Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 77. (Read 10495 times)
You know, i dont care how many participants take part with me. I worry about how many scam around. Thats crazy. Take part, promote it few month, they collect money and from this time just silence. Look at Envion and Hdac. Huge ICOs, and what do we see. They scammed all bounty participants
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I agree with you! Interest in cryptocurrencies is growing stronger and stronger every day, and in bounty companies there are more and more participants. To earn good money, you need to participate in at least 30-40 companies, and it is quite time-consuming. Personally, I have an interest in the bounty begins to disappear, it's just a pity his time. It is more reasonable to engage in trading. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
My friend told me about bounty and signature campaigns and thanks to that this forum has changed a lot. But I understand, everybody wants money, but we have to do marketing in a good way!
why wont they have many participant because all bounties do give a free token in which you can sell to help you financially,,moreso no money to invest in coins,,so people hve seen a sort ways to earn free token anfmoney without using their money to buy any coins,,so that is the reasons that bounty have alot of participant
participants a lot but few of them perform their work qualitatively sometimes they are bots and of course every month more people learn about it and many join in as this convenient work a day does not take much time and one can get a good reward
I do not think that there are too many people in signature campaigns and that it is necessary to take some measures to restrict participants. Sometimes in some ICO campaigns, up to a dozen people participate, in very promising - several hundred. Therefore, everyone has the right to choose their ICO and participate in it. At this forum recently and so many restrictions have been introduced and it is no longer worth continuing this practice. Everyone has the right to choose which campaign to join. If someone seems to have too many participants and therefore many tokens will not be counted, he can choose another campaign. There are a lot of them at the forum and there are plenty to choose from.
In addition, the restriction of participants in the campaign of generosity is not beneficial to the ICO campaign, which allocates a certain number of tokens produced and the more participants of the forum advertise their ICO, the better for them.
In addition, the restriction of participants in the campaign of generosity is not beneficial to the ICO campaign, which allocates a certain number of tokens produced and the more participants of the forum advertise their ICO, the better for them.
I think it is very difficult to overcome this, except maybe by limiting the number of participants, for example I observe there are some bounty campaign signatures limited to 150 participants, this kind of thing maybe can applied to social media bounty campaign.
When I started making money on bounty - there was not such a large number of participants. And now sometimes in a Twitter campaign I see 10 thousand people, 70% of them are bots and multi-accounts. This is a huge figure. As a result, each participant receives for his work 5-10 bucks in tokens. Great, if the bounty manager keeps track of it and removes the scammers.
Too many participants, I think, is a good thing for the reward, because the reward is to promote and expand the community participants, and to be better exposed to the project. This will attract more and more investors.
Just like a period ago about 4-5 months ago. In airdrop campaigns. There are some very high value airdrops and people pay attention to them. And now most airdrop is not worth much as before.
I doubt any change in the near future. How do you choose the best actor for social rewards? Even a boy can cope with social rewards, so there are always a lot of participants. Another thing that creates content.
yes maybe the board should be able to choose who the right person to choose from. I as a new member already feel it, I am afraid in the future earnings will shrink. but it's back again in each other's fortune
I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns.
People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. Merit system already limited signature campaigns
Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us
That is why I focused more on signature campaigns instead of multimedia campaigns since that type of bounty usually have a lot of participants since it is much easier and as I observed the harder tha campaign is the fewer the participants and the better the reward will be.
I once proposed that if bounty managers want to make campaigns more stringent, then they may decide to use a merit system like that which is done on BTT. It could help the quality of campaigns, especially signature campaigns.
There are some bounties limits the participants, they depend on the allocation that they have. Some says the higher the community the higher the chance to make the project auccessful and vice versa.
For me, the more new participants, the more morale we work in seeing bounty. If we assume that by adding new participants in each bounty project it will be reduced in return, it seems our assumption is not good. Because in all activities bounty aims to facilitate.
i think if so many people participants its good, i mean the project of that bounty is good and not scammer, because profesional people in this forum know about where is bounty scammer and not scamer so, we just follow it and learn about that
I don't think campaign managers will spend time in choosing a perfect participants because as I know they are busy in their works and telegram question of the people who are asking about their campaign. No offense with this but I think if you want to get more profit you must join a campaign that has a strict manager with a limited slot only that you get a big profit into it.
Well that bounty is good but do not expect big profits in their because the share on iy was percentage but if the parcipants failed to do the work their will be kick and you will gain a lot of profits
Jump to: