[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 20.

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 1047

Quote from: logfiles on September 30, 2020, 02:57:27 AM

Quote from: andulolika on September 30, 2020, 02:37:36 AM

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.

I didn't imagine either it would work like this, but i'm okay with it. This is how it looks here

.
I'd merit you but I'm not merit farmer so i has no merits.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1638

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: andulolika on September 30, 2020, 02:37:36 AM

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 1047

Quote from: logfiles on September 30, 2020, 01:26:05 AM

Quote from: andulolika on September 30, 2020, 01:01:49 AM

Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.

It's because it is. Look again carefully

A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1638

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: andulolika on September 30, 2020, 01:01:49 AM

Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.

It's because it is. Look again carefully

A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 1047

Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on September 29, 2020, 06:34:06 AM

No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.

This might be a bit complicated. I'll run some tests when I have time. If it can be calculated on the fly without hogging up a lot of CPU we can probably implement it, but if it needs an aggregation then it would be a lower priority.

Quote from: LoyceV on September 29, 2020, 01:12:43 PM

Quote from: ibminer on September 29, 2020, 06:02:24 AM

I added the 120-day in yesterday

This is slightly inaccurate: if I add up the numbers on the forum, I get 614 earned Merit and 3599 sent Merit. On BPIP it shows 616 and 3631 respectively. Theymos takes 120 days up to the second accurate, it would be cool if BPIP can do the same.

Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.

-CryptoViking-

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 335

https://t.me/CRYPTOVlKING

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on September 29, 2020, 06:34:06 AM

~snip~

I second this, it would be awesome if something like this could be implemented.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ibminer on September 29, 2020, 06:02:24 AM

I added the 120-day in yesterday

This is slightly inaccurate: if I add up the numbers on the forum, I get 614 earned Merit and 3599 sent Merit. On BPIP it shows 616 and 3631 respectively. Theymos takes 120 days up to the second accurate, it would be cool if BPIP can do the same.
Disclaimer: I took those values several hours ago but had to go before I could post them.

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Quote from: ibminer on September 29, 2020, 06:02:24 AM

Are you referring to something like this report?

No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.

Look at the image below.

BPIP (edited)

A: My rank if number of earned merits in the last 30 days is considered.
B: My rank if number of earned merits in the last 90 days is considered.
...
...

If I click on "A", I would see list of top-merited users in the last 30 days.
If I click on "B", I would see list of top-merited users in the last 90 days.
...
...

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Are you planning to add another icon in the category: the most generous sender of merit, which will be based on this table https://bpip.org/Report?r=meritsent ?

No I haven't really planned that. I'd have to give that one some thought and hear what others think.

Wouldn't this be redundant as a top 1000 list? Outside of merit sources, which I assume would occupy the top X positions, the ones with most earned merit should end up the most generous senders.. unless everyone is hoarding them? *shrug*

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Ah, thank you. I added the 120-day in yesterday but didn't have time to fully respond. I was just doing 60 day increments, didn't realize there was a general requirement out there for campaigns.

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on September 28, 2020, 03:08:14 PM

Can you also add list of most merited users based on merits earned in the last X days?

Are you referring to something like this report?

It could probably use a "report options" button/menu with some additional capabilities.

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Thanks for the update.

Quote from: ibminer on September 28, 2020, 02:46:25 PM

-Added 30/90/150 day counts for earned & sent merit.

Since signature campaign managers usually ask applicants number of merits earned in the last 120 days, it would be useful to add 120 days as well.

Can you also add list of most merited users based on merits earned in the last X days?

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

UPDATE
-Moved report.aspx to the newer infrastructure… which is now the /Report page. (Redirects will be set, but saved links should be updated for the new URL!).
-Adjusted link for ‘Most Merit’ on Profile page.
-Set tooltip’s to close when another tooltip is triggered.
-Re-organized the way profile page displays flags, added percentages.
-Added a RED color which will appear for any active flags on the profile page.
-Added information text, for clarity, to smerit.aspx.
-Added 30/90/120/150 day counts for earned & sent merit.
-Revised wording on profile page from 'has given' and 'has received' to 'has sent' and 'has earned' (under merit info).
-Small adjustment to BTCTalk Throwback theme (link color).
-Fixed 0’s on Profile page and corrected Ordinal numbers for all displayed ranks.

BPIP Cards
Ground has been made on releasing BPIP cards but there is concern over the system resources needed to deliver the completed image to the browser. It works, but testing it has hurt the system resources a bit too much. These are larger images intended for printing, so they take up a good amount of memory when generating. We are seeking some alternatives (or a separate server) to handle the load better.

edit: added 120 day merit counts.

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

The link was corrected back in July... I thought before this prior release was published, but apparently not. Undecided

.. According to the commit history and FTP timestamps, it looks like it was corrected 2-3 days after the last release in July... so it will be corrected the next time we move changes over to live.

As for the 0's... was a little confused at first on this one. The code for >1000 is still there, however an 'ordinal' function is being applied to it after it changes it to >1000.. Ordinal() function seems to be then converting it back to 0. Doesn't seem like the ordinal function is working at all though, so this seems to be where the issue stems from. Those ranks should be adding the 'th' 'rd', etc. Should be able to get this corrected on the next release.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: suchmoon on September 22, 2020, 10:38:23 AM

2) I need to look into the issue with zeroes - can't answer that right now.

I can code in there from before that was similar to:

IF score<=0 then display ">1000".

That would be the first place to look I think.

-CryptoViking-

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 335

https://t.me/CRYPTOVlKING

Quote from: suchmoon on September 22, 2020, 10:38:23 AM

A couple of different issues here:

1) The link in the "Merit" column is wrong. It should be https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerit (without the "ed").
2) I need to look into the issue with zeroes - can't answer that right now.

Ah , I tried various things as @Timelord2067 suggested, but it did not help.

Good to know why there is a problem, I didn't remember to look at the links while waiting for the page to load. If I did I could've seen that after it fails to load shows this https://bpip.org/?noreportname - Noreportname, meaning it can't find the username most likely.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: -CryptoViking- on September 21, 2020, 11:10:37 PM

Hey just wanted to report that the page is not showing the rank, for the number of earned merits, activity, Feedback Trust and Recognition. I see that is was last parsed 6 mins ago, so I presume this is some kind of an error.It does not take me to the full list when I click on 0, but it takes me to the homepage instead.

A couple of different issues here:

1) The link in the "Merit" column is wrong. It should be https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerit (without the "ed").
2) I need to look into the issue with zeroes - can't answer that right now.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 2218

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: -CryptoViking- on September 22, 2020, 01:23:41 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 22, 2020, 01:13:43 AM

Might have to clear your cache, or refresh your browser. I can see you have one score less than the upper limit of 1,000:

Thanks for the input, I will give it a go and see it that helps.

If you're still having issues, a work around is to replace the URL with this one: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=-CryptoViking-

Note: it's not just replacing the UID with your profile name, rather it's a totally different URL.

Other URL: https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2293893 which takes you to the same information.

-CryptoViking-

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 335

https://t.me/CRYPTOVlKING

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 22, 2020, 01:13:43 AM

Might have to clear your cache, or refresh your browser. I can see you have one score less than the upper limit of 1,000:

Thanks for the input, I will give it a go and see it that helps.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 2218

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: -CryptoViking- on September 21, 2020, 11:10:37 PM

Hey just wanted to report that the page is not showing the rank, for the number of earned merits, activity, Feedback Trust and Recognition. I see that is was last parsed 6 mins ago, so I presume this is some kind of an error.It does not take me to the full list when I click on 0, but it takes me to the homepage instead.

If it's nothing major and because of some glitch, just ignore

Might have to clear your cache, or refresh your browser. I can see you have one score less than the upper limit of 1,000:

Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 20. (Read 19683 times)