Topic: Bounties are STUPID - page 31. (Read 4894 times)
it is more like a tradition to increase subscribers, build your community and make a hype. To be honest, without bounty no one would retweet tweets and subscribed and as long as other project have more subscribers, investors can simply skip this project with low audience.
I don't think like that, I think the role of a bounty hunter is very important in an ico. the investors will know the ico from the bounty hunters. we know that there are many types of bounty, not just the signature campaign. and I think with the many types of bounty then the promotion will also be wider and it makes a lot of investors are known about the project.
Yes we all know that, bounty campaign is one of good things to promote their ICO and gather a lot of investors. But of course there are some bounty hunters that taking advantage in other projects by using multiple account in one campaign, that's why the percentage of rewards the other participants are low.
Not really, there was a study I read somewhere that those who got small portion of tokens thru airdrops or bounties are most likely to hold them than dump them.
Most of the dumpers are those who bought big in the ICO e.g. whales.
Most of the dumpers are those who bought big in the ICO e.g. whales.
I also find it ironic that someone saying bounty campaigns are stupid is also wearing a signature. I hope that the poster is not participating in a signature campaign.
think about that too when i see signature put on below OP's post 
, maybe if he join bounty he will not sell it like investor do or maybe he is investor who loss their investment because of bounty hunters Creator of this thread also wear signature for some bounty, but he dare to criticize that.
Will you invest money into the new project and get tokens, or will you work everyday to
get the tokens is not same it`s up to each of us. I do both, I work for tokens and I invest
my own money, and let me tell you the ones I earned are much sweeter.
Bounties are not stupid, people work and harder they work more tokens they will get in
the end, it`s fair. Some people have skills, make videos, they organize their time and their
shares on social networks, they deserve to be paid, all of us for our contribution.
I don't think like that, I think the role of a bounty hunter is very important in an ico. the investors will know the ico from the bounty hunters. we know that there are many types of bounty, not just the signature campaign. and I think with the many types of bounty then the promotion will also be wider and it makes a lot of investors are known about the project.
Whattt, bounty are stupid 
Hey bro, calm down.
I think bounty is make me a rich without take off money first.
For know, i can buy a car and a house.
That all money i get in bounty campain.
Hey bro, calm down.
I think bounty is make me a rich without take off money first.
For know, i can buy a car and a house.
That all money i get in bounty campain.
I think they can be very effective for promotion as an Air Drop situation. If the team doesn’t have a lot of money then it helps in terms of promotion in exchange for the coin and its potential. It also helps in building a community that cares for each other.
But I guess for bigger projects it’s not all that important.
But I guess for bigger projects it’s not all that important.
The airdops project promotes the name of the project as well as the currency of the project to investors and the community of cryptocurrency. It is a pretty effective way if the coin of the project is listed on the coinmarketcap
I also find it ironic that someone saying bounty campaigns are stupid is also wearing a signature. I hope that the poster is not participating in a signature campaign.
think about that too when i see signature put on below OP's post , maybe if he join bounty he will not sell it like investor do or maybe he is investor who loss their investment because of bounty hunters I think it would be better if bounty participants may be given the option to just receive either btc or eth instead of the coin they are marketing. This is for the payment of their services. This is also to prevent the massive dumping of the bounty participants upon receiving their rewards.
To be honest, I think it's not stupid as you are thinking! Bounties can be effective if the developers will improve their performance when it comes of earning money from bounties. Bounties can be a good source of income and be potential in being popular. I hope it will be more secure.
I think it is not stupid but bounty earnings is very low for my forum rank. And all project lost value after ico because of this, earnings is nothing.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
I don't care about your opinion, I just want to get money from a bounty campaign, this job is very easy and doesn't require a lot of energy. Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
I think it would be better if bounty participants may be given the option to just receive either btc or eth instead of the coin they are marketing. This is for the payment of their services. This is also to prevent the massive dumping of the bounty participants upon receiving their rewards.
Bounties are not stupid. Nowadays, people expect too much things. Be patient, old days bounties were very profitable but not now.
if I think the campaign bounty is not stupid. because with the bounty we can all get a sizable income side, so who said bounty is stupid the person also added stupid
see you, you are even participating in a bounty and you are here trolling bounty hunters. you are just one of them, is this your post useful for that project you are participating? obviously you are telling them its a waste of money paying you and you are also acting it out. 
It's because it serves as advertisement for the project or ICO's if it's not working and not getting out of it they can easily cut off bounty campaign's and move to direct advertising or affiliate advertising. But bitcoin enthusiast and investors get news and update about crypto currency here in this site and even invest in this so called projects so i can say that bounties are worth it.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
if you so react to the bounty, then why do you have the signature of some kind of bounty project?
p.s. yes, there is no money in the bounty!
I don`t consider Bounty a stupid idea.
This is a good way for developers to advertise their project, while for participants this is an opportunity to earn some money!
In general, I like to participate in signatures.
This is a good way for developers to advertise their project, while for participants this is an opportunity to earn some money!
In general, I like to participate in signatures.
Bounties are not stupid. Nowadays, people expect too much things. Be patient, old days bounties were very profitable but not now.
I do not agree very much with this situation. In recent times the bounty qualities have fallen too but they have successful bounty on the row. If you do some research, you might find it.
He says bounty are stupid, not non-profitable. And he's right as I see
Yes, some of bounties are given away less percent of their tokens to the participants of bounties. Just like my tokens left in my wallet , I do have a lot type of tokens that still I can't sell because of the cheap market price and also their are few tokens. Still, some are increasing but most are stay in their line.
Jump to: