Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 127. (Read 10495 times)
The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. The more people willing to join bounty the more chances crypto world will grow and more big opportunities will be opened. Together as one we can make this crypto as bigger as it can be if we all unite and help each other not only for its success but for all.
maybe with that I think the competition among the participants will be tighter and for the future will grow taller.
I think there are some campaign manager that always limit the number of bounty participant for each campaign which I think it is one of the way to control and get quality results. however increasing the number of follower is not a bad idea e.g minimum follower of 2000 follower wont be a bad idea. However i think strict rules in some campaign such as content creation campaign are keeping away from participating in such campaign. Also bountyhive have implemented great rule which might make bounty participant be ban if he retweeted many tweets in one day
I think with this kind of competition in a healthy bounty participants will also be more valuable because now also a lot of bounty campaign that was launched.
I think someone has the right and deserves the opportunity to participate in the gift even if they are a newbie. It is time for them to learn more when they know there is a possibility that they will become investors in ICO. And that is good for the presence of alt coins.
In fact, if you are a newbie and you do not have a high-ranking account, then the chances that you will be able to earn a large amount of money are very small.Social campaigns does not really require ranks in bct, only numbers of friends or followers. So I think this is also a good start for newbies and beginners while they rank up and learn about the forum and cryptoworld. About the earnings, I agree that only a small chance can be earned by newbies, I experienced it too when I was starting here.
More and more people learn about cryptoworld, and opportunities to earn money. It is normal process that number of participants in bounty campaigns grows.
I think one person have some multiple account to join bounty campaign, maybe or most people more knowing about crypto and join some bounty campaign.
Yes. The more participants are good for ICO but not the best for bounty.
When you need to share bounty pool among too many people it can result with really poor earnings.
At the moment there is Bethereum bounty campaign.
They have more than 40.000 participants. And they are very proud because of it.
But wait a second. Guy who is first there. Who made hundreds refferal links wont get even one ETH because bounty pool will be divided between all of them.
I wont get even 1000 bethers at the moment. That is couple of bucks.
To work several months for that bounty reward is really funny.
I cant remember when was the last time I got some good rewards in twitter, facebook or telegram campaign.
Signature, reddit, medium and youtube are the best campaigns at the moment.
When you need to share bounty pool among too many people it can result with really poor earnings.
At the moment there is Bethereum bounty campaign.
They have more than 40.000 participants. And they are very proud because of it.
But wait a second. Guy who is first there. Who made hundreds refferal links wont get even one ETH because bounty pool will be divided between all of them.
I wont get even 1000 bethers at the moment. That is couple of bucks.
To work several months for that bounty reward is really funny.
I cant remember when was the last time I got some good rewards in twitter, facebook or telegram campaign.
Signature, reddit, medium and youtube are the best campaigns at the moment.
the bounty will soon die. Either here is no longer earned because of high competition. It is also worth considering that if the campaign involves 4,000 participants, then 30-50% of them are fakes
If there a lot of participant for bounty I think that is a good condition for the bounty program, participant can campaign the bounty and advertise people around the world so they want to join investation to support the project and it help the project success, so lets support ICO
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Actually, the more the participants are, the better for the ICO. Since they are doing this for advertisements of their project. So I dont think some regulations will happen especially in the social campaigns because it is more effective. That is why social campaign participants have less share in the bounties, because it was too easy for a job and the requirement is easier too than the other bounties (except airdrop though).
It is better to join if the campaign is new release. It is sure if you are payed. But I think that too many who join is good for the campaign. Because there are many participant that post their new project and this is the success of a campaign.
bounty programs is beginning to be popular and yes its true that the greater is the number of participants in a bounty program, the lesser is also of the value you'll earn. but how will it be regulated? i think bitcoin made a move on that by putting on "merit".
The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. It looks like you are worried about your personal profit in the bounty campaign. For the investor and the campaign itself, a large number of participants is the success of the project
yes the manager should take an action, strict in receiving the participants and limit the participants so that selected most qualified participants can get rewards according to their hard work
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I like it every time there's a new bounty campaign that has a great project with the famous team member of it because the first thing that comes to my mind is that this ICO will surely be successful in the future. Indeed, that as long as there are more participants in a bounty campaign, the reward of each participant will be less depending on the stakes. To be honest, there are some bounty campaigns who choose people with best members with best posts.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
If I think because bounty campaign has allocation per campaign (twitter, facebook, signature) I think it is difficult to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with it especially the high allocation.
Bounty campaigns are very popular and the main and number one reason why btc and cryptocurrency is known and spreading. People are very smart and intelligent when it comes to money thats why they are making and finding way to earn money and they easiest way is the bounty campaigns with many participants, for me thats the problem too many participants in a bounty thats why they are making and implementing more bounties so the cryptocurrency is being relevant in that way.
I understand your concern, many participant, many reward sharing so less reward for you. Now I hope you can understand also the real meaning of the word CAMPAIGNS is an activities that intended to achieve goals. So what we are doing in bounty campaigns is to promote the project to be known in the market if the less participant do you think its enough? All bounty hunters like to have big reward but also think the company goals is to be successfully known by using us for help.
People r now beginning to become curious and interested in joining.. And not just investor, but also participants in bounty campaign, the more participant the lesser or smaller the possible profit each could get or earned. There has to be some limitation like in one campaign like 150-300 participant only and well again it's still depend on the rules of the bounty campaign.
Jump to: