Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 119. (Read 10495 times)
Because it is an easy way to earn profits . There are some bounties that have a limitations 1000 places .
I think that ICO projects will not limit the number of participants. Why should they? The number of participants will work according to market rules. Once this task is unattractive, the amount will be reduced
Bounty and participation are not so confusion I think so.Its so easy on my way.If its bother with any project restrict with participation limit. Everything will be solved.
bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this
I think it is very difficult to overcome this, except maybe by limiting the number of participants, for example I observe there are some bounty campaign signatures limited to 100 participants, this kind of thing maybe can applied to social media bounty campaign.
Well, bounty regulation only comes into effect once ICO market gets regulated. And the regulation differs from country to country. This is quite a difficult thing.
the goal of bounty program is to promote a project in order to gain more investors so if more bounty participants will join in one project that is a good news and high posibilities success of ICO. So why you like to decrease the bounty participants? I think bounty managers set the rules and also your rewards are base in your participation, social media followers, and your rank here in bitcointalk.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes, more and more people are joining, diluting the stakes of all participants. Also, there are tons of cheaters registering several accounts and not following campaign rules but still getting the stakes. Therefore, I believe that bounty managers should use stricter rules to limit the number of participants and make life easier for themselves checking all the entries.
it's really hard to find honest ICO
not even envion, who has been collecting $ 100 million recently, not distributed the bounty.
not even envion, who has been collecting $ 100 million recently, not distributed the bounty.
This can be good! I don't see why not. Free coins
in the end of some campaigns not worthy the rewards according to work i think managers should limit participants or strict rules now some campaigns use kyc to reduce participants by removing multi accounts
The community grows and naturally the participants grow for the bounty programs. I think it's a good thing
Yes now there are too many participants in the ICO bounty, and it is became harder to earn money. All bounty need to start making KYC, because those multiaccaunts are really bad.
Sign up to more than 1 to increase what you recieve, only good way around it 
You are right, I also see in spreedseth in a matter of days can be full,This is the result of many of its members registering Even my knowledge many who take advantage of this condition by making more than one bitcoin account
Don't worry, we are still in the early days. Even though it seems like we have gone mainstream, we are still in the very early stages of cryptocurrencies, ICOs and thereby bounty programs.
I don't see how investors will be discouraged, because they can join the bounty programs too and at the same time invest.
It's a lot of bounties because many people are looking for gifts but many investors are inclined to invest in bounty, because there are bounty campaigns that limit bounty participants the best thing to do is to choose a good gift manager with good ICO, better use your time to find the gift manager good and ICO development rather than incorporating all the gifts I don't see how investors will be discouraged, because they can join the bounty programs too and at the same time invest.
Bounty programs will naturally come to an equilibrium with the number of participants and the rewards available. At some point, people will decide its not worth the effort to earn $0.20 of tokens for example.
The bigger issue is the dumping of bounty rewards immediately after it gets unlocked. So I am very aware of the amount of bounty rewards up for grabs as it determines the dump when it gets on the exchanges. Looking only to get involved in bounty programs which offers less than 1% of its total tokens.
The bigger issue is the dumping of bounty rewards immediately after it gets unlocked. So I am very aware of the amount of bounty rewards up for grabs as it determines the dump when it gets on the exchanges. Looking only to get involved in bounty programs which offers less than 1% of its total tokens.
I can only speak for myself but I think the more people participating in the campaign the better.
Remember, a Bounty campaign is a marketing tool for the ICO promoter. The more people that support it the better.
I think the emphasis should be on quality rather than having a max amount.
The higher quality the more likely to attract high quality investors which will ultimately lead to success of the project and increasing the value of your investment.
I think there should be an effort to increase the quality of those who participate but that would be up to the project sponsor and is not my role as a participant
Remember, a Bounty campaign is a marketing tool for the ICO promoter. The more people that support it the better.
I think the emphasis should be on quality rather than having a max amount.
The higher quality the more likely to attract high quality investors which will ultimately lead to success of the project and increasing the value of your investment.
I think there should be an effort to increase the quality of those who participate but that would be up to the project sponsor and is not my role as a participant
bounty campaign is issued indeed to introduce a project made by the company so the more participants bounty then their goals are achieved and I think it's a good thing because the coins issued will also gain the confidence of the market and the price will also follow good, that's my opinion
At some point, investors would know if they joined bounty campaigns having potential participants to join, they probably have less rewards. Instead they invest if in case they evaluated project seems to be promising. With twitter and facebook campaigns to be very well known, what we need is to diversify. Join signature campaigns or learn how to translate some ICOs to your language.
Jump to: