Topic: Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards - page 4. (Read 1709 times)
I've been in these bounties with limitations but that is not always the case. I've joined signature campaigns where the members are capped and I was expecting a higher amount of tokens and higher price of the coins. But in the end, it still depended on how the team will perform in their project. I did receive a lot of tokens but it's still not profitable.
Bounty rewards for cryptocurrency projects where the number of participants are capped is always going to be higher or more reasonable than projects which are not capped, and this is just basic maths. Capped participants mean the rewards is shared fairly among the participants but open projects will have u limited number of signups and will result is smaller bounty hunters rewards.
Exactly, with restrictions on bounty participants so that prizes are also quite high besides controlling the work done will be easier. Doing a quality project will give a high value to the participants or the team. Quality projects and success so that high values will also be able to achieve.
Bounty rewards for cryptocurrency projects where the number of participants are capped is always going to be higher or more reasonable than projects which are not capped, and this is just basic maths. Capped participants mean the rewards is shared fairly among the participants but open projects will have u limited number of signups and will result is smaller bounty hunters rewards.
Obviously bounties with limitations should pay higher cause the number of participants that will share the bounty allocation will be reduced. This means more token for the eligible participants. Some bounties restrict in different ways.
This statement can be work if the project is really good and successful/booming in the market. Of course bounty hunters will get higher rewards. Its just a math, the less people, the more you get.
But the important thing is it all depend on its project.
But the important thing is it all depend on its project.
I agree with you. If the project is a good one , then the limitations can pay well. But if the allocation is worth nothing, the limitation won't work well. The reward wil het shitty
This statement can be work if the project is really good and successful/booming in the market. Of course bounty hunters will get higher rewards. Its just a math, the less people, the more you get.
But the important thing is it all depend on its project.
But the important thing is it all depend on its project.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
I agree on this one, but its very rare for some bounty projects to limit their participants from participating in the projects, because the rule, is to scatter the awareness to the community, thats why, the higher the number of participants, the better to the projects, compared to a few number of participants promoting the projects.
of course it is true that what you say is the limitation of participants in a campaign is one of the advantages for the participants, because with these restrictions the stake can be obtained so much that of course the pay will also be better than the unrestricted campaign
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
I will agree with you on that, like 3 projects that I sis bounty campaign for that has limitation has actually paid off very well for me but that does not mean that bounties without limitation doesn't pay
Yes, at the moment, more and more people refuse to participate in bounty companies and for the fact that projects do not restrict participants and the number of participants is so large that everyone gets a penny and I think that this is unfair and with that you need to do something or increase the pool for a fee or enter limits on participants.
Bounties are no longer what it used to be most projects have lost a great deal of their worth over the past year. ICOs fail to reach softcap all these has weakened bounty hunting spirit.
It is not entirely true. The bounty payment are always base on the amount of money raised. So even if many people filled the project and more money is raised, everyone can have share of the allocated amount. A bounty can have limitation yet the amount to share will be small and even if 10 people are sharing it , it won't be enough. I think all is base on percentage allocated and the amount raised.
Of course with that limitation, we can calculate how many tokens we get according to the allocations they provide with some participants participating in the project, of course that is a big opportunity for us to get a large number of tokens, thus limiting participants to a Bounty is a good quality project, but also depends on the rules of each manager who holds the project.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
You are very right and I share your sentiment. Restriction, limitations and being strict with bounty rules will allow genuine and hard-working bounty participants earn what they deserve. When bounty is overpopulated, at the end of the day, the reward might not be up to a dollar.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
Is it profitable to join any bounty in 2019, can you provide some good projects you think are worth to join, i know that all of the tokens and projects are worthless in the long run, but if there is any project that looks promising in the short run i would like to hear from people who have invested their time in bounties. The main reason for these bounties and promotions to have maximum exposure for their project and i do not think they will limit the amount of participants because you could earn a bigger share 
. 
Yes, at the moment, more and more people refuse to participate in bounty companies and for the fact that projects do not restrict participants and the number of participants is so large that everyone gets a penny and I think that this is unfair and with that you need to do something or increase the pool for a fee or enter limits on participants.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
That's right a Capped bounty participants ensures those selected earns big from it. An open bounty leads to less earnings. The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Restricting participants who join is indeed very good because each participant will get a lot of payments but now seldom do projects because their think more and more are joining, greater the chance to spread project news
Ive experienced different type of bounty campaign and different Bounty Managet handling. I can say that the best campaign always with the quality one. Also, experiencr no limit participants and the reward is so small. Dont even enough for fees to send it to an exchange. Campaigns should have moderate participants so it can widely spread its worth but too many also not good. Its alright to have few as long the content of sharing has quality.
I think that the quantitative or qualitative constraints in the bounty campaign do not provide guarantees for a project that pays high. The success of a coin cannot be determined only from the limits of a bounty campaign. Bounty campaigns are only a small part of contributing to the success of a project. Many factors contributed to the success of a bounty campaign project. No one can guarantee how much income we get when we take part in a bounty campaign. A project that has not yet achieved a soft cap is certainly still being considered. Bounty campaigns that require restrictions are not necessarily good bounty campaigns.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Definitely, bounty with cap usually pays more compare to those without any cap, i think it's logical that few number of participants will result to higher reward. The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Jump to: