"Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.
New owners....
I got that. But it makes no sense. It's like a race where people don't start at the same point but have the same finish line
Topic: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] - page 34. (Read 21862 times)
New owners....
I got that. But it makes no sense. It's like a race where people don't start at the same point but have the same finish line
"Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.
New owners....
Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?
You can still see the ranking based on earned merit using the link below.
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=earnedmerit
Read this post
Thanks for your answer.
I know that, but it doesn't tell me why the change. "Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.
Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?
You can still see the ranking based on earned merit using the link below.
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=earnedmerit
Read this post
Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?
Is there any way to scroll past JollyGood's thousands+ distrusts?
Those users without any DT1-inclusions can/should probably be omitted from the list entirely. 
Is there any way to scroll past JollyGood's thousands+ distrusts?
https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx
(It just goes on-and-on...)
I also can't search any user name on that page.
https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx
(It just goes on-and-on...)
I also can't search any user name on that page.
According to the picture below, I have received 466 merit and sent 224 merit. So, the merit ratio should be 0.48 not 1.07.
I had reported this on Vod's topic before. But since the bug still exists, I posted it here again.
Source: BPIP
I had reported this on Vod's topic before. But since the bug still exists, I posted it here again.
Source: BPIP
Sorry to hear that. Are you the sick one, or is your job health related?
No, I'm not sick yet, and not even directly related to healthcare. But I have customers who either need extra support these days (increased sales volumes for the few businesses that are not shut down) or need extra help winding their businesses down. Also for some inexplicable reason some people refuse to work from home even though they were perfectly capable of working remotely before this, so I get to cover for them too, yay.
Plus the tax season, that's always fun even in a good year.
Stay safe everyone. Check on your elderly neighbors every day (while staying politely distant of course).
Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.
Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.
Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.
I'll wipe those out manually once I get to it. Unfortunately I'm busy dealing with the fallout from the real virus so it might take a while.
Turns out it was Halab's very own april fool joke for us.
Sorry to hear that. Are you the sick one, or is your job health related?
Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.
Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.
Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.
I'll wipe those out manually once I get to it. Unfortunately I'm busy dealing with the fallout from the real virus so it might take a while.
Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.
Thanks, and it's changed back to normal, so the same thing happened again.A year ago, I wrote this:
You had 222 replies deleted
Now, this link shows Posts deleted by moderators: 0". Was this data lost? I'm curious: how did this happen?
Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.
Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.
I'm curious: how did this happen?
Small suggestion.
The hourglass for those inactive accounts which we have on the home page, is it possible to have it the sane on the lists with top 1000 users? Or maybe a way to sort out users in the lists based on the Last Active?
The hourglass for those inactive accounts which we have on the home page, is it possible to have it the sane on the lists with top 1000 users? Or maybe a way to sort out users in the lists based on the Last Active?
I suggested this before >
Yes that makes sense. I couldn't recall the exact post, so thanks for reposting it. I figured I'd post the example in case you needed more statistical data on the issue.
Have just spotted this glitch:
I suggested this before >
One suggestion for when you have time.
Those accounts that wake up in the security log, can be listed to be parsed as well, so accounts like this one below should not be marked as inactive while they were active just a few days ago.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nielsg-123376
Maybe you can parse an account only when this account becomes active. If it gets banned during that time it will appear in the modlog together with the deleted posts by mods.
The merit data is reflected in the merit log.
The only thing that can be changed is the post count ( if a thread gets trashed or posts are deleted in a self-moderated thread).
Those accounts that wake up in the security log, can be listed to be parsed as well, so accounts like this one below should not be marked as inactive while they were active just a few days ago.
Quote
Last Parsed: 46 days (Planned for 43 days from now)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nielsg-123376
Maybe you can parse an account only when this account becomes active. If it gets banned during that time it will appear in the modlog together with the deleted posts by mods.
The merit data is reflected in the merit log.
The only thing that can be changed is the post count ( if a thread gets trashed or posts are deleted in a self-moderated thread).
Is there any way we can collapse entries such as this: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=857883
Thanks for reading.
Have just spotted this glitch:
Thanks for reading.
Have just spotted this glitch:
DT Change Log now shows this:
I'll take some time to think on it but my initial thoughts are referring to this as a "Persona Feedback Network" "inclusions" and "exclusions" would be fine with almost no negative connotation. What's the 4th category? I'm on mobile at the moment.
How about this:Quote
Trust list for: LoyceMobile (Trust: neutral) (95 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-09-28_Sat_06.17h)
Back to index
LoyceMobile Trusts these users' judgement:
-
LoyceMobile Distrusts these users' judgement:
-
Back to index
LoyceMobile Trusts these users' judgement:
-
LoyceMobile Distrusts these users' judgement:
-
Interesting. I've seen discrepancies that were due to variations between my personal trust list and Default Trust, but in this case DT show 3 negative ratings while Bpip only shows 2.
Last updated 13 days ago, i.e. before the most recent DT1 update. My guess is that one of those DT ratings was not a DT rating 13 days ago.
It also lists the user's "trust color" as dark green despite having the same number of positive and negative ratings. There does seem to be a bug in that user's calculation.
Kind of. Works as described but perhaps not quite logically. "Aged" positive ratings are 10 points each, and negatives are counted as 2^(number of distinct negatives) so the sum total is still positive and greater than 10, i.e. dark green. We are planning to rethink DT scoring and all that stuff at some point.
Jump to: