Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 73. (Read 10495 times)
I do not think that this is a problem. There are other services where rivalry is much more than 5000 people in the campaign. Therefore, it is very good that there are not so many participants as could be
Generally speaking, bounty campaigns are good for the development of cryptocurrency.
Lots of people get to know cryptocurrency because of it.
When google and facebook banned crypto ads, bounty campaigns become more important.
Lots of people get to know cryptocurrency because of it.
When google and facebook banned crypto ads, bounty campaigns become more important.
Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).
Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!
Bounty compaign is very popular because it can be followed by jr member or new member, so many jr members who follow bounty to get profit
And every day worse and worse , more and more participants come every day
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Perhaps we should be more smart choose the bounty with the project is good, and also more selective in choosing bounty because a lot of bounty scam, and to dev more selective in choosing participants.
I participate of the bounty campaigns on Twitter, but recently it has become much less profitable. Now I prefer to participate in the company's signature
I think this is logical, the number of people in the community is increasing every day . therefore, the number of participants in the bounty is growing
Bounty campaign is the most prevalent project these days yet not all bounty campaign has numerous members since they have restrictions and not all campaign is accessible constantly. Beside that, we as a whole realize that when you are taking an interest in an bounty with numerous members then you ought to expect that you will get less rewards in light of the fact that numerous individuals are taking part.
I remember when the bounty started, the projects paid a lot . But now when people very many , pay very little ...
There is indeed such a problem, many new participants join bounty activities, especially Twitter and Facebook. But I think this is a good situation. These social media are very good for the spread of encryption projects, and the only thing we feel regrettable is that the project has not increased the payment of the reward.
Bounty campaigns is the most popular campaign nowadays but not all bounty campaigns has many participants because they have limitations and not all campaigns is available all the time. Aside from that, we all know that when you are participating in a bounty with many participants then you should expect that you will receive less rewards because many people are participating.
when a lot of people are involved in bounty,it's not so scary for the money you get,because when more and more people come to the project it is good for him,the investment becomes more and more
I think you're right , more and more people are getting into bounty every day ...
I agree with most of the comments . a lot of people in generosity , we need to come up with something to limit the number of participants
There are many equally good bounties out there limiting the number of participants. You just need to do your survey and fish out the good ones. You can also try and partake in the other campaigns like reddit, signature, translation and ambassador if any. These campaigns usually have few number of participants as compared to the social media (facebook/twitter).
I remember when bounty was attended by several times fewer people than now . Earnings in bounty fell very much
It is so true that there are a lot of people to participate right now. Bounty are going on new dimension of attracting talent and sharing knowledge on blockchain cryptocurrencies and ico it is a win-win situation for both long way to go. But if you think about it, this industry will also grow. Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of theme hunters are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. It is not possible that bounty program will grow too. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated in the bounty campaign. So we just need to hope and pray so that there are more people who use this forum to promote their business.
This mean more and more people are interested in bitcoin, to somehow earn money only those who behind it or those campaign manger or developer scrutinize or check carefully those who join so that the quality of bounty participant will still remain.
Jump to: