Author

Topic: Bitmain's Released Antminer S9, World's First 16nm Miner Ready to Order - page 338. (Read 531297 times)

legendary
Activity: 4382
Merit: 9330
'The right to privacy matters'
I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.

For what it's worth, I've found ck to be a decent and helpful guy. Maybe a bit short sometimes, but not anywhere close to being a bellend like Kano.

And then there is Luke-Jr which is another level of crazy bastard altogether.


Yeah ck then Kano then Luke

Sort of 2  then 4 then 16

Shitty iPad does not do squared and cubed correctly .

I don't use Luke much at all.

I use ck and Kano quite a bit.


Also remember they are high quality programmers and every good programmer I have ever know was just a bit off center.  

Or maybe I am just a bit jelly of,the ability to be a high quality programmer as I do not have that skill set.
legendary
Activity: 872
Merit: 1010
Coins, Games & Miners
CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.

Nothing wrong with that. As old bastard in training, I respect the point.

[laughing]... so, where is the demarcation line between OB in training vs OB?
I am firmly in the OB category already, regardless.

The demarcation line is called male balding pattern: you have it? you're OB, you don't? trainee.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Yep. Honest and polite is the best way to go, but if you have to pick one always pick honesty.
legendary
Activity: 4382
Merit: 9330
'The right to privacy matters'
I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.



    
Based on the returns at the kano.is pool it looks to me like he practices honesty above manners.  I would like both  but in mining I prefer an honest impolite at times person over a dishonest polite person.

one thing is 100% sure about bitmaintech they do not practice honesty when it comes to software.

As they refuse to honor international laws about using software. BTW deep pockets and proper political connections may one they really hurt them on this.


They still sell good gear.  Which I purchased from them last week.


hero member
Activity: 723
Merit: 519
I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.

They may be egotistical bastards but I will always support their work and will only mine on pools running ckpool. These guys an an asset to the community, we cannot say so much about antpool.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 251
I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.

Meanwhile using CGMiner in your S9, lol.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
I've got about 40 S7 from various batches in hosting, so if I end up with any of them would save shipping cost. I'm working on a trade for a bunch of S5 but if I come up short I'll let you know.

I also will never mine on Antpool.
sr. member
Activity: 342
Merit: 250
I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!
Sidehack, if you need a 135 chip s7 to play with, looks like I'll have a couple spares after my s9 arrives  (limited power budget) so I can always send you one.

btw: if you need more s5's to strip for making Compacs I have 3 more I can send ya. Wink As for old farts.... Turning 60 here next mo right around the Halving.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Well, I have a unique background. My father is a jack-of-all-trades carpenter and the son of a civil engineer; my mother is an English teacher, the daughter of a math teacher and a telephone lineman (farmers both), so I grew up alternating between swinging a hammer and digesting classic Literature. Alongside my engineering and science degrees I took enough English classes in college that I'm one shy of a minor in writing - something I might complete if I can afford to get back in this fall.

Oh yeah, and hardware is overpriced. I'm looking forward to my S7LN getting shipped any day now, so I can play around with optimized undervolting. Might pick up some cheap 135-chip S7s after the halving and crank 'em down to baseline efficiency. If any of Hawkfish's machines in my hosting are still up for grabs by then we might strike a deal.

Probably won't have any 16nm gear of my own until I'm running stuff I've built myself. Don't really have the budget anymore for a $2100 miner, not when that's more than I paid for my old-enough-to-drink car.
legendary
Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004
Well, I just turned 30 last month so I don't think I qualify yet.

Wait a minute. You just turned 30 and you know how to write?

I don't know how you pulled that off. By your sense of grammar I thought for sure that you were at least in your fifties  Wink

Sorry for getting off topic. Returning to our regularly scheduled overpriced hardware thread...
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4656
Well, I just turned 30 last month so I don't think I qualify yet.

Since healthcare considers people under 25 as children...sure.
Brain development does not stop until we are 25, too.
The funniest age definition I ever encountered was with NIH, which considers people below 42 years old as "young" scientists.
Maybe it is up to 45 now, I just don't know.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Well, I just turned 30 last month so I don't think I qualify yet.
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4656
CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.

Nothing wrong with that. As old bastard in training, I respect the point.

[laughing]... so, where is the demarcation line between OB in training vs OB?
I am firmly in the OB category already, regardless.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.

Nothing wrong with that. As old bastard in training, I respect the point.
hero member
Activity: 895
Merit: 504
I am not going to quote above thread, getting too big. Now it is either S9 or nothing. Come July all of my S7s will not be almost worthless, once they are retired I would still be able to run my S9, 1 S9 will replace 3 S7s but still consume as much as 1 S7 and continue to contribute to the network. I pay 300x or 400x times more than it costs to make for an iPhone, I don't see it any differently.

Depending on the timing, maybe when you're ready to sell your S7s I'll buy them back from you Wink

Again, this is my preference, not an argument for how everyone should make the decision to buy or not.

I have 20 S7s from various batches at two colocation centers. I am willing to let them go now. If interested let me know.
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
I am not going to quote above thread, getting too big. Now it is either S9 or nothing. Come July all of my S7s will not be almost worthless, once they are retired I would still be able to run my S9, 1 S9 will replace 3 S7s but still consume as much as 1 S7 and continue to contribute to the network. I pay 300x or 400x times more than it costs to make for an iPhone, I don't see it any differently.

Really what this comes down to is that there's multiple ways to justify mining. I originally approached this as a hobby. After playing with Scrypt for fun (not caring about losing money) I used the BTC-in-BTC-out discipline and that worked well for me. I profited in BTC terms with every miner.

Then the S7 came out and I threw that discipline out the window. It was fun to have the latest hardware, but the fact that I could never get the BTC out that I put in bothered me. I ended up selling my S7s early to recoup fiat ROI.

On top of all this was the S7 B1 delivery delays, and corresponding compensation delays, because Bitmain planned badly. Instead of getting my units on time, they missed the shipping deadline and my S7s stayed in their data center hashing for them instead of me while the whole country was getting plastered for a week long festival.

All of this added up to me feeling like an idiot for stepping away from my discipline and yielding all control to Bitmain.

As much as I love the hobby and as much as I miss actively mining (it's addicting), this time with the S9s I'm not buying until it makes sense in BTC investment terms. If that never happens, I'll stick with old miners. Depending on the timing, maybe when you're ready to sell your S7s I'll buy them back from you Wink

Again, this is my preference, not an argument for how everyone should make the decision to buy or not.

Very well said.  I made more BTC than I paid on the S3s and the S5s (and Bitmain still made profit).  It wasn't until the S7 that I lost BTC, and like you, it was because I lost my discipline.  I wanted the big boy and rationalized it any way I could.  Just like folks are doing with the S9.

I do not believe Bitmain is under any obligation to sell miners at cost, but to sell them for at least approximately what they will generate.  I don't want people to confuse manufacture cost with mining revenue value.  Bitmain is essentially building a 2 BTC miner for 1 BTC and then selling it to us for 3 BTC because they can (not because they have to cover some sort of cost).  It blows my mind that people are defending this action and calling the purchase of that 2 BTC miner for 3 BTC a solid investment.  Let's just call it a cool purchase.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1865
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
legendary
Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004
I am not going to quote above thread, getting too big. Now it is either S9 or nothing. Come July all of my S7s will not be almost worthless, once they are retired I would still be able to run my S9, 1 S9 will replace 3 S7s but still consume as much as 1 S7 and continue to contribute to the network. I pay 300x or 400x times more than it costs to make for an iPhone, I don't see it any differently.

Really what this comes down to is that there's multiple ways to justify mining. I originally approached this as a hobby. After playing with Scrypt for fun (not caring about losing money) I used the BTC-in-BTC-out discipline and that worked well for me. I profited in BTC terms with every miner.

Then the S7 came out and I threw that discipline out the window. It was fun to have the latest hardware, but the fact that I could never get the BTC out that I put in bothered me. I ended up selling my S7s early to recoup fiat ROI.

On top of all this was the S7 B1 delivery delays, and corresponding compensation delays, because Bitmain planned badly. Instead of getting my units on time, they missed the shipping deadline and my S7s stayed in their data center hashing for them instead of me while the whole country was getting plastered for a week long festival.

All of this added up to me feeling like an idiot for stepping away from my discipline and yielding all control to Bitmain.

As much as I love the hobby and as much as I miss actively mining (it's addicting), this time with the S9s I'm not buying until it makes sense in BTC investment terms. If that never happens, I'll stick with old miners. Depending on the timing, maybe when you're ready to sell your S7s I'll buy them back from you Wink

Again, this is my preference, not an argument for how everyone should make the decision to buy or not.
Jump to: