I do not think none of the clients will accepts the limitation on bounty campaigns, there are signature campaigns with the limitations, I hope that is enough for the bitcointalk users. If you want to participate in bounties.
Please look at the campaign manager and confirm the project is really heavy to participate. Check the project owners updates also to confirm their potential.
Topic: Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards - page 11. (Read 1698 times)
In this case, I agree that the limits and limitations for participating in a prize campaign are efforts to achieve the goals that everyone wants, namely higher payments. On the other hand, methods like this are very suitable for maintaining commitment to the success of the project and making participants feel their own satisfaction.
Judging by the many interests of the community, they began to follow the bounty in order to get the gifts from the projects that were followed, so that all those who governed the stay of the project leader and how many tokens will be distributed especially in the social media budget, if I see all the projects getting more gifts, only those who follow the bounty signature..
Of course limitation means more stricter rules. If rules are very strict, then normal users will feel reluctant to join them. So this increased reward gives them a reason to join those higher paying campaign. Again, since they have more rules, this means they will have better (not a shit quality poster) users, which means better quality of advertisement by the users. They sure can add a few extra reward for this 
.
. RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
in as much as I think you are correct in a way though but that's not really true. Because most of the bounties with same quality still don't have good payout or they don't pay either just like some bounties The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
I understand why you want limited participants for every bounty campaign because it will increase people rewards but more participants then more chance to the devs makes their projects popular and if those projects popular then to get more investors is not hard and i think that's why bounty have no limitations of participants because the devs want their projects reach their target sell
Though I agree with you that limitation is good for higher payment, yes it's good but most times most bounty managers use that opportunity to pay bounty hunters less, and they will keep most of the rewards for themselves. I've seen that kind of thing twice. Either there will be limitations or not, everything is still based on how trustworthy the bounty manager is.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Its just normal to think that the fewer the participant the higher the reward would possibly be able to gain but talking about profitability wont still be sure.Why?The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Even how big your reward is if those tokens are shit then you would still end up nothing.So theres no point if you do able to join that project in the first place.
Also that theres only a few bounty that do limits its participants because most project do always have that concern on having maximum exposure which in result
to unlimited members needed.
The bounty wouldn't really limit the number that could participate in their campaign ,
Because they need more people for publicity and to promote their campaign to attract investors.
But the limitations would really affect the bounty rewards but that doesn't mean that you could earn more from their campaign,
Remember that not all of the campaign would pay and not all of them would have a value in the market so even with the limitations for participants wouldn't guarantee a thing.
Because they need more people for publicity and to promote their campaign to attract investors.
But the limitations would really affect the bounty rewards but that doesn't mean that you could earn more from their campaign,
Remember that not all of the campaign would pay and not all of them would have a value in the market so even with the limitations for participants wouldn't guarantee a thing.
RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS
The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Restrictions are also KYC mandatory, which was announced at the beginning of the bounty of the company. Further restrictions may be indicated by complex requirements for execution. In general, payments in these companies are much higher and differ from those with low requirements. The limitations can be done in two ways:
1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.
Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign
2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.
Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.
Not in all cases, some bounties with limitations Attimes turns shit too... Attimes the bm cheat with limitations to hold tokens back. This days, bounties is a game of luck... Bms use hunters now to get token from dev. Limitations or not. Some bounties still pay well without limit.
Yes it does matter but in some bounties even without ant rsstrictiona and limitations hunters do get decent reward its about how much team has allocated for the bounty campaigns, secondly you forgot to mention KYC, not all bounty hunters want to share their personal details online so such campaigns usually also get less number of participants as compared to the other campaigns that do not require kyc.
Most BMs do not take that into consideration. Those who pay with BTC goes like this, but most of the altcoin payers do not consider it. Yes, this means a better bitcointalk in all respects.
I sometimes feel frustrated with some of the current bounties, some that have many participants reduce allocations sometimes those who have fewer participants also reduce allocations because of some things that don't make sense. so for now there will not be much allocation for bounty participants
This is very true because bounties have specific amount of money which is shared among participants regardless of their number. So whenever there are rules and the numbers decrease, the few participants will get more money as compared to one with more participants.
That's right, and I agree if there is a bounty or project that limits the participants for a better result, and usually it is a good bounty because the team and manager are very concerned about the projects they handle. 
This is very true because bounties have specific amount of money which is shared among participants regardless of their number. So whenever there are rules and the numbers decrease, the few participants will get more money as compared to one with more participants.
for bounty participants payment methods are indeed very diverse. we can see that there are indeed from the beginning making regulations with a limited number of participants, some of which are indeed from the beginning never limiting participants but with a fixed allocation. and if the fewer people who join will make the more participants can get as you say.
Of course limited will guarantee higher reward for accepted participants. Cause the bounty allocation will be shared for few people compared to the crowd that would have drastically reduce the bounty allocation.
This is very true because bounties have specific amount of money which is shared among participants regardless of their number. So whenever there are rules and the numbers decrease, the few participants will get more money as compared to one with more participants.
they need to limit on social media campaign only. the others still on high payment / reward. social media campaign so far have the highest user that join there, many new bounty no need qualify to join on social media bounty
It all depends, some project can be strict and still not lead to high reward, I support a fair share deal for bounty hunters, I love placing some strict rules to avoid and checkmate bounty abusers which is not healthy for a project. Sometimes when participants are limited in a bounty campaign, some participants do leave the campaign for a better offer and this sometimes will leave the BM with some fall short of exceptions.
Jump to: