[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 22.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: ibminer on October 29, 2020, 01:39:36 PM

Those were created to distinguish the main badges

Oh, OK, good to know. Additionally, when you have some time, don't forget also my previous post, where I reported a few typos. They are still present after the latest update. I'm mentioning it as I didn't get any reply from you or suchmoon and I don't know if you missed it or if you considered it too minor.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: ibminer on October 29, 2020, 01:39:36 PM

Those were created to distinguish the main badges, this was changed on this update.
The circuitry was removed and a laurel wreath was put in for any badges that are not part of the main rankings (only 2 at the moment, most posts and most earned merit).

Surely it would be better to distinguish between the three "main" rankings that are used to calculate the "most recognised" score and the two that don't. See also LINK

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on October 29, 2020, 01:47:56 AM

I don't know if this is the design, but I just noticed that the image pattern for 1st place for Most Earned Merit is different than the pattern used for the 1st place of the other sections. The Most Earned Merit image pattern looks mostly plain green, while in the case of the other sections looks like a segment of a green mother board.

In case the design of this image should be changed for matching the design of the other sections, I hope this post will help noticing the issue.

Those were created to distinguish the main badges, this was changed on this update.
The circuitry was removed and a laurel wreath was put in for any badges that are not part of the main rankings (only 2 at the moment, most posts and most earned merit).

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

I don't know if this is the design, but I just noticed that the image pattern for 1st place for Most Earned Merit is different than the pattern used for the 1st place of the other sections. The Most Earned Merit image pattern looks mostly plain green, while in the case of the other sections looks like a segment of a green mother board.

In case the design of this image should be changed for matching the design of the other sections, I hope this post will help noticing the issue.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: LoyceV on October 26, 2020, 10:20:01 AM

I was under the impression that BPIP already keeps track of inactive users the moment they make a new post.
If it helps, I can list all userIDs within seconds after they make a post. I already make a daily list of all users who post, I just don't publish it.

Thanks, but we have the recent posts, it's just a matter of integrating it properly with everything. For example new posts, modlog, seclog, trust changes, merits should all trigger refresh of affected user profiles so that the data is up to date. We're getting there but slowly.

I see that profile has already been refreshed and is no longer shown as inactive.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: suchmoon on October 26, 2020, 09:07:10 AM

I have an enhancement planned that if a new post is detected it would update sooner but it's going to take a while to implement.

I was under the impression that BPIP already keeps track of inactive users the moment they make a new post.
If it helps, I can list all userIDs within seconds after they make a post. I already make a daily list of all users who post, I just don't publish it.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 26, 2020, 08:58:23 AM

Today I noticed one member eth888 is showing as Inactive on BPIP extension and on BPIP website, but he made five posts today. Prior to that he was inactive for few months.
Is this some bug or it just takes time for information to be updated?
How long until status is updated usually?

The longer an account is inactive the less often it's updated. This particular one will be updated in ~9 days unless someone clicks the refresh button:

Loading...

Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

I have an enhancement planned that if a new post is detected it would update sooner but it's going to take a while to implement.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Today I noticed one member eth888 is showing as Inactive on BPIP extension and on BPIP website, but he made five posts today. Prior to that he was inactive for few months.
Is this some bug or it just takes time for information to be updated?
How long until status is updated usually?

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Thanks for the suggestion Vod, it would certainly help when posting batches of information.

I found this a while ago, it helps explain the metric date presentation:

Quote from: 2586 on May 31, 2013, 09:55:45 AM

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

From another thread:

Quote

2019-04-30 Various trust feedbacks given to each-other
5/1/2019 4:42:20 AM password reset via email
5/1/2019 4:42:44 AM woke up

I never did standardize my dates. I hope you choose the metric format.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 23, 2020, 09:14:21 AM

@suchmoon I just love finding bugs and flaws.
As I said before, BPIP extension was still showing my DT1 status all the time, so it looks like BPIP website and extension are not in sync Wink

The website was also showing the "DT1" label next to your name and on your profile etc. The bug is limited just to the DT change log, which says "no longer selected". Processing of that log is already quite slow so I'm reluctant to make any changes to try to fix this as it's such a rare issue.

Thanks for testing though, much appreciated Grin

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

@suchmoon I just love finding bugs and flaws.
As I said before, BPIP extension was still showing my DT1 status all the time, so it looks like BPIP website and extension are not in sync Wink

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: LoyceV on October 23, 2020, 03:41:55 AM

I can't find anything on the forum that would suggest wiping my Trust list changed anything in my DT1-status, so I'm curious where BPIP gets it this information.

It does not change your actual DT1 status, not until the end of the month anyway. But your name disappears from ;full;dt so BPIP assumes you're gone (since you must have at least 10 inclusions to be in DT1). It's a bug but really people... stop screwing around with your trust lists Grin

.

I'll file this under "will not fix; will manually delete these records; and will look sternly at people doing this".

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Where does BPIP's DT Change Log get the idea that "LoyceV DT1 is no longer selected into DT1" from when I wipe my Trust list? I tested this after dkbit98 had cleaned his Trust list and suchmoon manually removed the entry.

I can't find anything on the forum that would suggest wiping my Trust list changed anything in my DT1-status, so I'm curious where BPIP gets it this information.

loyce.club/Is...StillOnDT/LoyceV.html has it's flaws, but didn't pick up any changes.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: LoyceV on October 07, 2020, 10:16:53 AM

Clicking "REFRESH PROFILE" twice fixed it. Weird.

If there was one or more pages ahead of you in the queue, it may not update the data in the small delay you are given. A page refresh would do the same thing. It's like pressing the walk button a second time (or mashing it repeatedly) to cross the street.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Timelord2067 on October 07, 2020, 07:23:37 AM

Why would kakamrul's page show red when they have no negative?

Clicking "REFRESH PROFILE" twice fixed it. Weird.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Why would kakamrul's page show red when they have no negative?

https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2763778 ( Archive [1a], [1b] )

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on October 04, 2020, 12:18:46 AM

Quote from: ibminer on October 03, 2020, 11:31:11 PM

These should be corrected now.

Same to me.

Hmm.. well, it works locally in VS when debugging.

Not sure what's going on there, the path in the code looks correct to me now ("../Profile?p"), it had been just "Profile?p" .. I'll have to look closer tomorrow on why the published/compiled copy didn't reflect this.

edit/update:
OK should be fixed this time. Grin

I didn't fully figure out the relative path issue, but I just made it an absolute URL.

edit #2:
So after looking at the initial link you posted, the issue was we were looking at different pages. "mostmerited.aspx" was renamed to mostemerit.aspx, but the old 'mostmerited.aspx' file was still lingering. I've deleted the old file and setup a redirect to redirect it to the correct page. I'd do another 'DOH' meme but I'll refrain. Tongue

BlackHatCoiner

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 7340

Farewell, Leo

Quote from: Vod on October 03, 2020, 12:10:47 PM

Wouldn't that break most reports?

Can you report bitcointalk members through bpip?

Anyway here's the mistake:

You're linking us to a "Profile" directory/page when we already are on a folder named "r". Thus, you're redirecting us to /r/Profile

One simple solution is to add a "/" before "Profile":

Quote from: ibminer on October 03, 2020, 11:31:11 PM

These should be corrected now.

Same to me.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Hi guys, just a quick heads-up.

You have a user profile: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=crypto_trader#43xzEXrP which is labeled as "crypto_trader" and the visit profile links to https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptotrader-151153

Code:

Name: crypto_trader
Posts: 1
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Position: Newbie
Status: INACTIVE
Date Registered: 19 September 2013, 15:39:46
Last Active: 26 September 2013, 10:39:33

However, there is a user crypto_trader#43xzEXrP https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptotrader43xzexrp-1105573 / https://bpip.org/Profile?id=1105573

Code:

Name: crypto_trader#43xzEXrP
Posts: 1010
Activity: 784
Merit: 184
Position: Full Member
Date Registered: 13 August 2017, 05:44:50
Last Active: 03 October 2020, 22:48:42

See also this post on the LoyceV thread concerning the overlap of user information.

Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 22. (Read 21771 times)