Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 65. (Read 10495 times)
Most people like free coins. Of course, they have to work hard and spend time doing some promotional work. Although they don't make a lot of profits, they are very good for free lunches. If a real investor, will trade directly, so that you can get coins faster and more.
That problem is hard to solve since the campaign itself is not that strict and thats the reason why so many people participate in it, so its a huge problem to regulate social media campaign and i doubt it will ever be change because its better for the company since social media is a big platform to spread news from.
Although more and more participants are very profitable from the ico because they will also get a bigger presentation to get a lot of investors. And some bounties give huge profit so many people are attracted to it.
yes, the more the participants are, the better for the ICO. Since they are doing more for advertisements of their project. i like, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.
I think we might feel that at times there are too many participants as the more that take part, the less reward we get. But for ICO's the more - the better so they won't mind, and anyone feels that it's no longer worth their time and effort, it's their choice not to join in.
I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.
I'm currently participating in a campaign that has a limit on the number of participants, and I'm very happy about it. Such campaigns are very rare. I think that this is a good approach and the campaign will be successful. I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.
I do not think that the bounty managers are complaining because of too many participants. It is exactly what they were aiming for which is why they are doing the bounty campaigns in the first place, to get as many people involved in the project as possible and spreading the word to many potential investors which is the reason bounty allocations are high.
I think we might feel that at times there are too many participants as the more that take part, the less reward we get. But for ICO's the more - the better so they won't mind, and anyone feels that it's no longer worth their time and effort, it's their choice not to join in.
I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.
I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.
So many bounties nowadays require thousands of participants and these participants in turn get few rewards since the amount of Eth invested into the campaign is too small and the participants are so many that each has to be served accordingly. Some bounties too have limited number of participants and the money invested is too small for the campaign. As it stands now, I don’t know but if bounty managers can find ways and means to limit the number of participants. It is an insinuation so please let us know yours.
That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.
Precisely as my thought!
Yes, we are aware of this saturated bounty pools. As the crypto community grow bigger, this things were expected to happen. But, don't they have the same chance as everyone here to start their journey in crypto community? If the bounty managers only prefer the highest rank, it'll discourage the newcomers. Also, the 'quality' we talked here, in what kind of measurement? If it comes to article/blog writing or translations, we could judge this accordingly. But, if it comes to Twitter, Facebook or any Social Medias campaign, how can we differentiate anyone?
This has always been a problem for the crypt from the day I first decided to do it.It's risky, interesting and overcrowded ..
Only tough bounty hunters will survive 
If newbies get low comissions, they will quit bounties and reward will increase.
If newbies get low comissions, they will quit bounties and reward will increase.
Actually, the more the participants are, the better for the ICO. Since they are doing this for advertisements of their project.
People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. Because the desire for money is one of the strongest motivations.
People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. Because the desire for money is one of the strongest motivations.
It is really very nervous, I would suggest doing all the bounties of the campaign to limit the number of participants, so it will be better for everyone!
On the one hand, restrictions are good for the participants, on the other hand it's bad for the project. We need to find an equilibrium point so that everyone is happy. I do not know whether to actually do it. But something needs to be done because the overall level of participants is very much falling. 
I am very glad that there are bounties and that this sphere is developing. just a great chance for a very easy earnings on cryptocurrency
Hello all, Don't miss out on our Presale
It offer's the very best price you can enjoy
Presale price: $0.01
Main sale price: $0.05
The Presale last till June 15, 2018
Join now https://tokensale.nwpsolution.com
Check out web version of MVP on landing. http://beta.nwpsolution.com/#/access/signin
It offer's the very best price you can enjoy
Presale price: $0.01
Main sale price: $0.05
The Presale last till June 15, 2018
Join now https://tokensale.nwpsolution.com
Check out web version of MVP on landing. http://beta.nwpsolution.com/#/access/signin
increasing the number of participants is very cool and good. so this is not a fraudulent project and you can really trust it , this is my opinion
it seems to me that the projects are designed for the number of participants that are at the moment and I absolutely disagree with you. parties don't happen much in my personal opinion
I think that soon to participate in bounty campaigns will simply not be profitable because of the large number of participants. In a couple of years, when more people will know about it, you will make a maximum of 10-20 dollars a week.
There may not even be a bounty for many years later, because at that time the ICO's review will be very severe and ICO cannot issue tokens casually.
I also find it problematic to have too many participants ON THOSE WHO ARE DEEMED PROFITABLE endeavors. There are bounties that has few participants also.
I think that soon to participate in bounty campaigns will simply not be profitable because of the large number of participants. In a couple of years, when more people will know about it, you will make a maximum of 10-20 dollars a week.
Jump to: