Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 116. (Read 10495 times)
Now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit, will be must hard working for this.
I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns. 
I am thinking that those campaigns that have huge numbers of participants are manage by popular manager in this forum. Basically people put their trust to the person that they know not scammer. We choose the person that we know real and not liar.
Really participants in fb and tw became too much that attracts decrease in earnings, but as far as it is favorable to bounty companies to limit number of participants, more people - more advertizing, unless isn't present?
I agree it's problem for old hunter with all this shit posters. But I think this will soon change, more and more ICO use platform for bounty instead of forum
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Because of too much participants of a bounty program its divided by the different ICO project. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I agree, we need to have something new to give bounty hunters equal, if we can't just rank these high ranking personal data will enjoy the bounty movement, like all the lower levels like we do not have such a high gamble? This is unfair, because we publish the same number of posts per week.
Well crypto become popular the users will increase and more users will join in bounty campaign. It would help to grow the economy but in the other hand for bounty hunters this not good. To maintain the high reward so wr have no choice to up our ranks, increase our followers, improve our skills.
here a lot of people who need money, all vying to get more. it all happened today, the bounty almost full, but this time with the system merit everyone difficulty to improve the rank her, and it is quite limited to a campaign asked rank higher.
In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.Bounty campaigns is very much known nowadays which results to have many participants.Have a nice day
Share each other on the gift of why not, I prefer to share with each other on the bounty, because to pass sigcam not all can follow it, giving bonus sharing alternative also for others.
Bounty campaigns are not easy to do. So for participants to earn stakes, they actually have to work for it. Even if there are many people, not everybody will get full stakes. Some people just apply and forget about it.
A lot of people are realizing the potential of making good tokens by helping ICOs promote their projects and normally that is a good thing, the problem nevertheless is that some projects bounties are not capped and such projects may get more popularity than they actually need and the bounty hunters in return are paid pennies for the work done.
But anyway most tasks are easy enough to accomplish
But anyway most tasks are easy enough to accomplish
Accept that truth because the number of people wants to earn money with crypto increases day by day. Therefore, you have to understand the risk of dropping your real life job to make money with crypto
What about LuckyToken? There are not many participants here and rules are easy.
i do not think that the rising of participants will reduce the number of investors. if the project is really good, the people can do both bounty and invest in tokens. No problems!
well i have read this question or suggestion you may say many times in the past and no absolute answer comes to mind but, every new free lance work initially (in this case bounty hunting) has a heavy payoff which will reduce with growing time and it will saturate so people expecting previous payoffs should revise their expectation because too many people have realized the potential gain from bounty campaigns. Going with KYC might help but that raises doubts about privacy so there it goes. Everyone wants piece of that pie as they say.
I think the best option would be to set limits on the number of participants. Then the bounty would bring a good profit.
When there are more than 1000 people participating in one bounty campaign, then the profit will be small.
When there are more than 1000 people participating in one bounty campaign, then the profit will be small.
I also noticed that there are lots of high ranking users joining the signature campaigns in the last week or 2 of a bounty and in some cases dig switching between the bounty managers checking to try and get 2 bounty payments!
More people - less profit in one hand and more different Bounties in another. It's better to take part in those which are more limited campaigns. Here is a kind of regulation, not so many participants in translation and moderation, media.
Jump to: