Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 67. (Read 10495 times)
Sometimes I want to complain with the bounty managers about the number of participants and ask to set the limit of the number participants in their campaign. but I can't be that greedy because the goal of bounty is for the promotion of an ico project, meaning the more the number of promotions the more likely the ico will be successful.
Yes, many participants in this altcoin is Social media like facebook and twitter are partcipate to introduce and recognize to social their campaign or projects bounty is the best like other forum because here is work together.
In the world of bounty i thinks the slogan that should trend here should be the larger the participants the better, for any bounty to have a higher chance of scaling through their should be plenty participants to ensure a wider publicity of the project so too may prarticipants is not a problem rather should be seen as a blessing in disguise.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Bounty campaign is an opportunity for everyone. I don't see any reason why it needs another rules just because there are too many new participants are joining. Being greedy is a bad habit, that is the real problem and not the popularity of bounty campaign. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It seems to me that increasing the number of participants is a normal process. I think it is quite possible that in a year or two Bounty will have a completely different appearance, not the same as now.
This is not a problem, there are a lot of bounty campaigns. Some do not even have 100 participants, and so you can earn good money. If the campaign involves more than 1000 people, then it is not worth registering.
Tell me, which campaign has only 100 participants? Some worthless ICO maybe..
This is not a problem, there are a lot of bounty campaigns. Some do not even have 100 participants, and so you can earn good money. If the campaign involves more than 1000 people, then it is not worth registering.
Yeah ! It is very common too have many participants in bounty campaigns nowadays because there are too many people that newly engage their self into cryptocurrencies and most of them are lack of money to start trading or investing in an ICO, that's why they joining bounty programs to earn rewards that can they use for their future investments in crypto trading.
The bounty managers should be stricter with what they allow, obviously a lot of people are multi accounting. Most of the bounty managers don't really care though.
Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!
A good option would be to limit places for bounty participants. If they set limits, then it will be possible to forecast payments in a particular company.
The rules of bounty campaigns are now getting tighter. There are also restrictions on participants and using self-identity. Not everyone can follow bounty campaigns, because they spend time and thoughts. To get a lot of money, it will certainly choose to invest rather than follow bounty campaigns, because time is very valuable. The rewards of the bounty campaigns are not many, and we should be able to respond with a graceful chest. Because we do not need capital to make a profit.
Since there are merit rules the participant of the signature campaign has been reduced, and other campaigns such as videos and blogs become alternatives.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.
Aside form being reduced, all thanks to merit system, the quality of posts from each participant are now improving.
Merit system has it's own strengths with positive impacts, but also has its drawbacks. Trade-offs if we put it.
Number of participants can be a measure of legitimacy of project and trust. So having a lot of participants is not always a problem, but not always a good thing. But we should not limit participants wishing to promote the project.
that is the way to keep everything running well, with the rules also don't limit us even become better in the search bounty now because it isn't only sought spam but has begun to be demanded our quality also in posting that is good a rule and for the future even better and the rewards will be more and the needs of investors are also guaranteed.
Since there are merit rules the participant of the signature campaign has been reduced, and other campaigns such as videos and blogs become alternatives.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes, there are already too many participants in the bounty campaign, i really agree with that, but we just need to work hard to get paid for our work. all we can do now is keep support and promote the ICO we're participated even there are too many participants out there, it's still very worth to do.
I think this is a big problem. More participants mean less reward. For some time, I check spreadsheet and if there are too many participant, I dont participate. But ı noticed that each bounty has too many participants. The bounty managers should limit the participan number. There must be a First comes first serve method.
I think that bounty hunters are multiplying on daily basis. They are so many that you won't even earn anything after the bounty program.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes you are right, indeed more and more participating the less the rewards are also in the can. Many people participate because in my opinion, bounty is the easiest way to make money by following some rules and of course make a lot of people want to participate in bounty.
But there are more ICO nowadays so its okay if there are more participants, they have right to earn more from ICO. Its better because when they have money from ICO, they will invest in ICO. So this industry will be huge.
I think if you can not make enough money, people will move on. And this is no different, balance will be found constantly, and will always evolve to find a new equilibrium.
It will never happen, but what will happen is that those who are in an area with a higher cost of living will stop doing it.
Jump to: