Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based

yarelydiaz

copper member

Activity: 560

Merit: 64

Quote from: ultrloa on February 17, 2019, 07:50:39 PM

Quote from: publicjud on February 17, 2019, 05:06:31 PM

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

In my opinion both of them could be good and bad. It depends on many factors and, for example, if some campaign has a lot of participants fixed token reward will not be so bad option. I think that both types are fair enough.

For seeing the market situation, I doubt fix token rewards will be worth since we don't know if the price of the token rewards will go to it's ICO price and it will be a huge burden nor a waste of time if the one we collected in fix rewards will be so low and didn't even reach eve half of it's ICO value, so much really better if we can get a stake based since a huge possibilities that we can earn more from it.

Well, "didn't even reach eve half of it's ICO value" - if all the tokens I receive would have half the price - I would be happy. Half the price is actually fantastic, now the best indicator is 10% of the ICO price. In General, I agree with @publicjud, both systems have rights to exist.

ultrloa

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1228

Quote from: publicjud on February 17, 2019, 05:06:31 PM

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

In my opinion both of them could be good and bad. It depends on many factors and, for example, if some campaign has a lot of participants fixed token reward will not be so bad option. I think that both types are fair enough.

For seeing the market situation, I doubt fix token rewards will be worth since we don't know if the price of the token rewards will go to it's ICO price and it will be a huge burden nor a waste of time if the one we collected in fix rewards will be so low and didn't even reach eve half of it's ICO value, so much really better if we can get a stake based since a huge possibilities that we can earn more from it.

BCTS

full member

Activity: 784

Merit: 100

The betting system is more interesting for bounty hunters, but so far there is no special profit from bounty companies in whatever form they pass.

publicjud

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1003

twet.ch/inv/62d7ae96

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

In my opinion both of them could be good and bad. It depends on many factors and, for example, if some campaign has a lot of participants fixed token reward will not be so bad option. I think that both types are fair enough.

Nesbee2

jr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 3

Using fix token method in my opinion is usually a way of cheating on bounty hunters, stake base is good and somehow transparent , and with stake base if the number of participants are not much then the few who did the tasks earn a good number of tokens each. i will always prefer stake base allocation for bounty tasks.

apitico

full member

Activity: 571

Merit: 100

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on February 16, 2019, 03:33:12 PM

Quote from: bigcash2011 on February 12, 2019, 03:40:07 PM

You are absolutely right i have also noted this, fixed reward per task or campaign is usually very low so that is generally not worth it while in stakes system we can receive decent rewards especially when we have low number of participants in a campaign.

Yes, completely agree with your opinion on this topic. Campaign with fixed allocation has not fulfilled the hunter's needs of tokens. And in stakes based system we will get a good amount of reward while the participants are less.

I also agree with you, but the main thing that in the end it all did not have a new type of fraud. The idea is interesting and I think that soon I will also join you.

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: bigcash2011 on February 12, 2019, 03:40:07 PM

You are absolutely right i have also noted this, fixed reward per task or campaign is usually very low so that is generally not worth it while in stakes system we can receive decent rewards especially when we have low number of participants in a campaign.

Yes, completely agree with your opinion on this topic. Campaign with fixed allocation has not fulfilled the hunter's needs of tokens. And in stakes based system we will get a good amount of reward while the participants are less.

vanya.pronin.1983

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 10

Stakes based bounties are much better, because in my opinion you will get a much better rewards, because it is pretty usual that fixed rewards are pretty silly and worth almost nothing. In such campaigns a facebook bounty participant gets better rewards as a signature member.

jessyj48

member

Activity: 756

Merit: 14

I don't like fixed tokens allocation for once ,its always feel like not enough for your hardworking ,I prefer stakes because your reward depends entirely on how many participants joined the bounty apart from how many campaigns you joined

universal3ee

jr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 2

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

Previously there was a thread regarding stakes or fixed token allocation and i think maybe more people prefer to get fixed instead of stakes and ICO change their way of distribution. I will prefer fixed although i know that your concern is we are not able to get more tokens even when there is lesser hunters but if there is more hunters our profit is lesser.

biznes35

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 253

The system is very good because bounty hunters will be sure that they will receive their reward and they will not have to conduct discussions for their tokens.

rudolfaxl

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1001

I don't mind to have fixed reward rate, but in BTC)) Current rewards worth almost nothing once they're getting listed to an exchange, so it doesn't matter if campaign has fixed reward rate or old kind stakes reward system. Unfortunately until the bulls come bounty campaigns won't bring any good reward...

StarofBTC

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 528

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?

Then I guess we need to imagine like we are participating in a campaign where more people are also competing with us. This way you never need to worry on fixed token allocation on weekly basis.

I guess every managers are having some unique idea to save better for their clients and this sounds like a latest innovations for not paying small group of bounty participants too the same allocated tokens. Seems a good idea as this may help heavy dumps from few investors.

sssergy

full member

Activity: 366

Merit: 100

Several conditions for different ICOs like wemark token didn't reached hardcap so bounty reward is low but bidooh ready to release their 2nd bounty.

Nekoma2018

copper member

Activity: 493

Merit: 13

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

I think the token allocation system for bounty campaigns isn't a bad idea... it's help limit the amount of tokens given to hunters... and same way.. if the token allocated to a daily task is worth a good amount of dollar... then I'm good with the project

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: forexandcryptoauditor on February 12, 2019, 03:01:09 PM

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

It's not that bad in comparison with the stakes policy, when bounty hunter can't get more than some max limit. I understand devs want to prevent token centralization, but it's not fair enough in my view.

jt byte

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 500

Fixed allocation is better in my opinion, you should have a reward for finding the ICO and the bounty earlier than someone else and your advantage is much worse with stakes based bounties.

Kimi80

sr. member

Activity: 750

Merit: 252

I don`t know what is better, to know what would be reward for your work or not and get surprised, pleasant or unpleasant. Personally, I love to know what would be amount that I deserved for my participation in some work or project than to think about it constantly what will be the result, how much I will receive. That way I could manage the potential profit. On the other hand, it`s always better to get more than less xexe, but the uncertainty really goes on my nerve Cheesy

zikabra

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 139

I don't like that kind of rewarding system because it looks like bounty participants will receive less tokens than in system with shared pool.
I have seen one bounty with ridiculous low rewards and i don't know what is the reason for low rewards it's not like they have to pay money to bounty participants.

baghdatis1990

member

Activity: 504

Merit: 14

Miracle Tele

When choosing a project that offers fixed stakes every week, choose the safe option. In a market where there are many SCAM projects, it is preferable during this period to choose the projects that offer such a payment distribution method. Thus, we will be sure that our work will be rewarded. Even if small amounts are offered, at least we have the guarantee that we will get something.

Topic: Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based (Read 19608 times)