Since there's no new update yet regarding the fight, let's discuss what Bob Arum said about his fighter Inoue, who he believes is probably better than Pacquiao.
What does he mean by that? Does he mean they have achieved more so far at the same age or division, or does he believe that Inoue would be able to surpass the success of Pacman? Many experts believe that there's a very slim chance that someone in the current generation would surpass what Pacman has achieved. So, if Inoue is special, he might be able to prove the experts wrong.
One advantage Inoue has over Pacman at the current age is that Inoue is still undefeated. However, if we compare the quality of opponents they have faced, I think Pacquiao has fought more challenging opponents than Inoue.
Perhaps what he meant that in terms of skills and most likely the power, Inoue could be better than Pacquiao. The thing with Manny though is that he really push himself to be great, meaning he is just a one dimensional fighter, but when he was trained by Roach, he uses his right hand effectively.
But in terms of popularity, no doubt that Manny can fill in live gates whoever he faces, have records in the top 10 as far as PPV numbers is, number 1 to be exact when he fought Floyd and I doubt that anyone can break that numbers in the next 50 years.
Although these are very valid opinions, I would not dare to compare boxers from other times to these, firstly, due to different circumstances, I am not one of the people who can make a purchase from a legend like Pacquia to the boxers of today, now the boxers have other types of food, other types of treatment are other times, obviously at that time when Pacquiao was at that age he was a total monster, I can't compare abilities, that's what fights are for, to see who is the strongest, maybe if Inoue may turn out to be bigger than Pacquiao, but it's a glitch that I wouldn't dare to say, because it would be disrespectful, there are many factors that exist.
However, I like to praise good boxers, those who really care about the sport and not so much about making money, what I like about Pcquao and who is like Inoue is that they both don't say no to the challenges or revenge, I would not dare to buy an Inoue with a Mayewather because I see an Inoue much more professional than a Mayweather, and that for now with the two of them they can fight, in fact any of Pacquiao or they can fight with Inoue, the only thing is that their experience does not compare with the natural hildiad or talteno that the Japanese have, so it would be interesting to see them measure themselves, but not talking, but fighting.
There is also this:
Oleksandr Usyk Names The Best Fighter On The PlanetWhilst Inoue is poised to face Tapales, Crawford has announced his desire to face undisputed super-welterweight champion, Jermell Charlo.
However, Charlo’s upcoming bout with Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez at super-middleweight means he will be stripped of at least on of those belts, and may not even return to that division depending on the result.
Source:
https://boxing-social.com/news/oleksandr-usyk-names-best-fighter/After all, they are opinions, this is not something I can tell, it is an opinion, what matters are the fights themselves, everything becomes a mere speculation, which is also valid.