Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 74. (Read 10495 times)
One thing is also assured when many joiners are joining in one campaign under a project manager it means that this project is well known to them maybe to their previous works or ICO projects and they are already rewarded plus the token reaches the exchange and shown a very steady growth for the past weeks, now that the same project team will start a new one, of course, many will join again with the new peoples, only the award is becoming small but you can token direstly to the project to have more token with you.
I think when a lot of people take part in the campaign bounty it shows that the project promises to be good, but of course it's a pity when from a lot of people get a smaller reward
Yes indeed it is good for getting profit but it is not that easy to get bigger profit now because theyre is a lot of participant and it is normal for it which its good because it has a lot of potential to success
I agree with you, in bounty every day more and more people . It would be nice if there are any restrictions
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What can we do? You just have to bear with it. We can do nothing about this. And so it is either we will have to accept it or get out of the kitchen. We know that this forum is growing and growing very fast. Creating an account on this forum is easy. The same goes to Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Steemit, and so on. Bounty participation is therefore very easy thus resulting to a high turnout.
Bounty are going on new dimension of attracting talent and sharing knowledge on blockchain cryptocurrencies and ico it is a win-win situation for both long way to go
yes of course. in 2018, we can see huge number of members are participating to the bounty campaigns. it is a huge increase. so i think near future bounties will be no longer profitable. as a example bountyhive of colorlessK. you can see the number of participation at a glance. more than 15,000 20,000 members are register on it. so i dont think each member will earn at least 50$-100$
Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of theme hunters are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated in the bounty campaign.
If there is a gain in the free market, it is normal that there are too many participants. For this reason, we need to do our job without being angry with it. You do not have to be too selfish.
More people - less profit in one hand and more different Bounties in another. It's better to take part in those which are more limited campaigns. Here is a kind of regulation, not so many participants in translation and moderation, media.
I think there's no wrong for havimg too many participants in bounty campaign particularly in social media campaign. This things happened when merit system implemented because there are members that stock on their current rank so all them think it is more difficult to earn bounty tokens through signature campaign. So instead of participating jn signature campaign they grab the opportunity to earn profits by participating in social media campaign.
As long they have more friends and followers in their social media account they could possibly earn more. We know that in social media campaign there's no need any ranking system in social media campaign.
There's no wrong in participating social media campaign, the important is they do their job well and they don't break any rules and regulations.
Thank you.
As long they have more friends and followers in their social media account they could possibly earn more. We know that in social media campaign there's no need any ranking system in social media campaign.
There's no wrong in participating social media campaign, the important is they do their job well and they don't break any rules and regulations.
Thank you.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
You have point, So amazix team adjust their rules and add the following rule. Some people didn't follow their rules so its disqualified. I think that's better, Because if all people was bounty hunter. There is no investor that can invest on ICO, Its better to include a limit for each campaign. better is 1500 People for Facebook campaign same on Twitter, 1000 People for signature campaign. This is needed because for me the rewards is fix and participants and stakes is not. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
This would be the decision of the bounty manager if he want to limit the participants in his bounty campaign. On the ICO's point of view, they want more people to participate in their campaign so that many people will know of their project. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There are so many participants because like you , everyone else wants to earn too. Maybe bounty campaigns should limit only the bounty participants they will be accepting but the more parricipants the more it helps promoting the project in which it can attract more investors. Other than that I don't know what regulations should be implemented. Everyone deserves to join as long as you are not cheating.
Bounty campaigns are getting harder these days. As you said many participants.
But there are more ICO nowadays too, so you can choose from.
But there are more ICO nowadays too, so you can choose from.
The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. It looks like you are worried about your personal profit in the bounty campaign. For the investor and the campaign itself, a large number of participants is the success of the project
There are a lot of Bounty Hunters and ico's don't keep their promises, and the bounty are no longer low and no deliveries.
Really, the last six months, we big inflow of persons interested to participate in bounty - campaigns observes. The competition grows, among ICO projects more and more deception appears.
I think that in the future many bounty-managers will enter KYC for the projects and it will allow to eliminate robots.
I think that in the future many bounty-managers will enter KYC for the projects and it will allow to eliminate robots.
KYC is not a good idea and even the adding has spoken against it. Even the crypto is essentially against this idea. This can be even dangerous for some members here to reveal their real identity as they are dealing with huge money or transactions on this forum itself under an anonymous name.
Yes, bounty campaign is getting more and more popular, and there are many new participants also, but it doesn't mean with more participants we earn less rewards for bounty campaign. In fact, there are many bounty campaigns which they didn't limit their participants.
We`ll not see less participants with u, the more this direction develops, the more participants will be in any business, and the crypto will not be an exception. But all this will only facilitate the involvement of new people in crypto, and this is very good news, at least for me. Success in this direction depends only on the number of people.
Jump to: