Topic: Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based - page 5. (Read 19644 times)
February 12, 2019, 06:22:49 PM
I've also experience this that the promise token and for the exchange was different it is triple lower that the promise exchange so we don't know what are their bases on the stakes calculation that converted on tokens. In your opinion instead of token that display on the spreadsheets why they choose stakes and converted at the end.
February 12, 2019, 05:55:35 PM
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Fixed salary gives you an opportunity to know how much you will receive
So you decide to participate or not
But there is a negative side of low salaries and loss of big opportunities if the number of participants is lower
February 12, 2019, 05:39:18 PM
I always wanted to participate in the project with stake-based distribution, and I think this is one of the great calculations. But for projects with a large number of participants sometimes I hope that the token can pay me.
February 12, 2019, 05:36:05 PM
Having fixed reward is much better than to have stakes allocation. But what's important with this rewarding system, are they really going to pay? Bounty hunters doesn't really care anymore with the amount of stake or fixed token they are about to receive after the ICO but they even care more about the distribution process.
Firstly, you should understand that both have their advantages and disadvantages. Once you consider this, you can then chose if you should pick one over the other. Stake based bounties could be highly profitable if lesser participants enrol for the said bounty but could be highly disastrous if there are too many hunters involved. In this case, fixed token bounties could be the key because, irrespective of the number of hunters, the tokens are fixed.
Fixed amount is better than unfixed. At first this helps you decide on participation. In others, a new revolution began to reduce the bounty reward. I know that the fixed amount is often small, but better than unknown and changeable reward.
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Either stake based or fixed tokens format, it doesn’t mean low income or high income
What wins more stakes or tokens weekly is the level of participation
Social media always earn little, atleast 80% of projects
Tey content and observe the increase in stakes for you
I think the fixed amount system is good because you know how much you are getting and they are more likely to pay out. Often if there aren't enough participants they will change the amount anyway or refuse payment
But if duration of the bounty is only brief, then we will only get a few tokens, but if duration of the bounty is very long, sometimes I think it's more profitable, but here I prefer calculation every week using stake. 
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Honestly applying other methods never worked in bounty industry and giving fixed reward doesn't look like good idea. Stake based distribution will be more fair and affordable than solving problems which created by crying bounty hunters who look for justice. Bounty programs are not profitable as in old years,so theme dies slowly. Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
I think it is better to go on to stake based, because stakes base is pair on the bounty company, because we don't know how much token sold in the token sale so i think ifbit is stakes based the token will formally divided by its respected allocation. While in token base we don't know if it will be formally decided by allocation due to the unpredictable market condition.
I think the fixed amount system is good because you know how much you are getting and they are more likely to pay out. Often if there aren't enough participants they will change the amount anyway or refuse payment
You are absolutely right i have also noted this, fixed reward per task or campaign is usually very low so that is generally not worth it while in stakes system we can receive decent rewards especially when we have low number of participants in a campaign.
Hallo everyone,
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.
Jump to: