Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 72. (Read 10495 times)
It makes sense to take part in companies where a limited number of people from the very beginning!
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
One option would be to restrict the bounty participants to Senior Members and higher up. But then, it will affect the growth in user-base for the crypto-currencies. But for starters, we could ban the Newbies and Junior Members from participating in the bounties.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Actually I get your point but I think it is really hard to organize or to maintain because some bounties takes almost a month just to post updates in stake and what if they also choose the better participants in their campaign ? It would really take some time.
The ICO team has no hard and fast requirements for the number of participants in each reward thread.
Most of the time, the more people are involved, the happier the team will be, because the more people help to promote it.
Most of the time, the more people are involved, the happier the team will be, because the more people help to promote it.
I think it would be unfair to have this regulations in bounty programs. New members just wanted to have an extra income like us, so let them join bounty campaigns too.
Many, the so-called "new" members, are multi-accounts of already existing people. And the biggest problem, in my opinion, is when the project stretches the campaign for several months. During this time, the campaign fill with a huge number of bounty hunters and payments become simply ridiculous.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Regulations as in getting governments involved or do you mean just more strict rules?
Competition can be good. Everybody should be given a fair chance to participate - there are enough obstacles as it is. Early bird catches the worm. And yes, it takes more effort to earn the same income as was previously the case. The free market will push those who cannot afford to participate out at the end of the day. The best ones will remain. My two satoshis.
It is the right of every person to share what they want and if the ICO starter want to pay them for it then it is not bad for anyone.
Day by day maney people are including bounty campaign. That's the very easy campaign in bounty. I like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, YouTube video marketing campaign. Also signature campaign its a very difficult buy i can do it. I have more experience in bounty. I like bounty because it's a very easy sector and also some people in the campaign in this sector.
yeah. because of too many participants in bounty campaigns. This will great impact on the rewards for each participants. The more the lower you will get. So practically, you will be more rewards if theres a limit for participant counts.
Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!
Why would the projects limit the number of participants?
Who is the main concern of the project manager? The project or the bounty hunters?
More participants means a lot better coverage and better chance to reach hard cap.
I don't think that is OK to limit the participants. This is not in the best interest of the projects.
A lot of participants is good for the project because they want to spread the news as far as possible and having a lot of participants can certainly help. It's different though for the participant because they will get less reward than before.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Regulations as in getting governments involved or do you mean just more strict rules?
Competition can be good. Everybody should be given a fair chance to participate - there are enough obstacles as it is. Early bird catches the worm. And yes, it takes more effort to earn the same income as was previously the case. The free market will push those who cannot afford to participate out at the end of the day. The best ones will remain. My two satoshis.
this topic attracts all: both developers and scammers .. so every month there are hundreds of new ICO (and this is only visible in the information field projects), and it becomes extremely difficult to choose those startups that will be successful.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think it is not better to restrict more people to join bounty but have to allow to join more and more people as these people will then invite other people to join the project and they will invite investors to invest in the project and so the community of that project will be much wider and the project will then get the required success and your coins will bring worth for you. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
At present, there are a lot of facebook and twitter bounty participants, so there is less rewards. That's why, I have not been participating facebook and twitter bounty for some time.
The number of participants today can show the interest of the community to the project, it may be that today it is possible to check the quality of the project and the guarantees of payments in this way, think if suddenly such a large number of people can not get honestly earned tokens from the bounty, what will happen next?
Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).
Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaignsNothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).
Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaignsNothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).
Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaigns
I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. And they usually do youtube, signature, article and other difficult companies
Jump to: