Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 71. (Read 10495 times)
Maybe that is the purpose of the campaign, popularizing the project and cryptocureency in general. If the community or bounty participant does not increase, maybe our campaign is not working, and crypto will not grow.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It can't be helped cause many people wanted to earn free money. But i do think so many of them that sign up on bounty not doing they job so well. It would be good if there is a rules and only let good participants to join the bounty programs. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes, more and more people are participating in the bounty campaign. If a project attracts many participants, then I think its value can be recognized. With more and more people, I believe that in the future there will indeed be more rules and requirements.
It's inevitable that a good ICO project will attract a lot of bounty hunters.
So I think a good bounty hunter will not only have to do the bounty, but also invest in some good projects, so that he can get more profit.
So I think a good bounty hunter will not only have to do the bounty, but also invest in some good projects, so that he can get more profit.
Is not there a regulation in every ICO project in Bounty program?
With the development of Cryptocurrency in the world, it will automatically add people who follow Bounty Program.
They all have the right to follow it and it is a challenge for us to be the best because there are also many rivals.
With the development of Cryptocurrency in the world, it will automatically add people who follow Bounty Program.
They all have the right to follow it and it is a challenge for us to be the best because there are also many rivals.
Perhaps all the projects have created their own rules for bounty participants, and I think the goal is to accommodate all the communities. Because however the main purpose of the campaign, in addition to adding investors is to increase the community.
no, i don't agree with you. we don't have too many participant yet. when we do. you will know that you have. it will be heard from peoples mouth.
If there are many participants of the bounty , there will be many bounty for participants to join too.
That's mean it's totally fair and nothing weird or unfair is happening at all.
People want to have a job and bounty is a place where people getting jobs and that's all , very simple.
That's mean it's totally fair and nothing weird or unfair is happening at all.
People want to have a job and bounty is a place where people getting jobs and that's all , very simple.
Maybe that's the reason why there is a change in the rank increase system in this forum, but I think more and more communities will get better for this industry. And market capitalization will not grow without a new community.
There is nothing can be done about it since you aint the bounty manager. It will make a whole lot of sense if limit number of particioants are introduced tho.
One option would be to restrict the bounty participants to Senior Members and higher up. But then, it will affect the growth in user-base for the crypto-currencies. But for starters, we could ban the Newbies and Junior Members from participating in the bounties.
One option would be to limit the members of generosity to full members and lower. This will greatly affect the growth of the user base of crypto-currencies. Senior members will not engage in meaningless participation in generosity, but will use their invaluable experience to develop crypto, create new projects and attract new users. Invaluable experience and knowledge of senior members should not be spent on meaningless making money. Senior members should devote themselves only to the development of to crypto! And the lower ranks are allowed to participate in the bounty, this is an excellent motivation for attracting newcomers.
Everything ends, even the bounty theme render itself obsolete.
Make your business now and don't have to cry then.
Make your business now and don't have to cry then.
This is disaster. Having lots of participants in bounty campaign. It would make smaller the reward.
Yes, the popularity of such earnings is growing constantly. Therefore, it is necessary to wait only for the fall in profits and soon it will be difficult at all to earn
Today we participate in bonuses we will receive very little tokens, not offset the effort we have spent. So I think now finding another lucrative market to make money is justified. Future bonuses will no longer worth the effort we spend.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Nice sharing your ideas here. More participants in a campaign, less rewards you can earn. You can earn just a peny or maybe less than that. Other participants were cheating, they used fake accounts or joining more campaigns without doing their work. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There are a number of programes out there and a number of bounty participants too
Yes too many participants in one ico just because bitcoin is becoming popular and lots of people especially those who have no permanent job and they find that in joining bitcoin they can become rich.
the growth of participants is the biggest problem in the bounty, I think that because of this bounty will cease to be relevant and profitable.
I think all the Bounty campaigns must have a participants limit in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It is also a good idea to make a rating of bountyhunters to let the project select only the best for their companies
Jump to: