Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 82. (Read 10495 times)
Today there are really a lot of people who want to take part in the promotion of projects, there are a lot of projects on the market today, but very often it happens that many projects are simply not interesting to people, therefore they simply do not gain funds for life or for further development. You need to choose projects correctly and from the investor's point of view, only so you can find projects for the bounty.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There are not too many participants. There are just too many dumb alt accounts.
Seriously people we need KYC now. -_-
I really hate cheaters.
There are less bounties than before at the moment, i dont know why it is really happening.
but yeah, i am always trying to participate in those programs who has less participants than the others, because they are much more profitable.
but yeah, i am always trying to participate in those programs who has less participants than the others, because they are much more profitable.
Bounty for me now is a complete deception. Very few worthwhile projects that pay well and develop their idea
Quite alright I want to agree with you that there are too many bounty participants. The truth of the matter is that many people want to hunt for something much better to augment their source of income. One doesn't need to worry about that since nothing good is meant for one person. I think what is very essential to every bounty hunter is how each individual will come up by mapping out ways in which they can improve more in their own hunting. Another thing that should be clearly noted is that not all all bounty programs just accept participants hook line and sinker like that,some bounty do screen their participants very well before granting them acceptance to the bounty program.
in telegram i am more frustrated because of the number of cheaters.i was shock when i see my name in the spreadsheet that someone used my account not only once but more of them in different bounty,becaused of that 1/2 of cheaters or bot with them the rest of the reward comes.it's bad for those who are cheating on account.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
my opinion you are too greedy. way of thinking like this I think very much the allocation of funds is very clear pembagianya if you feel with the increase of participants fewer earnings I suggest you follow the project more. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think are not too many participants, ofc is more popular than before but this is not affecting everyone's profit you can still make profit, are lots of good bounties which the rate pay is very attractive and I'm sure in the future we will have awesome bounties.
i think you should just limit the number of participant in any campaign and add more task with that you can easily identified those that are ready to work, don't be tough ok
The ICO program is now much faster than in previous years.
This raises the enthusiasm of the Bounty Hunter especially on the segment of Twitter and Facebook campaign programs.
Indeed more and more who follow the results will be obtained less.
But the rules remain in ICO organizers, all eligible to follow, as the program seeks the best.
Not the rules also exist, eg followers how many and other rules.
This raises the enthusiasm of the Bounty Hunter especially on the segment of Twitter and Facebook campaign programs.
Indeed more and more who follow the results will be obtained less.
But the rules remain in ICO organizers, all eligible to follow, as the program seeks the best.
Not the rules also exist, eg followers how many and other rules.
Then just dont join those bounties and that is it, no one is forcing you to join all those bounties that are asking for huge participants in there.
No offense, but there are dozens of bounties on this forum awaiting for you to join
No offense, but there are dozens of bounties on this forum awaiting for you to join
In any case, in the end, there will be a balance. The number of incoming and outgoing will be approximately the same. If the earnings for a person are small, then he will not work and he will leave. Thus, others will earn more.
Already there is a sufficiently large number of participants who are ready to promote projects for a fee of less than $ 15, so they will in the future be bounty hunters.
I think that it is the most ideal to use a maximum amount of participants for every piece of bounty campaign. I see in some campaigns that there are 5000 participants for only Facebook or Twitter. If the total pool for that part of the bounty is less than 10% then you earn only a few dollars for a few weeks of work.
I think it's a good idea to regulate and limit the number of participants participating in the Bounty campaigns lower the participants the higher the reward for each of the participants I see some of the Bounty Campaign and Campaign managers that are limiting the participants and needs full member and higher ranks for you to participate. now Bounty Campaigns is getting popular in different countries but it's better for the ICO to have many participants for it to become popular and have a higher price in the near future.
Choosing a good bounty campaign was now very difficult. 100 ethereum prizes and 10,000 attendees. then we can win very few awards. many people are now aware of this and many people are participating in the campaign
A bounty program is way better than being an intern because one you get compensated and you earn a dynamic value as you're able to bank on the projects success going forward.
It is so profitable that hackers are hacking high traffic/followers social accounts and blogs, I faced the same as my old bitcointalk id was theft as well as Twitter account. was totally in misery but later I was able to recover my twitter account but failed to retrieve bitcointalk id ...
Lust/greed is now overtaking real hunters
Lust/greed is now overtaking real hunters
I think that it is necessary to impose a restriction on the number of participants. Because in the near future will join the bounty companies more and more people, and now it's too much.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
For me, it's inevitable scenario since a lot of thread here in forum alone sprouted like mushroom and so many people get curious and read on about it. We can't control people joining the campaign especially more people searching for an extra income online that leads them here in the forum. That is why bounty managers limit the participants so that doing bounty becomes lucrative rather than get frustrated for getting minimal tokens.
However, huge participants in the bounty campaigns are definitely good for ICOs because this is the main purpose why "bounty hunting" exists in the first place. To spread the news about ICOs profile and their projects they are offering.
Jump to: