Topic: Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards - page 3. (Read 1698 times)
It is okay that participation limitation will increase stake allocation and rewards. But I do wonder that if a project itself is not good or do not have practical goals, then it is worthless to acquire a large amount of tokens. I will be better off getting a small amount of worthy and good tokens. So it means we must pick a good project for bounty programme.
By doing generosity it becomes immediately clear what the company is. If the team itself conducts bounty and makes a tough selection so as not to miss scammers, this is only a positive plus.
When you might think so but the issue is the confirmation of the project and the rules in place and there is always a clause of can change the rules in no time at their own , but the reward set for every campaign is good too to know what you can be expecting at the end of the campaign.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
Maybe, but not necessarily. The most important thing is the quality of the project - if it's a bad project, it doesn't matter if they limit it to even 10 participants, you won't get much of a payout.
Second most important probably are the percentages - so the percent that it paid out as bounty, this can vary hugely, and then following on from that is the split of the percentage that is going to your chosen campaign, e.g. Facebook bount could be 25% or could be 5% of total bounty.
After this yes, I'd agree that a cap on people joining can have an effect.
I think all the bounty hunters are always looking the higher reward but there are few bounties with higher rewards but they have limitations for the participants to participate that bounty, but for me it is good for the project that have no limitation of the participants to help the project promote.
developers team or bounty manager have their own reason about limitation bounty participants.maybe less bounty hunter get reward it could keep token price stable.more people join bigger chance to token price drop.
Limitations reduced the number of the participants thereby leading to high reward for eligible ones after the end of the campaign. However, I have seen in some cases that the limitation does not have effect especially when the campaign suffers other challenges such as not making enough sales, technical problems that lead to reduction in amount allocated to bounty. This often happen and at the end of the day, hunters only earn penny. cointorox allocated more than $300k for bounty campaign, less than 400 hunters participated. When token was distributed, no hunter earn above $60 even when you participate in all their campaign.
I think limitation always brings competition and competition always brings the best in us. I makes the reward good. It also goes a long way to increase value to the coin because it will be talked about and people will get interested
I think all the bounty hunters are always looking the higher reward but there are few bounties with higher rewards but they have limitations for the participants to participate that bounty, but for me it is good for the project that have no limitation of the participants to help the project promote.
I just thought they are limitations regarding bounty participants because of the balance tend to allocate or because of the supply to be distributed to tje bbounty participants. Somehow, I agreed that the more they limit the participants, the higher the reward. But I am just thinking, the importance is the legitimacy of the project to consider and not the other way around.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Well, that is not always the case. Higher payouts may also depend on the number of campaigns the bounty hunter can participate in within that particular bounty program.The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The fact is, higher payouts does not guarantee the success of a project. This should not be the key factor to look out for before choosing which bounty to join. Hunters must always do their personal research and look out for the potentials of the project before joining.
It seems like only an observation.
Yeah, some bounties may pay with that limitations but i don't think it is a common thing.
Its really not that a common thing but I've joined some bounties with limitations in the past ,like 4 different projects Yeah, some bounties may pay with that limitations but i don't think it is a common thing.
From a marketing point of view, limiting the number of participants should be compensated by the presence of well-developed social networks and blogs, then such bounty campaign will be effective. I'm always
suspicious to flashy advertisements in the bounty campaign — pool 2 million, price of token = $ 1! As a rule, such projects often do not pay hunters, or we get the next shitkoins.
suspicious to flashy advertisements in the bounty campaign — pool 2 million, price of token = $ 1! As a rule, such projects often do not pay hunters, or we get the next shitkoins.
You don't have to wait for decades before you can sell your tokens from bounties that are already listed on exchanges but the rewards are always very low but bounties with limitations seem to be the solution for low rewards ,its indeed a brilliant idea ,it means the hunters will get a more fair rewards to share
The quality of the project matters a lot, you can be given many token with no value, you should always look after the quality of a project before you do their bounties, what is the importance of getting many tokens with no value.
Maybe some of them pay higher rewards because the price is high but not all, because some of bounties pay on tokens and tokens are not listed and even after listing not value high and sometimes limitation is not good.
I'm tired of joining bounties with tempting rewards over millions of dollars and when they finally get listed on exchanges they become literally worthless
That's right even there is a bounty that prizes 2 million dollars. This is just a softcap joke, not up to $ 2m. After entering the market, the hotbit token fell 100x fold and was worthless.
I'm tired of joining bounties with tempting rewards over millions of dollars and when they finally get listed on exchanges they become literally worthless
That's right even there is a bounty that prizes 2 million dollars. This is just a softcap joke, not up to $ 2m. After entering the market, the hotbit token fell 100x fold and was worthless.
Yes! I agree with you! A good bounty without limitations will give you a penny as rewards! Look at the recent 000btc and CyberMiles bounty campaign! They had no limitations, so within a week, more than 9K people joined in CyberMiles bounty and in 000Btc more than 10 thousand replies has made already! So, after ending the bounty, hunters will get a little reward! But if they come with limitations then we might see a good reward for the bounty hunters! This is the difference!
I'm tired of joining bounties with tempting rewards over millions of dollars and when they finally get listed on exchanges they become literally worthless
Some have claimed to participated in bounties with no limitations and have huge payout reward ,meaning they are able to sell there tokens at a worthful rewards so I guess not all bounties with no limitations pays bad rewards
Jump to: