Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 121. (Read 10495 times)
Yes, there are a lot of participants now, because people tell their friends or relatives who also create their accounts and try to participate in it. I think that it would be very bad, because such a number of people exceeds demand.
The project team should have a regulations on their bounties like maximum participation, the quality of profiles they are using. This will do good for both parties. When a bounty allows as many as participants, people do not feel any demand on it.
Too much participants for bounty campaign is an advantage for the project itself because the more people who would make ads the huge the exposure of the project will get as well and that would truly attract many investors from all the corner of the world, but it is not so good for the bounty hunters like me because it will affect the amount of the stake we get.
Well in bounty campaigns the main reason for starting bounty campaigns is to attract more people towards the campaign so that they can work for the company. I don't think its bad to be in a huge number for bounty campaigns. Even if the management makes strict standards for bounty campaigns then the campaign organisers may loose the good talents.
Hello community!
What do you think about the popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and fewer rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again fewer rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns are more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It's true everything you say. The more bounty campaign participants the less the results we get. But we also have to remember, if each person has their own rights and all the provision is already there who set. So we should all be more grateful for what we have now. All of them both want to find additional income, so we better compete in a healthy manner. The more ICO projects are growing, so they all have the same opportunities. What do you think about the popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and fewer rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again fewer rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns are more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
The current bonus projects are many people involved; I think due to the incidents in the investment, so many people turn to the plan to hunt for bonuses to get profits instead of investing and waiting for prices to rise. High. Maybe in the future, the bonus projects will create the number of participants to limit the plans. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Currently the most hunted by the miners is bounty campaign. everybody competes to enter in this forum, increase rank and then follow bounty campaign for a profit. The good side is, the growing popularity of the crypto world in the eyes of the public.So this is a real problem that is now, I think it is necessary to put just stricter entry rules and then there will be fewer people and we will make more money.I see in Twitter there are about 2-3 thousands people. Its crazy. But if you join, everybody can do the same. Seems like in half a year we gonna have maximum ~40$ payment.
If the community is growing then it's a good thing because more and more people will share their knowledge about crypto currency and you might know they would invest on one of it. I don't see this is bad because if the ICO has reached their hard cap you still get what you deserved 
At present, there are a lot of facebook and twitter bounty participants, so there is less rewards. That's why, I have not been participating facebook and twitter bounty for some time.
Yeah sure, because cryptocurrency is grow up and so mony poeple know and interest to crypto.
And newbie is come again and again.
So, all bounty is always full off participant.
And newbie is come again and again.
So, all bounty is always full off participant.
I agree that there should be some rules in the bounty campaigns but what criteria to choose the best participants? I think the bonus campaigns just limit the number of bounty participants to a certain amount. Signing up early is a priority.
Your comments are quite reasonable and currently there are some projects that have done the way you have proposed. Sapien is a typical example. I was not able to participate in that bounty campaign and I was very disappointed not to update the news quickly. My friends have joined fast and they have a tremendous amount of bonuses.
Number of participants are actually increasing and only good bounty managers have toughen the rules but they can only do so much. Telegram campaigns are hard to maintain I guess as you can see many bots subscribing to multiple groups and posting random messages in every group and still no actions are taken.
Maybe because of this problem,and small profit for projects due to bad-quality promotion,devs decide to make bounties only for adequate people,who can really help to promote project not just with spam and copypasting.
Hope to see good-quality campaignes and not so many people
Hope to see good-quality campaignes and not so many people
A bounty program allows you to get various marketing tasks done that you might not have time for within your core team. It also allows you to get your project into different countries which is great for getting the word out worldwide. A bounty program is way better than being an intern because one you get compensated and you earn a dynamic value as you're able to bank on the projects success going forward.
I'm sure that when the market is green again, bounties will become even more popular then now. And so they will become less profitable. I started participating in them just to get some first income to start investing and trading, but now I see that I could earn much more doing some regular work such as freelancing...
All members must be different, I get more by joining the bounty even though now the bounty of the participants increases but the projects offered are also not small, in addition to our prize project, we can also see the progress of the project and if the project has good potential then I can participate in the purchase of tokens at the time of ICO, but for you if work more profitable, better focus with it and try the money generated from your work as an investment capital on ICO.
I agree that there should be some rules in the bounty campaigns but what criteria to choose the best participants? I think the bonus campaigns just limit the number of bounty participants to a certain amount. Signing up early is a priority.
That's why admins have come up with a new approach that's merit. to prevent spam and people working for bonuses.Yes, that is a very good idea. Those who update news quickly will have many benefits. That solution helps the bounty holders get more bonuses.
I agree that there should be some rules in the bounty campaigns but what criteria to choose the best participants? I think the bonus campaigns just limit the number of bounty participants to a certain amount. Signing up early is a priority.
I observed that too,it may or may not be a good thing.From the perspective of projects,it is,because it simply means there are more persons become aware of their project while for bounty hunters more competitions and less rewards.It however will not affect the profitably of investing directly in ICOs as only a small fraction of total sums raised from ICOs is dedicated to bounties,typically less than 5 per cent.The good part is that a lot of ICOs are in the market and in need of bounty hunters,so i dont think it will be saturated that soon.Pick your best 3 or 4 bounties and leave the rest for other hunters.Thanks for sharing
Yep that's right, there are too many participants in our social media campaigns and reward less than before. but it's does not matter for me if we are fair and not cheating. and for investor i think bounty hunter will become investor if they are interested with some project.
Yep, I think it is the right way when bounty hunter decides to join ICO of thr project in which he participates as bounty member.
But as topic starter said - as investors join bounty to not to s[end money on ICO - I think this is incorrect.
People who participates in ICO almost always havent got enough time make post here or on twitter and etc, they just buy and waiting for profit.
Also I think that bounty participants know more about the project then investors do
That is true! More and more people are doing bounty campaigns. That means that the cryptocurrencies are spreading. The idea on how to earn money encourages people to do bounty works. Regarding your concern with the large numbers of participants in a bounty, I think we should not worry about it because as the numbers of bounty hunters arise, so as the ICOs numbers are also arising. More than 10 ICOs are being introduced weekly, so there are lots of ICOs to choose.
Jump to: