Author

Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 115. (Read 10495 times)

newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
April 02, 2018, 05:07:49 PM
some ICO and bounty campaign limit they user to join. so maybe the reward can split fairly. and many manager now see the profile of user in bitcointalk, to know they can join the bounty or not.
jr. member
Activity: 200
Merit: 1
April 02, 2018, 05:04:16 PM
Bounty and too many participants! That is one of the major challenges of bounty campaign now. However, many of these participants are nor serious and dedicated to the campaign thereby making the spreadsheet unnecessarily filled up. The moment some people notice large number on the spreadsheet, the are discouraged in participating in such campaign because they believe that the tokens will be shares among multitude rather than little people.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
April 02, 2018, 05:01:41 PM
Bounty is very popular. Most people are in bounty though its quite tough.
The law of supply and demand should apply to this. Because, the more the member or applicants there is, the more the bounty profit lessen or decrease. It is also one way for people to earn crypto for free.

It must be limited by the administrators.
newbie
Activity: 100
Merit: 0
April 02, 2018, 04:54:08 PM
more people learn about cryptoworld, and opportunities to earn money. It is normal process that number of participants in bounty campaigns grows.
full member
Activity: 672
Merit: 100
April 02, 2018, 04:37:46 PM
Well, I could remember when I started last year the spreadsheet isn't that crowded but a lot of people are into bounty campaign now. What I feel is bounty still pays of you are strategic with the way you choose the campaigns you intend participating.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
April 02, 2018, 04:22:13 PM
Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?


It depends on the model used. If there are stakes, than the  more participants, the less is your profit. But they may also assign a predefined number of tokens.

Too many bounty hunters, you're right.  If by choosing the best participants  you mean filtering out those with Twitter and FB accounts dedicated to bounties only, than almost no one will be eligible for stakes. Good for increasing your profits, but bad for the community opinion 
newbie
Activity: 186
Merit: 0
April 02, 2018, 10:47:20 AM
The issue of many participants joining bounties nowadays is getting too much, the rewards for each participant is getting slim and slim, the only solution I can suggest is that the bounty manager should introduce a strict bounty that would limit the amount of participants just like bountyhive... That can limit the slim fit of bounty rewards.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 109
April 02, 2018, 10:46:00 AM
Yes, I've already seen that some bounty campaign administrators apply restrictions on rank, I think the quality of campaigns from this only improves!
copper member
Activity: 490
Merit: 2
April 02, 2018, 10:29:18 AM
I like the way Bountyhive manages the participants. Their way makes it more transparent whih part of the bounty is shared for each tier.

I agree.I am also favoring BOUNTYHIVE much and the reasons for this are:~
Firstly, it explains each and every detail about the project .The beginning and ending dates ,the way the work is to be done ,etc.
Secondly,the projects are managed and portrayed in a very convenient way.
Thirdly, the way the stakes are to be distributed is already given along with the project and it is not equal for everyone rather it depends on the work one chooses to do.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
April 02, 2018, 10:26:52 AM
Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?


I think that it is worth limiting some companies to the rank and a merit, but not all the rest will be unfair to younger members, I am sure that we need a certain algorithm that to organize everything. I saw that some managers limit propaganda on a rank, and all want to participate in these campaigns.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
April 02, 2018, 10:16:14 AM
Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.
I think 10 accs it's not so bad - I've heard recently one bounty campaign kicked-away about 1000 multiple / bot accs  Shocked

Yeah man, this can be possible. This week I've found a list of telegram with atlease 50 accounts from 1 person but I think noone will ban them, you know they are +1 on telegram.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 11
Betrium 🎾 Worldwide Betting Exchange
April 01, 2018, 03:01:22 PM
Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.
I think 10 accs it's not so bad - I've heard recently one bounty campaign kicked-away about 1000 multiple / bot accs  Shocked
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 02:58:09 PM
I like the way your thoughts go. But who will vibe these members for the bounty? What to do if you are not there?
In fact, I saw a few bounty managers who tried to choose the best in their opinion, and what do you think they got? of the 500-odd accounts for Twitter have chosen 2. Do you know who these two lucky ones are?) These guys are Newbie who have not made a single retweet about ICO on their Twitter account. I do not think that the manager's choice was the right one. Among those whose accounts have not been accepted, there were really good twitter accounts that could lead the money to his project.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 106
April 01, 2018, 02:51:06 PM
It is quite obvious that FB and TWTR bounty campaigns become overpopulated. My current response is to more actively participate in signature and content creation ones. Agree that we can see the adoption of more stringent rules for bounty participants in the near future.    
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
April 01, 2018, 02:48:21 PM
I believe that generosity is based on rates, more participants mean more bets, and own bets versus general bets will decrease when getting smaller tokens.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
April 01, 2018, 02:35:29 PM
Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 11
Betrium 🎾 Worldwide Betting Exchange
April 01, 2018, 02:33:16 PM
It depends on campaign. I know campaign with 150 participants for month... and I know that bountyhive collect 5000 participants for just 1 night. Smiley
full member
Activity: 541
Merit: 101
April 01, 2018, 02:24:52 PM
Bounty is popular because it brings profit without investment. To whom it is interesting, pay attention to the TokenGo campaign https://tokengoplatform.com. For the performance of assignments, a fair payment is accrued and everything is visible and convenient in the private office. TokenGo is the platform for the tokenization of business.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 10
April 01, 2018, 07:56:33 AM
Yep that's right, there are too many participants in social media campaign and reward less than before. but it's does not matter for me  if we are fair and not cheating. and for investor i think bounty hunter will become investor if they are interested with some project.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 503
April 01, 2018, 03:24:48 AM
In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.Bounty campaigns is very much known nowadays which results to have many participants.Have a nice day

Well actually some bounty campaigns are happy if their bounty is flood by participants and that means it gather a lot of attention from the community and have a good bounty allocation . However, the participants are the one who loss the chance of getting high stakes that's why it's better to put limit in every campaign so all have the chance to get more.
Jump to: