Bounty and too many participants - page 124.

Tendou_Karen

member

Activity: 444

Merit: 13

https://streamies.io/

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Well yeah i am agree with you, as we can see the participant of Social Media Bounty Campaign are always more than 1000 participant.
I'm just hoping that bounty manager and the project owner should always have a cap / limit for each campaign, imo it would be better ..

adekogbe

member

Activity: 854

Merit: 21

Bounty programs has its advantage for both projects and the participants.
The issue of too many participants however lies only in some bounty programs like Facebook and twitter and I don't see why this is bad because it is really easy to complete Facebook and twitter bounties.

As regulations go, I like bounty programs that are managed by recognized and reputable bounty management team like Amazix and bountyx. The award fairly stakes earned and disqualify cheaters.
Bounties are good, just choose carefully your project.

bitcoinvestor

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 501

Quote from: bhantom on March 14, 2018, 11:18:47 AM

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

It is not a problem when there are too many participants in bounty campaign. More participants more popular the project. There are many bounty hunters in social media now. When google ban crypto ads, bounty participants are really important to an ICO project. Don't worry about that.

Bitmedrano040117

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 251

These problems concern social campaigns. In the signature campaigns, I noticed quite the opposite, very few participants. If ICO does not belong to the top category, then it is very difficult for him to recruit the normal number of participants in the signature campaign.

BeEvil

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 131

Quote from: Verde_Mantis on March 23, 2018, 05:29:10 PM

I think there is just on simple solution to avoid this problem, and it's to accept only a certain number of people in a bounty, then all those who arrive late are out. I'm not saying I wish this, I'm just trying to give an answer to your question. At the end it's a devs' decision I guess.

Yep, we all understand that limiting the number of participants is good for the rewards for the bounty campaign. But we must also understand that for projects, the payout/participant ratio is not important, and the more participants - the more hype and awareness. At the same time, there are projects that are without any advertising, with 10 sig. and 100 social participants take millions.

ROB18

full member

Activity: 380

Merit: 100

Correct so many people now joining bounty programs, and for me that is ok since it creates more awareness through a lot of people about projects. Currenty, bitcointalk already have there merit system in place and that's actually what makes it hard now to rank up in order to be paid nicely. Just keep providing valuable comments in the marketplace, it will come back to you in a nice way.

Verde_Mantis

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 52

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think there is just on simple solution to avoid this problem, and it's to accept only a certain number of people in a bounty, then all those who arrive late are out. I'm not saying I wish this, I'm just trying to give an answer to your question. At the end it's a devs' decision I guess.

WakinXXX

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 10

Yes during last time bounty popularized and a lot of people do it. My analysis saw me that manager fix all job correctly and cahnge rules to join and not all participants still alive in final of bounty camp

Rampagoe004

sr. member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 339

https://duelbits.com/

Yes if the campaign facebook and twitter is very difficult to make the rules,Besides in the campaign sosmed not in the rank so race incoming race, different premises signature campaign there is a new rank limit can enter

dashunka

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

it's not good for us when there are a lot of participants in the company's bounty and especially in the company of signatures. and investors as they were and will be and less of them will not be because it is a faster payroll.

varun bee

jr. member

Activity: 132

Merit: 2

i think in coming future we will be seeing in more strict rules like increase in no. of followers, certain no. of tweets, account age etc which are becoming more of a trend nowadays in all bounty campaigns. if increase in good icos keeps on matching with increase in no. of bounty hunters i think there won't be much problem, plus still there is a lot of money that crypto has to offer.

kakawin

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: Faeton on March 23, 2018, 03:35:43 PM

Quote from: CisColtz on March 14, 2018, 11:24:09 AM

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

I also agree that the participants in the campaign of generosity, namely the signature campaign is not so much. Several dozen people join the ICO projects, although the ICO team itself is interested in more participants. They, after all, allocate their tokens to the generosity campaign as a percentage of the total number of tokens produced, and therefore the more participants in the subscription campaign are, the more often their ads will appear. And tokens they vseravno allocate the same number.

If there are a lot of such participants for the participant of the campaign, he may not join such a campaign. So I do not see any problems here.

This system is built in such a way that it regulates itself. The more participants in the campaign bounty, the lesser the reward each participant will receive, hence after a certain number of participants joining, bounty participation becomes less profitable and bounty hunters will look for another project.

Harley Quinn

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

It is normal for exciting business like this to grow more saturated. The campaigns get what they want, their promotion - and the people who do the bounty hunting get what they deserve, their payment. It seems pretty fair to me. There should only be limited pools for bounty hunting where the rest is for investors to participate in.

dedet

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

in my opinion bounty dab too many participants is not a problem. a benefit to the project if many participants to promote the product is because their tokens sell and profit also for us. if the bounty project reaches har cap

ogini

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 10

The too many particpants is causing low payment and this is becoming meaning less because the payment worth nothing at the end of the day

Rrotess

member

Activity: 264

Merit: 10

Quote from: bhantom on March 14, 2018, 11:18:47 AM

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

Yeah i will agree.But because of many participants we can't make a huge profit on it not just because of the rank position but the participants which really upgraded also.

bitor

member

Activity: 210

Merit: 10

I think, that we will get reward, but the Terms of getting reward and doing posts will be more difficult

Faeton

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 11

Quote from: CisColtz on March 14, 2018, 11:24:09 AM

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

I also agree that the participants in the campaign of generosity, namely the signature campaign is not so much. Several dozen people join the ICO projects, although the ICO team itself is interested in more participants. They, after all, allocate their tokens to the generosity campaign as a percentage of the total number of tokens produced, and therefore the more participants in the subscription campaign are, the more often their ads will appear. And tokens they vseravno allocate the same number.

If there are a lot of such participants for the participant of the campaign, he may not join such a campaign. So I do not see any problems here.

petorosconk

newbie

Activity: 89

Merit: 0

if the participants bounty too much then the results are in just a little but I'm sure it is enough for daily needs

Khailequang334

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

airdrops and bounty become more popular and some of them are fake, people do not get the real token but they lost their private information

Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 124. (Read 10495 times)