i think the same. too many participants in the bounty campaigns. they should limited the participants and lower the number of posts for signatures (maybe 5 per week), but the eligible posts must be 250-300 character long.
with this changes, the spam maybe would be lower in this forum and the bounty participants also have more of them.
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 120. (Read 10495 times)
I hope that companies will carefully select the participants to recruit them less and pay them more. Because try to hire so many of them and not everybody do their work properly
As a bounty hunter myself, I also find it problematic to have too many participants ON THOSE WHO ARE DEEMED PROFITABLE endeavors. There are bounties that has few participants also. I think it is a matter of finding the right bounty.
True many people joining bounty could dilute the market what it was before. My suggestion would be to dedicate in those projects that are top notch.
The more the ICOs and crypto in general is advertised the better in my opinion. So this is a good thing.
Yes, if the ICO is good, then each participant will give a conversion from their advertising and "earn" a reward. If the project is bad, then there is no difference of many participants or little.
But there are more ICO nowadays so its okay if there are more participants, they have right to earn more from ICO. Its better because when they have money from ICO, they will invest in ICO. So this industry will be huge.
I prefer to join those bounties which have limited number of participants or which count weekly rewards not in stakes but in tokens. In this case you always can predict approximately how much you'll earn in total. The main problem is to find such bounties as they are very rare.
This is actually very good advice. Bounty campaigns which are regulated by the manager yahoo62278 are one of those. The only thing you need is monitoring due to high users activity. 
The more the ICOs and crypto in general is advertised the better in my opinion. So this is a good thing.
More participants mean less percentage of free token distribution.
"too many participants" , for social media campaigns like Twitter and Facebook yes.
For Campaigns like Sigs, and Media Creation .. not at all.
For Campaigns like Sigs, and Media Creation .. not at all.
A lot of participants are good for ICO. In this case, much more advertising for the same cost. How many participants will earn is not the most important problem for developers
I prefer to join those bounties which have limited number of participants or which count weekly rewards not in stakes but in tokens. In this case you always can predict approximately how much you'll earn in total. The main problem is to find such bounties as they are very rare.
Yes, there are a lot of participants now, because people tell their friends or relatives who also create their accounts and try to participate in it. I think that it would be very bad, because such a number of people exceeds demand.
it's bad for bounty hunters but good for ICOs because they have larger audience for the same price. may be later there will be some kind of limitation of participants.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think everyone has equal right to join any campaign. It's senseless to choose -so called- best participants, because more people means more advertisement for the companies. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
it will be very hard to control. I want to have a good rewards too..I will be very happy if there is a regulation that will give us a fair rewards. Considering that there are a lot of bounty campaign now.
My perception about this is that whoever think that there are tooo many participant on bounty should participate in those with less participants. I have noticed a trend, when it comes to bounty campaign. Social media like Twitter, Facebook and Telegram campaigns are most times flooded with participants, while campaigns like signature, blog, translation or some others usually have less participants. I usually prefer to go for signature.
It shouldn't matter if there is a lot of participants. If you don't a coin to have a lot of people participating in it then you are just selfish. 
Bounty is meanly used for promotions for an ICO’s. There are many bounties to grab, the opportunity is huge
My perception about this is that whoever think that there are tooo many participant on bounty should participate in those with less participants. I have noticed a trend, when it comes to bounty campaign. Social media like Twitter, Facebook and Telegram campaigns are most times flooded with participants, while campaigns like signature, blog, translation or some others usually have less participants. I usually prefer to go for signature.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There is limit on number of participants allowed . You just have to apply before others to get accepted and this requires you to be very active on this forum. With time, you will also find out the mangers with most new campaigns.
It's not a secret that Bounty hunting is indeed a good source of income. That is why there are a lot of participants joining everyday,and there will be more and more of us, so we need to have an upgraded level of the boutny rules, fbounty managers are aware of the problem that is why it would be better if they will limit the campaign participants so the bounty hunters will still enjoy the stakes.
Jump to: