Pages:
Author

Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 23. (Read 21771 times)

legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
And.. ^^ it looks like I've got an issue on the mobile view edit: with safari/iOS devices
I would like to report a bug.

These should be corrected now.

.. also added some additional favicon/icon images for better device compatibility. (using https://realfavicongenerator.net/)

Bug probably ~

Will have to take a closer look at this.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
So a solution would be to redirect any /r link to /

Wouldn't that break most reports?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Question is what does archived on a profile mean?
See BPIP, hover the ?:
Quote
Inactive profiles that have no posts and no trust OR profiles that have been banned or nuked by the staff.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
While using the extension, have seen a couple of profiles marked as archived though I can't recall the names at the moment.
Question is what does archived on a profile mean? I always knew that if the account is inactive, we would see Inactive and If it was banned we see Banned on the profile.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
I would like to report a bug. On most merited posts in the last x hours the links to the profiles lead to a wrong url.

The right one is: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=BlackHatCoiner
Although, it redirects me to https://bpip.org/r/Profile?p=BlackHatCoiner which is wrong.

So a solution would be to redirect any /r link to /
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I'm (once again) making a request on linking to my Trust list viewer. It's always bugged me that users such as margon3 don't show a link to their last Trust list records.

I know BPIP uses https://loyce.club/trust/latestversion.txt to get https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h/user_ids.txt to update it's weekly links, but that doesn't work for users who had a custom Trust list before, but don't have one now.
It also leads to incorrect links on users such as Furfuraceous: the Trust list link gives a 404, because it should link to last week's Trust list.

By my math, BPIP should add or correct the Trust list link on 542 profiles.
I made a list of the last known version of each user's Trust list: https://loyce.club/trust/latesttrustlist.txt (currently 476KB).
This file gets updated right after latestversion.txt, and should be done after a minute delay.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Bug probably ~

Profile https://bpip.org/Profile?p=telcobert

Pay attention to the large number of "Profile woke up" records on the 1/1/2020.
But in the Seclog archive there is only one note that the telcobert account changed it's password and there is not a single record that this profile "woke up" on the 1/1/2020.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.
No objections here. Yes.. I apparently used date instead of datetime.  Embarrassed

This has been fixed. The 30/90/120/150 day merit counts should be accurate to the second and the links to the sent/received merit list reflect that as well.

@LoyceV
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.
This might be a bit complicated. I'll run some tests when I have time. If it can be calculated on the fly without hogging up a lot of CPU we can probably implement it, but if it needs an aggregation then it would be a lower priority.
It seems like this would just be adding a date/time range to the earned merit report?.. at least to get the list of users. If we need the ranking on the profile page, that might add a bit more to the query but the tests should help gauge this.

Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.
No objections here. Yes.. I apparently used date instead of datetime.  Embarrassed



Thanks, suchmoon.

...

And.. ^^ it looks like I've got an issue on the mobile view edit: with safari/iOS devices, in relation to the table header of the new flags & merit area dropping to the bottom due to, I think, an overflow css setting (you should be seeing the 'inactive' info in the screenshot as well). Will take a look at this as soon as I can.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓

Also, I am not sure what you see on BPIP https://bpip.org/Profile?id=223200 but It seems everything clear there, you have one flag against you which is active


Technically, if @andulolika were to lock the thread, the flag becomes invalid (not the least of which because the thread wasn't started by the one who first flew the flag)
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile
Easier solution: add ";dt" to the URL, like this to view any page as seen by DefaultTrust. See Trust flags for details:
Only users in your trust network count as supporting or opposing flags. For guests, the default trust network is used.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange

It's because of your trust list. You distrust all members which support flag against you, It is not a solution. it’s like you just close your eyes and don’t see the problem even if they still exist to all other people.
Here is how your trust list looks https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h/223200.html

Quote
andulolika Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~TECSHARE (Trust: +37 / =6 / -2) (936 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Vod (Trust: +26 / =1 / -2) (1671 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~Foxpup (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (Cool 1019 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~TMAN (Trust: +27 / =0 / -1) (1305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~Lauda (Trust: +35 / =3 / -2) (1643 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =6 / -0) (DT1 (-14) 490 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~yogg (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1610 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~hilariousandco (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1 (-4) 1082 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~joksim299 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. ~suchmoon (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (33) 4602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. ~owlcatz (Trust: +43 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (23) 376 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ~nutildah (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (2643 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. ~zazarb (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1 (-1) 498 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. ~LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (2737 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. ~bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. ~Last of the V8s (Trust: +7 / =0 / -1) (3665 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. ~AlexSimion (Trust: neutral) (109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. ~IconFirm (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (64 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. ~TheUltraElite (Trust: neutral) (466 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. ~blurryeyed (Trust: +2 / =5 / -1) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. ~nullius (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (DT1 (-6) 1751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. ~JollyGood (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 729 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. ~Parodium (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (226 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. ~GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (933 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. ~NotATether (Trust: neutral) (455 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Also, I am not sure what you see on BPIP https://bpip.org/Profile?id=223200 but It seems everything clear there, you have one flag against you which is active



legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1047
It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.
Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.



I didn't imagine either it would work like this, but i'm okay with it. This is how it looks here .
I'd merit you but I'm not merit farmer so i has no merits.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.
Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.


legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1047
Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.
It's because it is. Look again carefully



A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260
It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.
It's because it is. Look again carefully



A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1047
Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.

This might be a bit complicated. I'll run some tests when I have time. If it can be calculated on the fly without hogging up a lot of CPU we can probably implement it, but if it needs an aggregation then it would be a lower priority.

I added the 120-day in yesterday
This is slightly inaccurate: if I add up the numbers on the forum, I get 614 earned Merit and 3599 sent Merit. On BPIP it shows 616 and 3631 respectively. Theymos takes 120 days up to the second accurate, it would be cool if BPIP can do the same.

Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 335
https://t.me/CRYPTOVlKING
~snip~


I second this, it would be awesome if something like this could be implemented.
Pages:
Jump to: