn about Bitcoin avoids doing business with Bitmain in the future. Bitmain has been a long standing bad actor in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. We shouldn't forget this just because they replaced their CEO.  As far as I know they have done nothing to undo the damage they've caused or otherwise make amends.  We can see by their continued open source license violations in their products that they haven't changed.

I will award merit to every post that makes a compelling statement against buying from bitmain.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
but I am power capped and that is what makes new gear attractive to me.

of course I turn a profit on those 20 s9's and I do not have to rush to buy 15 s17's  just one for evaluation works for me.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
I have 20 s9's doing about 250th and around 22kwatts  set to medium and to low
if they were all s17 I could do  15 x 44 = 660th and around 24kwatts

yup but you know those 15*s17 would cost you something close to 25k if not more , with that amount you can get about 90 s9s brand new 1290th ( almost double the hashrate) of course this excludes electricity factor.

that's why it's different for everyone, for someone like me who has free but limited power it makes no sense to be paying a fortune for S17, not even S11 justifies the cost, but the math will be totally different for someone who pays 10 cents per kwh and planning to have 5 gears in the basement.

i think in a few years when btc market become pretty stable and these mining giants get very close to fully utilizing the chips, and
when a 5% improvements is spoken of for a month, only then it will make sense to stay as close to the latest gear as possible, as for now to me it's always about getting your investment back ASAP and not worry much about what could happen afterwards.

not sure how others make their mining plans, would love to hear thoughts.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 129
Hmm, so If specs are true. S15 and T15 buyers are fucked up again. Huge different on same 7nm chip. I hope Bitmain will release some good firmware for S15/T15 which will increase performance.

I mean I remember I bought my 2015 Corvette...and every year since then Chevy has had the gall to produce a newer one. I hope i get an ECU patch that gives me free upgrades too!

P.S. The S17 uses a different chip than the S15

S15 = BM1391
S17 = BM1397

Direct blog quote from Bitmain:

Quote from: Bitmain
The new BM1397 chip requires lower power and can offer an energy consumption to computing ratio as low as 30J/TH. This is a 28.6 percent improvement in power efficiency in comparison with Bitmain’s previous 7nm chip, the BM1391.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
I have 20 s9's doing about 250th and around 22kwatts  set to medium and to low

if they were all s17 I could do  15 x 44 = 660th and around 24kwatts

So I do think  the gear has not been sold in high amounts yet.  and yet means a lot.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
I strongly agree phill, i did make a rough estimation on how many s15 are out there based on coupons circulation, someone said it was way off and far from accurate, tho i dare anyone to show me say 500 s15 coupons , while there are hundreds of thousands of s9 coupons out there, i have yet to find a single chinese supplier with say 1000 s15 for sale, everything points out to the fact that all the 7nm gears from bitmain did not have any high sales value, be it a production issue or economical limitation , that is something i do not know.   

Long story short, major farms have either left the game or still run profitable on old gears, the new gen miners are being sold in small quantities to people with super high power rate and very small scale business.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
... not sure if production is slowing down or they are just fucking around.

Hashrate is low compared to Oct 4

so lets pretend there are tons and tons of new gear in the hands of the big farms.

big farms run at 5 cents or better.

So I would say so far not that much gear is out there.

since 5 cent power turns a profit for any gear under 85 watts a th

that means the s9 set to lowest settings turns a profit of 59 to 66 cents a day at 5 cents
the m10 on high turns a profit of  2.40 a day
the s15 on high turns a profit of 2.64 a day
the t3 on high  turns a profit  of 4.17 a day

so 5 cent power still works  for even the s9  my guess is  there are not a lot of m10's s15's t3's out there.

or  a lot of s9's are fully shut down at higher cost locations.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 6279
be constructive or S.T.F.U
Hmm, so If specs are true. S15 and T15 buyers are fucked up again. Huge different on same 7nm chip. I hope Bitmain will release some good firmware for S15/T15 which will increase performance.

Keyword there is "again" s17 buyers will have to face the sane story a few months later, it has always been this way, lucky mining btc is less risky than alts, look at z11 improvements over z9, or look at x11 asics, it is even worse.

I have come to realise that the best asic is the one the ROIs faster regardless of effiecny , new gens will always most likely always have a longer ROI period.

Having said that we are uncertain of how many gears they will have to sell at this current low btc prices, they are now totally out of stock of all btc miners , not sure if production is slowing down or they are just fucking around.
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
At some point something better than the S17 will come and the cycle repeats again. S15, S11, S9, S7. Everytime a new generation comes, this story repeats. More surprising is you didn't expect this after so many years of the same. You could go back to the days of CPU mining, then GPU mining, FPGAs, the first ASICs, etc.

More importantly at these rates we are talking 32 watt/th... vs 47 watt/th the M20 (12nm) or 60 watt/th for the S15 vs 70 watt/th the M10(16nm). Also take into consideration that Bitmain specs are probably better than reality, we will have to wait for an actual review from members of this forum.

MicroBT is still at 12nm, they could probably still make something even better at 7nm. Frankly if the S11 and S15 are 7nm parts, they are quite disappointing, considering a 16nm chip nearly matched them. Maybe they planned to finance the refinement by selling those low yield units first, or maybe there is an S19 lurking around the corner, how to know?

my thoughts are :

the s15  does  

50 watts a th on low speed
60 watts a th on high speed

a 28% improvement =

36 watts a th on low speed
43.2 watts a th on high speed
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1561
CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang
Hmm, so If specs are true. S15 and T15 buyers are fucked up again. Huge different on same 7nm chip. I hope Bitmain will release some good firmware for S15/T15 which will increase performance.

At some point something better than the S17 will come and the cycle repeats again. S15, S11, S9, S7. Everytime a new generation comes, this story repeats. More surprising is you didn't expect this after so many years of the same. You could go back to the days of CPU mining, then GPU mining, FPGAs, the first ASICs, etc.

More importantly at these rates we are talking 32 watt/th the S17 (7nm)... vs 47 watt/th the M20 (12nm) or 60 watt/th for the S15 (7nm) vs 70 watt/th the M10(16nm). Also take into consideration that Bitmain specs are probably better than reality, we will have to wait for an actual review from members of this forum.

MicroBT is still at 12nm, they could probably still make something even better at 7nm. Frankly if the S11 and S15 are 7nm parts, they are quite disappointing, considering a 16nm chip nearly matched them. Maybe they planned to finance the refinement by selling those low yield units first, or maybe there is an S19 lurking around the corner, how to know?
full member
Activity: 303
Merit: 105
Some Chinese miners have already started talking about S17 being released next month, these guys are usually pretty accurate at least with the release date, they also dropped S9 price with psu from 395$ to 271$ for April delivery.

I am almost certain that next month will be the release of these monsters.

The S17 is expected to do 42TH at 1500w
S17 pro is expected to do  48TH at 1550w

The numbers on S17 seem very reasonable, in fact even 44th at 1500w is doable, not sure about the pro,it's a bit too much IMO. but let's see how it goes, will keep you updated if i get any confirmed information.

Hmm, so If specs are true. S15 and T15 buyers are fucked up again. Huge different on same 7nm chip. I hope Bitmain will release some good firmware for S15/T15 which will increase performance.
donator
Activity: 4718
Merit: 4218
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
We have our release date. April 9th.

legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7763
'The right to privacy matters'
The rumors were that the Gen 1 7nm process had terrible yields and that bitmain only had enough good chips to build a few thousand S15's, and due to the low yields they had to sell the machines below cost. It might be true. That would certainly explain the purchase restrictions on the first few batches, and short period of time they were available for shipment. I would imagine that the yields on the gen 2 chips will be at least as bad. For all the Gen 1 7nm they shipped, the network hashrate is still below were it was mid-Nov, and has probably been supported in large part by keeping older gear running via all the dyscalculia suffers that bought up those BitDeer contracts. But we shall see. If the price makes sense, and the specs pan out in the real, I'll be picking up a few S17's for the farm. If. When. Maybe.

That is funny.

BitDeer is pretty much fully written for bitmain's benefit.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 23
You know 7nm is not new to bitmain right? They have been playing with those for months now, i do not think production will be much limited, its more or less the price of both gears and btc that could get in the way of them selling the gears.

The rumors were that the Gen 1 7nm process had terrible yields and that bitmain only had enough good chips to build a few thousand S15's, and due to the low yields they had to sell the machines below cost. It might be true. That would certainly explain the purchase restrictions on the first few batches, and short period of time they were available for shipment. I would imagine that the yields on the gen 2 chips will be at least as bad. For all the Gen 1 7nm they shipped, the network hashrate is still below were it was mid-Nov, and has probably been supported in large part by keeping older gear running via all the dyscalculia suffers that bought up those BitDeer contracts. But we shall see. If the price makes sense, and the specs pan out in the real, I'll be picking up a few S17's for the farm. If. When. Maybe.
Pages:
Jump to: