Topic: Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards - page 6. (Read 1698 times)
In my opinion, if a project bounties limits participants, it is most likely that the project pays a higher prize. other than that the price of the token is also worth quite high.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
I'll pick the first one it guarantees that all participants will get high rewards to compare to number two because so many bounty hunters had a lot of followers and connections in their social media account, I experienced participating in a campaign with a limited number of participants and it's really profitable for bounty hunters.
Maybe it depens on what bounties is running. I think social media campaign doesnot need limitation because bigger participants means bigger attraction. Higher reward achieve from less participants like signature, content creator, etc.
There are many such companies with limits, but they put too big limits. if they put a limit of 200 participants on facebook or twitter, it would be much more interesting than the companies that exist now. I have not seen a single company in which the established limit of participants was reached
They dont limit because they do need maximum exposure of their project thats why most of them doesnt really implement such rule.This is why its being flooded by lots of members on each bounty program and make the rewards even more lesser as the member counts
rises up so its not a surprising thing.
There are many such companies with limits, but they put too big limits. if they put a limit of 200 participants on facebook or twitter, it would be much more interesting than the companies that exist now. I have not seen a single company in which the established limit of participants was reached
Some projects want large number of participants in order to create more audience and attract potential investors towards their project, which is why they do not get bothered even if they have hundreds of thousands of participants.
Well, there are quite good number of such bounty that succeeded, but also know that some of them did not succeed. So it is a game of chance.
Well, there are quite good number of such bounty that succeeded, but also know that some of them did not succeed. So it is a game of chance.
I agree with you on the first part (Quantative ), but not on the second (Qualitative ). But even if they limit the number of participants, there is no guarantee that they will get high quality participants. There are a number of scammers here, who will enroll in to the social media bounty using their dozens of FB and Twitter accounts. And now coming to the second part, if they set a threshold, there is no guarantee that those accounts which are able to satisfy those requirement will be having high quality. What if the bounty hunter had just purchased those accounts, from someone else.
But I agree that it will be good for the bounty hunters. The payouts per participants will rise, although still there is no surety that one user will register with only one account.
But I agree that it will be good for the bounty hunters. The payouts per participants will rise, although still there is no surety that one user will register with only one account.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Often times, bounties with limitation do bring higher reward and at the same time, there has been some bounties with limitation that doesn't bring higher reward because of infinitesimal bounty pool. Higher reward in bounty depends largely on the bounty pool of a particular project and the quality of the project itself.
What benefits will the project have if the bounty manager limits the number of participants in the bounty campaign? None benefits. They pursue only one goal - more advertising for the same money.
you are wrong, when the manager limits the number of participants then it will make each participant's reward big. and the benefits for the manager can support the big names of the managers, the better. it becomes important for managers to still get the trust of the community that has been built. 
I think there are not enough bounties that pay big rewards so there is also a risky opportunity in the bounty bounty because many bounty scams are showing up and the low price of bitcoin or higher is high other new projects will be affected by the price to tell if the market collapsed and the holders and investors are losing money so others are so lazy to join the bounty because the rewards are small with the encounters just like it's been too late bounty and ultimately scam the bounty or so their project is not successful and other reasons do not reach hardcap so risky bounty is great.
you can see in a good bounty they will certainly give a limit, and also for a bounty signature. if you see the bounty in bountyhive.io, there are usually often limited bounties and the quota of participants is always very quickly fulfilled because the project is really good.
What benefits will the project have if the bounty manager limits the number of participants in the bounty campaign? None benefits. They pursue only one goal - more advertising for the same money.
It is true, because the big projects know exactly what they want from participants and are doing harder limitations to protect the whole bounty from fraud participants. I also mentioned that really big projects do not have huge bounty funds, but they always pay and you can trade those coins.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
We really should have limitations on the participants, I've participated in a bounty campaign where there are no restrictions people are joining and admin keeps them as long as they can report, I end up getting $8 worth of the stakes because of the so many participants and that's over two months of campaign, can you imagine that.
I think this is also true for KYC bounties, as it's a form of limitation in itself. I've noticed enough KYC bounties that are more rewarding, no doubt due to it's restrictions.
I'm not saying this is a good thing, in fact I disagree with KYC for bounties, but the average KYC bounty value is notably higher than the average bounty value.
I'm not saying this is a good thing, in fact I disagree with KYC for bounties, but the average KYC bounty value is notably higher than the average bounty value.
I think most bounties don't do it this way because more participants means more exposure of the project. Your suggestions are good but i think if a certain bounty doesn't limit the participants to increase each and everyone's rewards then at least increase the bounty allocation to make it fair.
I have actually participated in some bounties that operated that way, just the way most bounty campaigns limit thenumber of signature campaign participants is the same way they limit the number of bounty hunters, but I think most companies that does that are projects that already has funds to run their company.They just need little more to make it a success, so they don’t really need too much campaign, these projects usually ends in like 2 to 4 weeks, unlike those other ones that are raising funds from zero and extends the time of campaign o almost 9 months before they finish their ICO.
absolutelly right, few participant mean more rewards will we get, because divide by few people, not divide over 1k people.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
The limitations and restrictions can make the rewards higher indeed, but it can reduce the number of hunters too.
I think the most campaign filled by hunters is the content creation campaign.
Maybe limitations will be required in content creation campaign, so the hunters won't make copy paste articles.
You misunderstand the essence of the bounty program. It is voluntary and optional. Therefore, the organizers are entitled to decide how many participants should be at their bounty. Bounty program is created to popularize the project. Therefore, the more participants the higher the probability of financial success of the project. And it also lower the probability that you will be deceived.
Recently there have been very few bounty hunters, so there were no limitions, but we all see that the market is alive, the forum and telegram are more active, so I think we should start to see new bounty. Even the old scams started to come alive - it's a miracle.
the number of bounty hunters now very much.and if bounty manager didn't limiting participant in their campaign they could be super busy to check all of their work.and it's very rare to find manager that limiting participants, except on campaign that paid using btc. Jump to: