Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 32. (Read 21801 times)

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

It's quite simple... the main page has a 'rank' table that lists a static 1-100 which is shared among the other tables. Originally, each table had its own 'rank' but this was requested by Vod at one point in the design process to get a cleaner look, which I actually liked. Unfortunately, it makes sharing ranks across multiple tables somewhat difficult/impossible with the way it is currently designed. So, as I said, it would need some reconstruction, which I'm not opposed to, but it is not at the top of the priority list at this point.

You posting a link to BPIP.org is completely different than a google doc, but keep trollin'!





Likely a resource issue that caused a time-out, should have resolved itself.



Ya, I really thought I would have more time... my presence at home seems to indicate I have to do *every* house project I'm behind on in the house, not to mention the majority of my job, which can be done remotely, plus appeasing kids who need attention 24x7. lol, this shit is crazy... nonetheless, I'm doing what I can do protect others, and myself.

Stay safe & healthy everyone!!

edit: I should also mention there was an issue with the flaglog.aspx which I corrected recently, seems my formula for parsing the prior 2 days worth of flags more frequently fails when it stalls for 2 days.. or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?... and then it returned 'null'. Hopefully this is corrected now.

That's because I fixed it just recently, and a few other missing profiles. Still not sure why exactly that's happening, will do some research later. Right now all profile IDs above 2000000 should be ok.

Checked, and he does show up https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2749610

Hi guys, want to ask

Why this user CryptoboyRamesh has not appeared in BPIP? I have do both search using his ID 2749610 and his username
But, I found no result. Any problem about this case? 

Have just crashed the site: https://bpip.org/error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/r/dt1changes.aspx

Looking at that banned profile > https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1163424
In the Trust Feedback Information he has 0 negative feedback but it is makred with red color.
On the other hand on the MATR information you have -2 in feedback. Last Parsed: 320 days, but the trust seems updated.
Strange, right?

For if it helps: as far as I know http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt is still complete. Every week, I replace the last 113 days with theymos' new 120 day data dump, so it includes any manual changes theymos did in the last 113 days.

It's amazing how not going out still eats up time

It's probably because in the past merits were being scraped differently and/or gaps in the data were filled in from other sources, which may have had no titles for deleted posts. Sometime in January (I think) I changed the scraper to use each user's merit history, which goes back 120 days so it's far less likely to have deleted gaps and it would display "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" when applicable as you noticed in gmaxwell's profile. Older data may need some manual intervention. I'll add it to my list of TODOs that keeps growing... no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

I have a follow-up question about the Most Trusted page namely how often does the page update?

Why I ask is because I believe my score for nearly a week should be 71 not 70 which would give me a rank of 228/229 tieing with mnightwaffle and asche

Then, with my score being 228/9 instead of 230(244)258 <--- about midway through those who have an equal score of "70" my Most Recognised score *should* be a few steps higher at 783 tieing at 34th place with Carlton Banks

---

However, *if* you are calculating the score as being one point per 36.5 days, then my score would be mid 68.5 to 69.5 at this point.  Either way my score isn't 70.

Thanks again.

Reposting this again, as I wasn't entirely sure whether this was an actual bug or not...

If you check the merit's history of some users (an example from my profile), you can see that in some cases, the "post" cell is blank.

At first, I thought it was because these posts were getting deleted or moved to the trashcan, but after checking other profiles(like this one for instance), I noticed that the "Off-limits/ignored/deleted"  is being displayed properly..so it must be something else?

I'm sorry to say I don't understand your answer - perhaps you could walk me through it...

Over on this page: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted <--- Assuming you have gotten over your fear of links that I post from third party sites) 

User mstrongbow has a score of 20 which gives his rank as 1,000.



Scrolling up six full pages, user TTBit also has a score of 20 yet his rank is 771.



How have the rankings been determined so that a full 229 users have the exact same scores yet their ranks are skewered so distortedly?  Neither has posted in over a year.

By giving mstrongbow a score of 1,000 his rank is far lower than TTBit *even though* they have the same score.

It then becomes a never ending circle - distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on this page, then that distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on another page.  That page's distorted score is then used on the first page to calculate a distorted score (and 'round it goes).

---

---

Both have just one shield:


Both have just one score (20) - it makes no sense to say one is 229 ranks better than the other one.

There's a same issue with some other profiles. All of them are not like the one already mentioned.
For example, this profile woke up twice. But both are on one day.

I could find an archived page of seclog.
All information inside the box below has been recorded twice.



Profiles on BPIP:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1087317
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1171969
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1120712
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=332403
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=512797
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=230052
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=218267
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1446383
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=715168
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2535561
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=988720

Interesting. Looks like a BPIP bug but I'm not sure how this could happen. Maybe some issue with the "Today" in the timestamps.

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?


Source: BPIP

This user woke up two times in 24 hours.

It's more DT1 exclusion than inclusion as well. I mean DT1 inclusion < DT1 exclusion.
When theymos compiled the DT1 for this month, all of these users had DT1 inclusion > DT1 exclusion but after the compilation some users who trusted/distrusted them has changed their minds and perhaps new DT1 came and excluded also which eventually made more DT1 exclusion then DT1 inclusion they had.

I think it makes sense :-P

My guess is they don't have any DT1-inclusions, so they're not on DT2 at all. Something similar to my previous suggestion not to show those, as they're "irrelevant" to DefaultTrust.

I'm having trouble taking a screen shot at the moment.  This is just a question about the dt1 page.  I've noticed a couple of users don't show up as DT1 or DT2, is this a thing, or is it a glitch?


Each one of these instances I've noticed it's the end of the line where (for whatever reason) there is not DT1/DT2 logo.

Nothing's broken as far as I can see but I'll take a deeper look. I have some doubts about the way we determine duplicates in modlog (unfortunately there are no timestamps) so maybe there is something going on there.

User Teltabit was Nuked last month:
This doesn't show up on https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Teltabit though. Is something broken?