Topic: Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based - page 4. (Read 19644 times)

Depending on the allocation of each campaign, sometimes some projects that use a system based on tokens if the allocation for social media campaigns is greater than the signature, I will choose this system because we can get more or equal to those who follow the signatures.

Well depending the bounty host I can determine that. But I mostly prefer stake base because in some bounties like in Bounty0x fixed token allocation is a pain that you wouldn't love to have.

If me i will just make it simple, if i see it is not good or not agree with rules, i am not join it. Anything we do wouldn't make bounty manager change their rules and there are still a lot of bounties to pick if we not agree with 1 bounty.

I do not think that with a fixed distribution of tokens per week to bounty hunters, they therefore receive fewer tokens. Here, many people write that bounty hunters use multiple accounts, and therefore you need to use the KYC check to filter them. This payment system makes it so that regardless of the number of accounts with other people, everyone will receive a guaranteed number of tokens per week. In fact, also with this form of payment, bounty hunters do not receive generally less tokens than they would receive if they were paid by rates. Firstly, payment by tokens is also calculated by the ICO team to pay a few percent of tokens from the total pool, as well as when paying by bids. Secondly, if a smaller number of participants joins the ICO bounty campaign, as a rule, the ICO team vseravno reduces the payment of tokens by reducing the total number of tokens to be paid in this case. To this end, the ICO team provides almost everywhere the possibility of reducing the number of tokens paid out in case there are very few campaign participants who have joined. Therefore, I still prefer to pay a fixed number of tokens per week, so we definitely will always be confident in the payment of a certain number of tokens. Of course, if the team at the same time collects the required amount.

Fixed reward per week isn't worth it I would prefer fixed amount of tokens for the bounty exercise not just for the weekly activities. Bounties are gone the old good days when peojects are generous to give a huge sum as 3m USD 2m but now projects hardly pay upto 500k.

if I have to choose I will prefer stake base allocation. because it depend on how many token sold, we can get more token if the token sell reach the hardcap )

But at the same time, in this system, if the particular project has many participants it won't affect your reward. So it's good thing too.

They are doing this because with this, they don't have to give much tokens and if there are less participants then the tokens they have to give to the bounty hunters is pretty low. So its kind of a new way of not giving much tokens to bounty hunters.

Yes, the bounty hunter received the token very little and not as promised. Some projects that I met like that and this is like we were cheated. But this project is still running and can even be included in the exchange market. Finding a project that truly benefits the bounty hunter, for now, is indeed difficult.

Whether if it's stake based or fixed allocation it depends on the bounty hunter if he/she wants to participate on that bounty campaign. Well most bounties now are scam and others are failed due to lack of investors so usually no payment for bounty hunters.

I'm much agree on stake-base bounty program because we can enjoy our most token rewards on what we have worked for especially when there are limited participants allowed and this could give good profit when it's out in the market.

Fixed allocation also brings many benefits to bounty hunter if the campaign has too many participants.

My opinion there are good and bad things, there is a bounty manager that limits the participants of each campaign but there are also those that are not restrictive. If participants are limited, I think it is indeed more profitable for stakes based systems. But if participants are not restricted, fixed tokens allocation based is the best

I think it is better if the rewards per week would be base on stakes. Because if its in tokens, it is fixed and no one knows its price on the exchange and in the long run it could just give a very low value on the exchange.

This is a technique to reducing the bounty pool i think my thinking is absolutely right. Because suppose which campaign budget is 2 million worth token but some few people’s enrolls that's means weekly basis token count is bullshit for hunters. But after finish ico and when listing in exchange you guys never will be get nothing. Stakes based token allocation fine.                 

of course they cut the allocation because some reasons such as hardcap were not achieved because they did't want coins for bounties to be bigger or equivalent to the coins that investors get

I doesn't mean that those bounty campaign which are not run on stakes bases but with fixed allocated tokens are not always bad or cheat bounty hunters by any chance and what bounty hunters have to do in such occasion is knowing the worth of the allocated token in USD and do research about the project which will guarantee if the rewards will worth joining the campaign.

The problem : they cut the amount of allocation and give lower than what they promise. It is the problem in stake based reward that I ever found currently. I saw some bounties did it suddenly after the program ended. It is absolutely unfair. So, for me, it is a better stride if there are many new bounties running their program with fixed amount of tokens nowadays.   

Some projects team or managers intentionally do this,knowing fully week that there will still be more than enough tokens left. To campaigns of this nature, they usually allocate huge amount to attract bounty hunters,but at the end, the amount the bounty participant will get will be fixed.
Sometimes,i t could've advantage to lower rank members, such as Jr. Member, because when using stakes based reward, the higher rank members, usually get most part of the allocation.

but most of platforms are using fixed tokens allocation this time. There was a lot of change in the bounty allocation and anytime it will remain the same. In this time some platforms were offering big allocation for bounty to create noise in the community