You can find all Staking Pools and Masernode Pools here and find the Pools with the best service and lowest fees!
Start Staking now with <2% Staking Pool fees
Topic: Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards (Read 1698 times)
Do you want to find the best Staking Pools and Masternode Pools for your favourite coin?
You can find all Staking Pools and Masernode Pools here and find the Pools with the best service and lowest fees!
Start Staking now with <2% Staking Pool fees
You can find all Staking Pools and Masernode Pools here and find the Pools with the best service and lowest fees!
Start Staking now with <2% Staking Pool fees
If the number of participants has been set the maximum limit will certainly have a higher impact. Because only with the number of participants, certainly the allocation distributed will be high. Not to mention if there are participants who don't get stakes every week, they will get more.
This is of course very good, but the best option is fixed payments that do not depend on the number of stacks. 
It's not, it doesn't matter how much the participants are if:
They put those limit rules just to make sure that they will get what they want with high "quality" goods instead of just filling campaigns with bunch of newbies.
- The reserved coins for bounties are low or even not equally distributed on the entire campaigns.
- The token's price is shit
They put those limit rules just to make sure that they will get what they want with high "quality" goods instead of just filling campaigns with bunch of newbies.
What a load of crap. There is no fact behind what you saying you speculating and making up things without properly checking. It depends on the total stake / the number of people. they sometimes have to readjust this sometimes. You are new so you can be forgiven.
If the number of participants has been set the maximum limit will certainly have a higher impact. Because only with the number of participants, certainly the allocation distributed will be high. Not to mention if there are participants who don't get stakes every week, they will get more.
Yes! I agree with you! A good bounty without limitations will give you a penny as rewards! Look at the recent 000btc and CyberMiles bounty campaign! They had no limitations, so within a week, more than 9K people joined in CyberMiles bounty and in 000Btc more than 10 thousand replies has made already! So, after ending the bounty, hunters will get a little reward! But if they come with limitations then we might see a good reward for the bounty hunters! This is the difference!
Indeed, there are many bounties with very many participants,perhaps many hunters think the project is good and potential. And I think with participant restrictions, the rewards obtained by bounty hunters must be greater and many bounty managers use this method to reward bounty hunters.
I had participated in those not too long ago and somewhat did observed that most of them set limitations when it comes to the number of participants. But that is not really the top factor as to why I choose the bounties that I choose. My main factor is choosing bounties is more on the leadership and the community that participates on it. You look at the participation volume, how many are joining on their telegram group, social media, trends and others.
Yes! I agree with you! A good bounty without limitations will give you a penny as rewards! Look at the recent 000btc and CyberMiles bounty campaign! They had no limitations, so within a week, more than 9K people joined in CyberMiles bounty and in 000Btc more than 10 thousand replies has made already! So, after ending the bounty, hunters will get a little reward! But if they come with limitations then we might see a good reward for the bounty hunters! This is the difference!
Other example is the stake campaign that pays on btc . the campaign is not strict and it says no limit but the pay is also to little even at higher rank accounts .
this kind of campaign does not do any good in the forum because they are only going to attract spammers that will pollute the forum with their nonsensical post burst just to claim the small reward .
good thing that stake campaign have been shut down . i hope that other will end the same so that the forum will look clean again .
usually so, good projects usually limit participants. I often see it in the bounty signatures that limit the maximum participants to 100 or more. but usually not more than 300. that's fair because it means that from the start the team has set a definite target and doesn't change so the project will run smoothly according to the whitepapper and road map.
Yes! I agree with you! A good bounty without limitations will give you a penny as rewards! Look at the recent 000btc and CyberMiles bounty campaign! They had no limitations, so within a week, more than 9K people joined in CyberMiles bounty and in 000Btc more than 10 thousand replies has made already! So, after ending the bounty, hunters will get a little reward! But if they come with limitations then we might see a good reward for the bounty hunters! This is the difference!
today, almost all bounty companies cause a lot of mistrust. All participants of the Bounty company are faced with either non-payment of earned rewards, as well as a complete lack of information not only about their remuneration, but also about the prospects of the project in which they participated. Most likely such projects can be called fraud. But there are projects that seem promising, but in fact the team is trying in every way to deceive people and not give the reward that was announced at the very beginning. As an example, the bounty of the company MenaPay, when instead of real remuneration paid a penny.
I know what you're talking about, because I have already met information about this company on the bitcointalk.org forum. Menapay received a very large negative rating from the forum participants, because it deceived those who worked for the good of the project.
today, almost all bounty companies cause a lot of mistrust. All participants of the Bounty company are faced with either non-payment of earned rewards, as well as a complete lack of information not only about their remuneration, but also about the prospects of the project in which they participated. Most likely such projects can be called fraud. But there are projects that seem promising, but in fact the team is trying in every way to deceive people and not give the reward that was announced at the very beginning. As an example, the bounty of the company MenaPay, when instead of real remuneration paid a penny.
It is logical that the restrictions or limitations in bounties lead to higher rewards and this is because when there is restrictions not everybody will be able to participate in that bounty which will lead to low total stakes and higher rewards or tokens per stakes.
In companies with a limited number of participants, payments may be higher. Performing such an award is an opportunity to calculate your award, since the total number of tokens allocated by the project is divided into a limited number of participants.
We all know about this problem. But that is problem for bounty hunters, not for managers and ICO teams.
They need as many participants as possible. More participants = bigger influence on social media sites.
you're right. The team spent some money and of course wanted their project to spread as much as possible, which was beneficial for their project but it was a nightmare for bounty hunters. I support limiting the number of people participating in campaigns, getting tired of only getting a few dollars after a few months. They need as many participants as possible. More participants = bigger influence on social media sites.
We all know about this problem. But that is problem for bounty hunters, not for managers and ICO teams.
They need as many participants as possible. More participants = bigger influence on social media sites.
They need as many participants as possible. More participants = bigger influence on social media sites.
For sure, the more limitations, the harder it is to get through and to get your reward. Especially, when the team requires a KYC process as well, so the more you need to do, the bigger your rewards are going to be.
But as a rule, getting into such companies is also very difficult, so you need to constantly monitor the beginning of new projects on the forum.
For sure, the more limitations, the harder it is to get through and to get your reward. Especially, when the team requires a KYC process as well, so the more you need to do, the bigger your rewards are going to be.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
yes you are partially right although this does not include all bounties with limitations. But I have know quite some bounties which has placed limitations and the payment was quite good. The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
I know you don't mean that bounties without limitations pay less because I do a lot of bounties without limitation and some of them pay very well. What I get from this post is that, bounties with limitations have better chances of paying higher rewards. I agree though, bounties like utrum was incredible
Jump to: