Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 113. (Read 10495 times)

We all value our time and effort differently.

For me, the recent influx of participants in social media campaigns has made me reconsider the efforts I was putting in.  The social campaigns seem to be getting a lot of people coming onboard from developing countries.  I think this is great for them, but it does affect my participation choices. Most people in poor countries NEED the tokens to immediately sell and live on, others are doing it as a hobby, while some (like me) are doing it to diversify their portfolio.

While pretty much anybody can retweet, not just anybody can write quality articles, so I’m now changing focus.

There’s normally a much bigger pool allocated to articles and fewer participants. The same goes for signatures.

There will still be social bounty opportunities where BMs limit participant numbers.

I also met the limits of the number of participants in the campaign bounty. I think this is the right method. Also I saw that some projects use very complex registration systems, which can also scare off a part of potential participants.

Last time so many info on youtube about bounty . So many people look for free money, that is why so many participants join generosity.
and the campaign of bounties is popular because even we will wait several months, we will receive an award.
I see that good managers gives participant limit for camp and its nice

We cannot deny the fact that bounty camapign are already been using from the other countries many people are actually involves which has dofferent cultures as follows. So, we just need to expect as long as the bounty is still in many would be willing yo be part of this organization as well.

I'm fully agree and one of the main requirement for me is the amount of participants. People are lazy so you have to choose pretty difficult projects. For example take a look at effect.ai bounty spreadsheet. There are so many zeroes at the signature campaign only because a special way of 2-week reports, I guess so. Plus they have some special requirements to posts. So I think it will bring good reward

Well, the ICO project is more profitable to have a lot of participants with a small number of subscribers..They pay less, but a lot of them! Although I think that large ICO, with good potential, should promote their project by large participants. Thereby showing that they have a very good idea and product!

I do not think that it is necessary to introduce any additional rules that would limit the participation of individuals in the campaigns of generosity. At this forum, such a question has already been resolved by the introduction of such a notion as merit. Without them it is impossible to advance in ranks, and hence it is impossible to get a big payment in signature campaigns. The junior member can be reached without merit, and to become a member, you need ten merits already. Of course, you can try to write very high-quality posts, if, of course, someone will notice it. However, if we admit, for a year ten merits can still be tried to collect, then another ninety to a full member already seems an unrealizable dream. I can not even say about how many years of hard work it will take. So at this forum the issue with the appearance of new members is practically solved. And the ICO campaigns themselves do not care about this problem. The more people will participate, the better will be the advertising about them. Vseravno for payment, they allocate a certain number of their new tokens. Therefore, it is not even profitable for them to interfere in this matter. As for the participants in the campaigns on social networks, there really is such a problem, the participants there are much more than in the signature campaigns and therefore the earnings there are much less. However, to participate in them or not, this is a voluntary matter.

Well, it poses a threat to bounty hunters financial rewards, and that's where it ends. The more the participants, more people to share the rewards with.
But, it's important to note that the coys would appreciate more participants. That means more publicity for them. Imagine 4k people partaking in a Facebook and Twitter bounty campaign as against 300 someone suggested. Your guess is as good as mine.

More stringent rule or not, there are bounties that reward handsomely even with more participants, we should be on the look out for these.

We only talk when the rewards for bounty participants aren't really worth it. Besides, Signature, blog, and translation pay more as against Facebook and Twitter Campaigns. I'll advise we go for the former.

personally I do not think this is a problem, companies-investors also become more, not only bounty participants, so I want to believe that everyone will still have the opportunity to earn. although, perhaps, I too optimistic...

Yes, it was tough one for us bounty hunters. Maybe they would gave at least cut off counts for every bounty like 300 participants for facebook same with twitter. Also I think they must strict before accepting if the facebook is genuine. Some of the participants, if you look on their facebook account, you will see that some are using other picture to have more friends. At least have a rule for video chat for at least 5 seconds, for facebook verification. It was a great help to lessen them by that.

Yes, more and more peple getting known about bounty. I see in Twitter there are about 4-5 thousands people. Its crazy. But if you join, everybody can do the same. Seems like in half a year we gonna have maximum 20$ payment haha. But for sure its not funny

Well that is normal that almost all bounty campaign has so many partcipants because right now there are now a lot of people is trusting and joining bounty campaign, and if we want to earn more rewards even there are so many participants we should join the bounty campaign that has a great chance to raised a lot of money.

Working for bounty is nice but risky cause lots of scammy ICO projects running. You will get shitty tokens and coins for your work.
Also there are too many participants so this means less shitty tokens.

It seems to be more correct that when the profit decreases and no.of participants increases ,people will move on for new resources as in any other business.
Therefore it becomes compulsory to make the rules and regulations more stringent to participate in Bounty.

I think there are already strict rules and regulations to participating in bounties. But since member of this community is increasing, you can't avoid that some bounties would be flocked especially the popular ones. And about the social campaigns, I think the developers would want to get as much as they can get because advertising in social medias is also a great way to introduce their ICO to the community.

Indeed. Many people just signup and do nothing for the bounty. Just wasting everyone's time.

I think it's reasonable that the popular bounty turns out that many participants are following. But the consequence we have to accept is that we only get lower rewards. Therefore many follow many different types of bounty campaign so we can get more prizes. Especially Signature campaign is bounty with the largest allocation. So if the project is a success, surely we will be able to many reward.

I think this bounty campaign already have rules and they only allowed a participant who can comply and qualified to their campaign, it's just too many participants that are joining bounty campaign that is well qualified to be part of the campaign, so there is no need a regulation from moderators of this forum.

I believe the bounty managers can set other stiff measures to measure rewards for bounty thereby leaving those going into it for cheap money no other option but to opt out

Well, the choice we have is not big. Or smash an account on the forum. Or write articles and shoot videos. Choose campaigns from unknown managers, campaign managers!