Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 66. (Read 10495 times)
I think bounty campaigns should be a form of advertising for initial coin offering which is under construction or is in the process of selling token. Many participants are synonymous with popularity. Its products and utilities are promoted to consumers or investors effectively. This is very important for the success of tokens and coin afterwards. For companies, it is beneficial and effective for them. But for the participants, that means they will choose the bounty by the competition and the reward benefits.
This is simply typical that bounty is getting to be well known on the grounds that they give a precise benefit just by doing some undertaking. Exceptionally to bounties that are genuine and a decent task they will be jammed in a matter of moments so better keep up.
It is really very nervous, I would suggest doing all the bounties of the campaign to limit the number of participants, so it will be better for everyone!
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I can understand that what you want to say in exact way , but here I would like to tell you that already lots of rules are made by this forum so that only limited numbers of the participants can enter in the bounty campaign and also only limited no. Of Campaign ( or only better quality campaign) can enter in this forum .What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
But here in the present time lots of traffic is coming in this forum and that is resulting into a big hard work to find out whether everyone doing Thier work perfectly or not .
Well here it may be possible to happen according to our own way if we can report low quality posts and non-qauality discussion in this forum to the moderators .
I do not understand the meaning of "the best participant". Everyone who is in crypto has the same rights. We all also have the right to join the ICO project bounty. if you do not want a lot of competitors, you certainly can choose bounty with a few participants. I think it does not matter many participants who participated enliven. It will also benefit the project team. If you want a bit of a competitor, maybe bounty managers can enact more stringent regulations. That way there will be only a few who really filtered and entitled to a bounty gift.
This is just normal that bounty is becoming famous because they give an accurate profit just by doing some task. Specially to bounties that are legit and a good project they will be crowded in no time so better keep up.
i dont think so, i think the rules its manger making not from members, when so many people joining of course the share will we get its will less, when you want get more for bounty joining in so not much people join like signature, blog, video creatif, at there not many people join, thats simple of you complain
Directly if many participant at bounty campaign, the reward of payment we got will be small. Because have to sent to all participant yet, but we could try the other campaign have small participant like signature campaign and blogger campaign or we could try very small participants is translation campaign. If there small of participant of bounty campaign, reward we could got will much and we can get payment of token more than bounty campaign have many participant.
I would like to the bounty rules have become more complex, it will weed out unscrupulous hunters, and will not allow the frauds that put their wallets under someone else's work... 
I think its not change to much but if you have high rank, and i think too many participants its just make too many spamers its critical, this forum is created for sharing information not for bounty and i think in here because bounty this forum changes function to bounty not for sharing
More participants joins bounty campaign because those rewards too high and everyone want it. Lots of programs have hard rules and most of people can't follow those rules and we still have high paying with those campaign.
now merit becomes an obstacle for many members here. I think this is very positive even though I myself feel overwhelmed to get merit. but with the merit, all can be overcome from the act of diversion like spamer and farmer
Yes this is really a problem, for those who started participating in Bounty Campaigns a long time ago. But for those who have just joined the world of crypto currency, this is a chance to get their first tokens. The time of the profitable Bounty Campaign has gone and now it's fun for beginners.
Yes the more now bounty participants as more and more new people who know the crypto world, yes can not be limited because the world wide Internet
Yes, the popularity of bounty is growing, a simple way to make good money. I now own 3 months ago did not participate in the campaigns and didn't know about them
Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.
The following bounty is a good opportunity to earn a pretty good income, but the allocation and the number of participants affect the number of tokens we will get, even though everyone wants to earn a better income and we can not forbid others to follow our bounty program following
More participants joins bounty campaign because those rewards too high and everyone want it. Lots of programs have hard rules and most of people can't follow those rules and we still have high paying with those campaign. So i think we don't need to care about number of participants and we just need to follow the rules to get high rewards.
In my opinion the more people the less you earn, but a lot depends on the company what will be the fee.
I'm more concerned with the problem of cheating when paying for our work. Very many managers in advance plan to deceive their bounty hunters. It worries me very much.
Jump to: