Bounty and too many participants - page 126.

selenophile

member

Activity: 244

Merit: 10

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

they already implement a way to lessen some farm account. admin implemented merit system so alt account was having a hard time ranking it. its on the bounty manager to use it for good.

Shaminyue

newbie

Activity: 119

Merit: 0

Quote from: dillpicklechips on March 14, 2018, 11:24:13 AM

Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.

A also agree with you that number of participants sometimes doesn't affect much on the rewards as they usually join and quit during the campaign. Besides that, some of bounty campaigns reward their bounty based on the raised amount of tokens distribution. If many bounty join the campaign, they can get lots of potential investors also and increase the amount of tokens sold. Then, the reward for them will increase.

AteenaD

newbie

Activity: 208

Merit: 0

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

What is wrong with many new participants? What are you insinuating? Everybody has the right to earn. And i mean EVERYBODY. As long as we new participants do our job in a very appropriate and desirable way, we are all entitled to participate here. More regulations, rules? Is the new merit system rule still not appropriate to you? We are having a hard time getting ranked up to possibly earn more. As far as i am concerned, i will be stock to this rank even though i do constructive posts. I do my job by the rules diligently.

Hendrahendri

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 10

yes,I really like your topic,I usually follow bounty on facebook,we can see in his very many participants,even can reach thousands of participants,well! my very regret is a participant arbitrary arbitrary in the follow of bounty and not follow the rules,but they will still be in the same salary with the participants of the enterprising and follow the rules.

whatthesith

copper member

Activity: 301

Merit: 10

simply getting the job done

Quote from: Tylev on March 16, 2018, 03:52:43 PM

I think it's not worth worrying about the big competition in the campaigns of generosity. Recently, facebook and twitter have announced a ban on advertising campaigns ICO. Since June 1, the same ban will be in google. This will dramatically reduce the number of participants in the campaign of generosity in social networks. As for the participants in the signature campaign, there is and will be a gradual reduction there. A few months ago, the participants of this forum were more than 1 750 000, now the number of forum participants has decreased to just over 1,500,000 people. In addition, the system of awards introduced in January contributes to a sharp reduction in the number of participants, since it will be practically impossible to advance above the junior member, and especially above the member. Because of this, I think people will leave the forum. Long participants of the forum for various reasons will also leave, it was and will always be. Therefore, it seems to me that the services of signatory campaign participants, on the contrary, will be more in demand.

This is really good idea, but please tell me why you think that there will be less participant in social bounty campaigns? They ban ads no user´s content or? We will not be able to like and share content connected with crypto anymore? On this forum there is more than 1.5 mil members? Awesome, this I do not know, and agree with you,I am not satisfied with the new merit system, it is not good for me.

Galina12

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 21

Companies benefit from having more participants and paying them $ 10 for 2-3 months of participation. ICOs to have a higher chance of success and they may raise funds more quickly they have to accept participants as many as possible. I hope the bounty hunters after some time will stop participating for a small fee. Then good companies will set a limit for the bounty.

Spaffin

full member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 108

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

In fact, the limitation of the number of participants in the campaign of generosity is already taking place, however in a completely unexpected way. Facebook and Twitter have already announced the ban on advertising ICO, they are likely to be followed by other social networks. However, it is not yet clear to me whether such a ban will spread to the participants of the generosity campaign in these social networks. But the limitation of the participants in the signature campaign at this forum is really due to the introduction of the merit system. New members of the forum will not be able to get them practically, no matter how they try to write quality messages. In any case, at least until the full member of a hundred merits, they will collect for years. Therefore, there will be no special interest of newcomers to participate in the campaigns.

redhack

legendary

Activity: 1863

Merit: 1020

I don't think there are too many participants. Just look at how many people invest in these ICO's.
The biggest bounties have 5-6k people, not more. But there are a lot of investors etc.

alenahype

newbie

Activity: 210

Merit: 0

I think that it does not matter how many people will be honest because after that there is a thorough check and not everyone fulfills all the conditions of the bounty.

Ishiro5

copper member

Activity: 224

Merit: 3

With the way things are evolving in this space, many of these cryptos that do not have strong propositions will cease to exist, and many more woulkd have to be created to replace them. The space would become very big in a few years (at least few trillion dollars) due to increased adoption and cryptos playing mainstream in our day-to-day lives and many more tokens would need to be created to solve numerous challenges especially as digitalization is revolutionizing the way we do things faster than we can breathe.

novocaine

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 101

In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.

There are some good to this way and some pthers scam that waste your time..

Legendari

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Participants receive Bounty a lot, especially for company signatures. I think that the reduction in awards would reduce the number of participants in the bounty.

carrymentality

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: dillpicklechips on March 14, 2018, 11:24:13 AM

Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.

That's right, each bounty has their own criteria that tend to limit its participants, and also, over the course of a project, so many people actually come and go to those bounty campaigns because of different reasons. Say around 100 or more people enrolled in an ICO, by the end of the project there would only be around half or about half and a quarter left from its original participants with a few more joining say a month or two before it ends. Every person has his or her own strategy on how to win big even in this bounty campaigns.

WebTera

member

Activity: 322

Merit: 10

That is why I am now trying to squeeze out the maximum dividends from bounty, as it is increasingly difficult to get a decent amount of tokens because of the influx of participants.

Faroxx

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

Yes, bounty companies are really very popular now and have many hunters. I think that they will become even more unfortunately Cry

Boristhecat

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 629

The number of ICO is also increasing, so while this problem is not so acute.

alt-fire

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 104

too many participants in bounty companies, need to limit the amount.
it is difficult for the administrator to monitor more than 2000 participants

GandiwaSF

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 100

Just think positive, okay many new participants in the market now this reduce the rewards of others But i think that way to get potential buyers, because if the project is good, the buyers can work for bounty and invest in tokens sale and get the both.

goodrus69

member

Activity: 322

Merit: 10

Bounty campaigns are more and more popular, and the number bounty hunter in crypto grows with every day. Therefore, some managers limit the number of participants in their companies. I think this is the right decision and fully support it.

meaamir86

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 2

It is so profitable that hackers are hacking high traffic/followers social accounts and blogs, I faced the same as my old bitcointalk id was theft as well as Twitter account. was totally in misery but later I was able to recover my twitter account but failed to retrieve bitcointalk id ...
Lust/greed is now overtaking real hunters

Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 126. (Read 10495 times)