[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 32.

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on May 07, 2020, 03:28:27 AM

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

Yes, as LoyceV mentioned, the 1st entry on each flag is seen as an entry, but isn't technically a change. I'll get that 'change' number adjusted on the flag page in the next update.

Quote from: LoyceV on May 07, 2020, 04:02:21 AM

The last time this happened was on April 22. I've checked my data from slightly less than 3 months:

This seems to be right around the time the issue happened, but not quite, parser seemed to stop on the 24th for some reason, it was attempting to parse a few days after that but once it was past 2 days, the query wasn't returning anything. I didn't realize it and get it going again until the 29th, which is why there were a bunch of flags "created" on the 29th when the parser finally captured them (flags 1691 - 1763).

Query should be OK now though. It was checking the prior 2 days based on the current date, now it will check the past 2 days based on the last creation date of the most recent flag parsed. Previously, if there are no flags returned, it wouldn't attempt parsing. So now if days go by without any new flags, or the parser stops parsing them for some reason, it should just keep re-parsing based on the most recent flags date.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ibminer on May 03, 2020, 08:26:31 PM

or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?

The last time this happened was on April 22. I've checked my data from slightly less than 3 months:

Code:

2020-05-07 06:04:12: 1790 Flags
2020-05-06 06:01:52: 1783 Flags
2020-05-05 08:07:41: 1780 Flags
2020-05-04 07:07:26: 1776 Flags
2020-05-03 08:32:33: 1775 Flags
2020-05-02 08:48:31: 1770 Flags
2020-05-01 07:11:34: 1769 Flags
2020-04-30 06:01:57: 1763 Flags
2020-04-29 05:56:25: 1704 Flags
2020-04-28 05:56:27: 1700 Flags
2020-04-27 05:55:18: 1697 Flags
2020-04-26 08:43:30: 1694 Flags
2020-04-25 05:54:33: 1690 Flags
2020-04-24 08:26:16: 1688 Flags
2020-04-23 06:05:31: 1682 Flags
2020-04-22 05:56:28: 1681 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-04-21 08:52:49: 1681 Flags
2020-04-20 08:39:59: 1678 Flags
2020-04-19 06:12:35: 1674 Flags
2020-04-18 08:28:59: 1672 Flags
2020-04-17 05:54:08: 1670 Flags
2020-04-16 05:52:18: 1666 Flags
2020-04-15 05:51:34: 1664 Flags
2020-04-14 05:49:35: 1655 Flags
2020-04-13 05:50:50: 1651 Flags
2020-04-12 05:49:26: 1646 Flags
2020-04-11 05:49:28: 1638 Flags
2020-04-10 05:47:48: 1622 Flags
2020-04-09 05:48:02: 1618 Flags
2020-04-08 05:43:16: 1564 Flags
2020-04-07 05:42:50: 1547 Flags
2020-04-06 05:40:43: 1540 Flags
2020-04-05 05:40:17: 1533 Flags
2020-04-04 05:39:24: 1520 Flags
2020-04-03 05:43:45: 1515 Flags
2020-04-01 05:39:00: 1513 Flags
2020-03-31 05:39:14: 1508 Flags
2020-03-30 05:37:49: 1504 Flags
2020-03-29 05:36:21: 1501 Flags
2020-03-28 20:13:03: 1500 Flags
2020-03-26 08:05:49: 1495 Flags
2020-03-25 05:36:38: 1490 Flags
2020-03-24 05:36:11: 1483 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-23 05:35:42: 1483 Flags
2020-03-22 05:36:17: 1481 Flags
2020-03-21 05:35:27: 1478 Flags
2020-03-20 05:34:41: 1473 Flags
2020-03-19 05:34:10: 1471 Flags
2020-03-18 05:33:45: 1468 Flags
2020-03-17 05:33:39: 1463 Flags
2020-03-16 05:33:14: 1459 Flags
2020-03-15 05:32:31: 1457 Flags
2020-03-14 05:31:43: 1455 Flags
2020-03-13 05:31:39: 1452 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-12 05:32:35: 1452 Flags
2020-03-11 05:31:40: 1449 Flags
2020-03-10 05:31:45: 1443 Flags
2020-03-09 05:31:09: 1438 Flags
2020-03-08 05:30:51: 1435 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-07 05:31:32: 1435 Flags
2020-03-06 05:30:53: 1433 Flags
2020-03-05 05:29:35: 1431 Flags
2020-03-04 05:29:52: 1429 Flags
2020-03-03 05:29:26: 1426 Flags
2020-03-02 05:28:58: 1421 Flags
2020-03-01 05:28:40: 1420 Flags
2020-02-29 05:28:41: 1415 Flags
2020-02-28 05:28:41: 1411 Flags
2020-02-27 05:28:15: 1407 Flags
2020-02-26 05:26:56: 1400 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-02-25 05:28:19: 1400 Flags
2020-02-24 05:27:48: 1398 Flags
2020-02-23 05:37:03: 1397 Flags
2020-02-22 05:27:22: 1396 Flags
2020-02-21 05:26:54: 1392 Flags
2020-02-20 05:26:57: 1390 Flags
2020-02-19 05:26:42: 1386 Flags
2020-02-18 05:27:25: 1383 Flags
2020-02-17 05:26:34: 1379 Flags < no new Flags for two days
2020-02-16 05:26:11: 1379 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-02-15 05:25:16: 1379 Flags
2020-02-14 05:25:29: 1376 Flags
2020-02-13 05:25:06: 1372 Flags
2020-02-12 05:25:10: 1371 Flags
2020-02-11 05:24:45: 1369 Flags
2020-02-10 12:48:39: 1366 Flags

I didn't expect this many days without new Flags being created.

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on May 07, 2020, 03:28:27 AM

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

The first entry is not a "change".

OmegaStarScream

staff

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6152

Quote from: ibminer on May 03, 2020, 08:26:31 PM

edit: I should also mention there was an issue with the flaglog.aspx which I corrected recently, seems my formula for parsing the prior 2 days worth of flags more frequently fails when it stalls for 2 days.. or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?... and then it returned 'null'. Hopefully this is corrected now.

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on April 22, 2020, 07:09:03 AM

Quote from: ibminer on April 04, 2020, 06:31:41 PM

It was actually like this in the past, but it didn't make sense (or match) with the current layout of the main page and how it displays ranks (via the shared rank table). Would need to do some serious reconstruction on the front page if we wanted to do it this way.

I'm sorry to say I don't understand your answer - perhaps you could walk me through it...

It's quite simple... the main page has a 'rank' table that lists a static 1-100 which is shared among the other tables. Originally, each table had its own 'rank' but this was requested by Vod at one point in the design process to get a cleaner look, which I actually liked. Unfortunately, it makes sharing ranks across multiple tables somewhat difficult/impossible with the way it is currently designed. So, as I said, it would need some reconstruction, which I'm not opposed to, but it is not at the top of the priority list at this point.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on April 22, 2020, 07:09:03 AM

Over on this page: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted <--- Assuming you have gotten over your fear of links that I post from third party sites) Roll Eyes

You posting a link to BPIP.org is completely different than a google doc, but keep trollin'! Grin

Likely a resource issue that caused a time-out, should have resolved itself.

Quote from: LoyceV on April 25, 2020, 03:22:04 AM

Quote

no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

It's amazing how not going out still eats up time Tongue

Ya, I really thought I would have more time... my presence at home seems to indicate I have to do *every* house project I'm behind on in the house, not to mention the majority of my job, which can be done remotely, plus appeasing kids who need attention 24x7. lol, this shit is crazy... nonetheless, I'm doing what I can do protect others, and myself.

Stay safe & healthy everyone!!

edit: I should also mention there was an issue with the flaglog.aspx which I corrected recently, seems my formula for parsing the prior 2 days worth of flags more frequently fails when it stalls for 2 days.. or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?... and then it returned 'null'. Hopefully this is corrected now.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Csmiami on May 01, 2020, 10:04:47 AM

Checked, and he does show up https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2749610

That's because I fixed it just recently, and a few other missing profiles. Still not sure why exactly that's happening, will do some research later. Right now all profile IDs above 2000000 should be ok.

Csmiami

copper member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1325

I'm sometimes known as "miniadmin"

Quote from: Jawhead999 on May 01, 2020, 04:29:21 AM

---

Checked, and he does show up https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2749610

Jawhead999

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1210

Hi guys, want to ask

Why this user CryptoboyRamesh has not appeared in BPIP? I have do both search using his ID 2749610 and his username
But, I found no result. Any problem about this case? Huh

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Have just crashed the site: https://bpip.org/error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/r/dt1changes.aspx

Quote

An exception has occurred.

Please contact someone from the BPIP Team or check the Support page for information on reporting errors.

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

Looking at that banned profile > https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1163424
In the Trust Feedback Information he has 0 negative feedback but it is makred with red color.
On the other hand on the MATR information you have -2 in feedback. Last Parsed: 320 days, but the trust seems updated.
Strange, right?

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: suchmoon on April 24, 2020, 06:12:57 PM

It's probably because in the past merits were being scraped differently and/or gaps in the data were filled in from other sources, which may have had no titles for deleted posts. Sometime in January (I think) I changed the scraper to use each user's merit history, which goes back 120 days so it's far less likely to have deleted gaps and it would display "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" when applicable as you noticed in gmaxwell's profile. Older data may need some manual intervention. I'll add it to my list of TODOs that keeps growing...

For if it helps: as far as I know http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt is still complete. Every week, I replace the last 113 days with theymos' new 120 day data dump, so it includes any manual changes theymos did in the last 113 days.

Quote

no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

It's amazing how not going out still eats up time Tongue

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on April 24, 2020, 05:32:46 PM

Reposting this again, as I wasn't entirely sure whether this was an actual bug or not...

If you check the merit's history of some users (an example from my profile), you can see that in some cases, the "post" cell is blank.

At first, I thought it was because these posts were getting deleted or moved to the trashcan, but after checking this profile, I noticed that the "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" is being displayed properly..so it must be something else?

It's probably because in the past merits were being scraped differently and/or gaps in the data were filled in from other sources, which may have had no titles for deleted posts. Sometime in January (I think) I changed the scraper to use each user's merit history, which goes back 120 days so it's far less likely to have deleted gaps and it would display "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" when applicable as you noticed in gmaxwell's profile. Older data may need some manual intervention. I'll add it to my list of TODOs that keeps growing... no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: Timelord2067 on April 22, 2020, 07:09:03 AM

...

Both have just one score (20) - it makes no sense to say one is 229 ranks better than the other one.

I have a follow-up question about the Most Trusted page namely how often does the page update?

Why I ask is because I believe my score for nearly a week should be 71 not 70 which would give me a rank of 228/229 tieing with mnightwaffle and asche

Then, with my score being 228/9 instead of 230(244)258 <--- about midway through those who have an equal score of "70" my Most Recognised score *should* be a few steps higher at 783 tieing at 34th place with Carlton Banks

However, *if* you are calculating the score as being one point per 36.5 days, then my score would be mid 68.5 to 69.5 at this point. Either way my score isn't 70.

Thanks again.

OmegaStarScream

staff

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6152

Reposting this again, as I wasn't entirely sure whether this was an actual bug or not...

If you check the merit's history of some users (an example from my profile), you can see that in some cases, the "post" cell is blank.

At first, I thought it was because these posts were getting deleted or moved to the trashcan, but after checking other profiles(like this one for instance), I noticed that the "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" is being displayed properly..so it must be something else?

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: ibminer on April 04, 2020, 06:31:41 PM

It was actually like this in the past, but it didn't make sense (or match) with the current layout of the main page and how it displays ranks (via the shared rank table). Would need to do some serious reconstruction on the front page if we wanted to do it this way.

I'm sorry to say I don't understand your answer - perhaps you could walk me through it...

Over on this page: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted <--- Assuming you have gotten over your fear of links that I post from third party sites) Roll Eyes

User mstrongbow has a score of 20 which gives his rank as 1,000.

Scrolling up six full pages, user TTBit also has a score of 20 yet his rank is 771.

How have the rankings been determined so that a full 229 users have the exact same scores yet their ranks are skewered so distortedly? Neither has posted in over a year.

By giving mstrongbow a score of 1,000 his rank is far lower than TTBit *even though* they have the same score.

It then becomes a never ending circle - distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on this page, then that distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on another page. That page's distorted score is then used on the first page to calculate a distorted score (and 'round it goes).

Both have just one shield:

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

Both have just one score (20) - it makes no sense to say one is 229 ranks better than the other one.

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Quote from: suchmoon on April 20, 2020, 03:20:17 PM

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on April 20, 2020, 03:03:19 PM

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?

Interesting. Looks like a BPIP bug but I'm not sure how this could happen. Maybe some issue with the "Today" in the timestamps.

There's a same issue with some other profiles. All of them are not like the one already mentioned.
For example, this profile woke up twice. But both are on one day.

I could find an archived page of seclog.
All information inside the box below has been recorded twice.

Profiles on BPIP:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1087317
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1171969
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1120712
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=332403
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=512797
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=230052
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=218267
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1446383
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=715168
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2535561
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=988720

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on April 20, 2020, 03:03:19 PM

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?

Interesting. Looks like a BPIP bug but I'm not sure how this could happen. Maybe some issue with the "Today" in the timestamps.

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?

Source: BPIP

This user woke up two times in 24 hours.

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: LoyceV on April 15, 2020, 03:45:00 AM

My guess is they don't have any DT1-inclusions, so they're not on DT2 at all. Something similar to my previous suggestion not to show those, as they're "irrelevant" to DefaultTrust.

It's more DT1 exclusion than inclusion as well. I mean DT1 inclusion < DT1 exclusion.
When theymos compiled the DT1 for this month, all of these users had DT1 inclusion > DT1 exclusion but after the compilation some users who trusted/distrusted them has changed their minds and perhaps new DT1 came and excluded also which eventually made more DT1 exclusion then DT1 inclusion they had.

I think it makes sense :-P

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Timelord2067 on April 15, 2020, 03:10:29 AM

Each one of these instances I've noticed it's the end of the line where (for whatever reason) there is not DT1/DT2 logo.

My guess is they don't have any DT1-inclusions, so they're not on DT2 at all. Something similar to my previous suggestion not to show those, as they're "irrelevant" to DefaultTrust.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

I'm having trouble taking a screen shot at the moment. This is just a question about the dt1 page. I've noticed a couple of users don't show up as DT1 or DT2, is this a thing, or is it a glitch?

Quote

4/13/2020 3:49:48 PM    DT2 selection    JayJuanGee DT1 no longer trusts JimboToronto
4/13/2020 3:49:48 PM    DT2 selection    JayJuanGee DT1 no longer trusts yefi

4/11/2020 3:59:04 PM    DT2 selection    minerjones DT1 no longer trusts SenPai

4/5/2020 2:26:39 PM    DT2 selection    owlcatz DT1 no longer distrusts chickinini

3/19/2020 4:35:08 PM    DT2 selection    CryptopreneurBrainboss DT1 no longer trusts Heisenberg_Hunter
3/19/2020 4:35:08 PM    DT2 selection    CryptopreneurBrainboss DT1 no longer trusts LogitechMouse

3/18/2020 7:13:28 AM    DT2 selection    willi9974 DT1 no longer trusts tom04137

2/25/2020 8:42:59 AM    DT2 selection    Royse777 DT1 no longer trusts Little Mouse

2/22/2020 2:01:59 PM    DT2 selection    Ratimov DT1 no longer trusts FS2018
2/22/2020 2:01:59 PM    DT2 selection    Ratimov DT1 no longer distrusts lin_lin

2/22/2020 2:01:59 PM    DT2 selection    Ratimov DT1 no longer distrusts nadosuge

2/10/2020 10:31:49 AM    DT2 selection    KTChampions DT1 no longer distrusts Zuzma

Each one of these instances I've noticed it's the end of the line where (for whatever reason) there is not DT1/DT2 logo.

Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 32. (Read 21951 times)