I prefer stakes of course.
Pros: When there are less participants , participant will get large sum of tokens.
Cons: Usual end result will not be good for the team. Cause some people will have enough tokens to hit the market (temporary though)
But if there are too many participants, then Fixed Reward is better. No matter how many people are joining, you will get your reward.
So if you want to get higher profit, try to join into a campaign with lower number of participants and pay by stakes. But never join into campaign which is not acceptable by mass people.
Topic: Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based - page 3. (Read 19638 times)
February 13, 2019, 09:08:46 AM
February 13, 2019, 09:05:00 AM
Everything depends on the value of the coin after it get listed or when you get bounty coins, because what ever volume of coin/token you receive if it did not get decent price when we receive the bounty reward then it is worthless. Long back it was fixed bounty reward but the listing price of coin was good so the reward is also good. Today we care receiving in stakes but when we receive the bounty till then the price is very low that the value of the bounty is useless.
February 13, 2019, 08:57:43 AM
Betting is best, because if there are not enough participants and the bounty pool is not cut, then the payout will not be small!
February 13, 2019, 08:53:25 AM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
All the bounty campaign that I have participated in are stakes based I hate fixed token allocation one of my friends participate on token allocation campaign and only got $50 worth of token from their ICO price in 4 months campaign I rather get my signature blank than participate on that kind of rewards.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
February 13, 2019, 08:37:40 AM
At this moment bounty hunters is increasing day by day. For that bounty hunters will not get high rewards if allocation is stake based. If allocation will fixed then people will get a exact amount for each week. Here the amount of hunters don't affect the bounty rewards. So I want to say fixed and stake based those methods are good if the main bounty pull is huge. Thanks
February 13, 2019, 08:32:57 AM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
I think we dont need to take part in that campaign, we don't need a project that doesn't even respect people who help them pay hunters with small feeit cant be forgiven. but maybe if we can negotiate with the bounty manager to turn it into stake based. Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
February 13, 2019, 08:15:32 AM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
It will default your token every week and you don't care how many people are participating in that campaign. But I like bounty campaigns that are measured by stake per week, we will have a better chance of getting more tokens if there are fewer participants Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
February 13, 2019, 08:06:35 AM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
stake based allocation is better than fixed. It is maximize your reward since the stake can provide you a good amount of tokens compared to fixed stake based whch you already know the amount of tokens you will receive. Plus there is thrill in stake based since you can be surprised with your rewards later on.
Still bounty hunters freedom to choose between as there's a lots of available project around, choose whatever you think that will benefits you after.
February 13, 2019, 08:04:07 AM
I think the best solution would be a system of stakes with a limited number of participants in bounty programs. This will allow bounty hunters to receive higher paying rewards. Sometimes the program lasts about a year and during this time several thousand participants join it. As a result, the reward is only a few dollars.
February 13, 2019, 04:01:26 AM
I also began to observe such rewards more often, but I still prefer to participate in the bounty where the calculation goes in rates!
February 13, 2019, 03:54:18 AM
yes it is usually calculated from the total post or weekly. it is indeed less interesting because the number of prizes has been determined and is very influential on the participants. but that was their decision
February 13, 2019, 03:19:56 AM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
stake based allocation is better than fixed. It is maximize your reward since the stake can provide you a good amount of tokens compared to fixed stake based whch you already know the amount of tokens you will receive. Plus there is thrill in stake based since you can be surprised with your rewards later on.
February 13, 2019, 03:14:48 AM
Not all bounty programs provide prizes based on fixed token allocation. In fact, I see now that the bounty program gives prizes based on the stake gained. But yes, I do not agree with the bounty program that gives prizes based on fixed token allocations, because that will create injustice for bounty hunters who work harder.
February 13, 2019, 02:46:40 AM
Some times allocation don't given exactly if hardcap or softcap not reach and they giving it less that you expect for, so allocation not follow sometimes with rules.
February 13, 2019, 02:39:48 AM
Both methods have plus and minus in my opinion. It depends on some conditions to determine them, for example, how long the campaign will last, the total allocation of the bounty, the number of participants.
February 13, 2019, 02:07:23 AM
I think better to be fair once the allocation of the token they need to have quota like the signature campaign once they filled all the rank they will be close and once they leave or removed they will open. Because sometimes why the bounty hunters get less token even the allocation is very high or a lot of amount of token because the participants is more than hundreds parrixioants sometimes like 500 and they will divided according how long and the stake total.
February 13, 2019, 01:51:52 AM
I believe in the stake based system But this Project managers always have all the rules even if they were new participants before they would calculate and people would get normal stake But now Most bounty managers Do whatever they want and even deny payment in general if there are low participants in the project which should not be so
February 13, 2019, 01:04:44 AM
Well depending the bounty host I can determine that. But I mostly prefer stake base because in some bounties like in Bounty0x fixed token allocation is a pain that you wouldn't love to have.
in fact there are more bounty campaigns that provide stake-based than directly in the number of tokens or rewards that exist. some also provide weekly rewards and various forms of payment, some use usdt, some use btc or other coin assets. February 13, 2019, 12:54:41 AM
Both have advantages and disadvantages. Stake-based reward will give you bigger reward but it can also give you lesser reward if the number of participant is huge while with fixed tokens, you can get the exact rewards regardless of participant's number. Based on my experience, the amount of reward i got from stake-based system is bigger than the fixed one.
February 12, 2019, 11:55:07 PM
Neither stake base or fixed token weekly payment base are the same part of market strategy of the project. Sometimes stake base is more recommendable than token weekly base because stake is much better counting when the participants are few. However stake base is unrecommendable with regards to hundreds or thousands of participants much better the weekly token payment. Both have advantage and disadvantage. It is our choice what we participated
Jump to: