Pages:
Author

Topic: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics - page 76. (Read 482537 times)

sr. member
Activity: 426
Merit: 250
/q/24hrprice * /q/totalbc  < /q/marketcap ?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Back in a second.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Been having problems with the JVM crashing repeatedly somewhere inside the native apache APR library. I'm pretty sure it is some specially crafted requests causing it. For now I have switched tomcat over to a different connector but this also required changing some SSL settings,

so if anyone is experiencing any SSL errors please clear your browsers cache and refresh the page.
full member
Activity: 222
Merit: 100
thank you.
one other thing, if I change the language to english, the settings page
is in german. I have also tried to delete all cookies but it does not work.
The settings page is still in english.

And please make it possible to set a hostname as ip restriction under the settings.
it is useful for dyndns if you have a static ip address you can use dyndns but it only
works with a hostname
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Never changed this code.
Since yesterday it does not work anymore.

Should be fixed now.
full member
Activity: 222
Merit: 100
Code:
https://blockchain.info/merchant/HEXKEY/payment?to=ADDRESS&amount=1000000&anonymous=false&fee=50000

Never changed this code.
Since yesterday it does not work anymore.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Am I the only one who had problems with the API withdrawal?
Only getting "Unknown Error"

With JSON RPC? Using which method and parameters?
full member
Activity: 222
Merit: 100
Am I the only one who had problems with the API withdrawal?
Only getting "Unknown Error"
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
There needs to be another way to set fees, I'm having an very annoying problem...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--143266

settxfee is now enabled in the JSON RPC api.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
I've set the 'Default Fee Policy' to 'Generous', but my transactions are still being send with 0.0005 BTC fee.
What's going on?
(I'm using 'Bitcoin-Qt Compatible JSON RPC', 'sendmany')
Quote
Your request (#1798) has been received and is being reviewed by our support staff.

To add additional comments, reply to this email or click the link below:
http://blockchain.zendesk.com/tickets/1798
The fee policy set in the javascript interface does not currently affect the API. However I have fixed this my development version and it will be fixed next update.
There needs to be another way to set fees, I'm having an very annoying problem...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--143266
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Hi piuk,

I noticed that the receive api callback from blockchain.info is no longer immediate. I was accepting zero-confirmation payments successfully up until maybe a couple of weeks ago. Here is an example of a generated address for which I'm still awaiting blockchain.info's response: https://blockchain.info/address/14TdZ3nRTcfLUkRUb8DUTXUZf8Pe6pPwEG

Did you make a change to the callback so it no longer responds immediately?

No, no changes have been made to the callbacks recently. Is it the both the forwarding payment and callback the callback which is being delayed or just the callback?

Could you add the ability to archive/unarchive multiple address at once?

Like a check box next to each address and a button to Archive/Unarchive those addresses.

The unarchived icons are pretty quick to tap for me. I can see a need to a checkbox for archive but the interface needs to be kept uncluttered at the same time.

I've set the 'Default Fee Policy' to 'Generous', but my transactions are still being send with 0.0005 BTC fee.
What's going on?
(I'm using 'Bitcoin-Qt Compatible JSON RPC', 'sendmany')

Quote
Your request (#1798) has been received and is being reviewed by our support staff.

To add additional comments, reply to this email or click the link below:
http://blockchain.zendesk.com/tickets/1798

The fee policy set in the javascript interface does not currently affect the API. However I have fixed this my development version and it will be fixed next update.

Is anyone else getting "Unrecognized search pattern" on every bitcoin address lookup?

This should be fixed now.

Also fixed a bug related to the "address contains a very large number of unspent outputs" issues.
 
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
Was just going to come here to post this.

Also on firstbits lookups.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1056
Affordable Physical Bitcoins - Denarium.com
Is anyone else getting "Unrecognized search pattern" on every bitcoin address lookup?

Yes.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
Is anyone else getting "Unrecognized search pattern" on every bitcoin address lookup?

legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
I've set the 'Default Fee Policy' to 'Generous', but my transactions are still being send with 0.0005 BTC fee.
What's going on?
(I'm using 'Bitcoin-Qt Compatible JSON RPC', 'sendmany')

Quote
Your request (#1798) has been received and is being reviewed by our support staff.

To add additional comments, reply to this email or click the link below:
http://blockchain.zendesk.com/tickets/1798
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
Could you add the ability to archive/unarchive multiple address at once?

Like a check box next to each address and a button to Archive/Unarchive those addresses.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
Hi piuk,

I noticed that the receive api callback from blockchain.info is no longer immediate. I was accepting zero-confirmation payments successfully up until maybe a couple of weeks ago. Here is an example of a generated address for which I'm still awaiting blockchain.info's response: https://blockchain.info/address/14TdZ3nRTcfLUkRUb8DUTXUZf8Pe6pPwEG

Did you make a change to the callback so it no longer responds immediately?

Thanks.

EDIT: FYI, I am using the anonymous payments option.
EDIT2: I finally got a response after 4 confirmations. How can I avoid this delay and get an immediate, zero-confirmation response?
hero member
Activity: 767
Merit: 500
I've enabled the profit/loss again now. It was disabled due to high load but things are a little more stable now.

Thanks for enabling this again. One idea, if you are getting high load, would be to require the user to click the Refresh button before the balance is calculated the first time; most of the time I don't need the profit/loss when I'm making a bet, but sometimes it's nice to see it.

Regards,

Will
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
Sorry Hazek, I did not get time to work on the charts this weekend. Unfortunately due to the downtime some other things had to take priority, like setting up a proper monitoring and alert system since pingdom isn't cutting it anymore. I don't have an ETA at the moment.

That's perfectly reasonable and I understand. I hope you can get to it soon, as always, keep up the good work!
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Hi,

I noticed that I no longer get a profit/loss result for satoshidice on blockchain.info - is there a limit to the number of bets or addresses for this functionality to be enabled - I found it quite useful Smiley

Will

I've enabled the profit/loss again now. It was disabled due to high load but things are a little more stable now.

Hey piuk, I assume the above didn't make it into your busy schedule for the past weekend but would you perhaps have a new ETA for it? Just curious..

Sorry Hazek, I did not get time to work on the charts this weekend. Unfortunately due to the downtime some other things had to take priority, like setting up a proper monitoring and alert system since pingdom isn't cutting it anymore. I don't have an ETA at the moment.
Pages:
Jump to: