BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! - page 15.

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: tmfp on May 03, 2016, 11:24:16 AM

http://www.drcraigwright.net/extraordinary-claims-require-extraordinary-proof/

Wow, will this guy's plagiarism never stop?
He's even stealing my signature now!
Wink

FWIW, you'll know the dude's fuck when he starts quoting me and adds HAHAHA at the end of his techno babble.

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

next big thing will be a dr.wright client with GA as the lead developer.

mark my words!

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 03, 2016, 11:09:04 AM

Quote from: CIYAM on May 03, 2016, 11:03:41 AM

Quote from: Cuidler on May 03, 2016, 10:59:50 AM

There are no facts I know of why Gavin Andresen's creditability should take any hit so far.

The fact that Gavin has said he believes this guy to be Satoshi when his false signature claim was debunked within hours shows that Gavin has lost all credibility (where is Gavin's response to the debunking?).

Someone who (still?) likes to call himself the Chief Bitcoin Scientist (although he should not be using such a title as he doesn't even have commit access to the repo now) should lose all credibility for simply being so easily fooled.

I'm hoping Gavin wasn't really there because he was out taking in the London scenery while the meeting took place and he was simply using second-hand info garnered from Jon.

Including the part where Gavin uses the email exchange between himself and Satoshi as proof that CSW is indeed Satoshi? I'd say that Gavin dug himself so deep a hole that not even Chantha Owen Lueung and Leroy Fodor combined while cupping the balls of Marshall Long can dig him out.

moneyart

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Why doesn't he (Wright) make a post in this forum. I thought that Satoshi Nakamoto had an account on bitcointalk.org?

The real Satoshi can't make a post because that is too dangerous. Tor has been cracked by CIA.

SparklingFire

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

This guy is a joke. I hope the real Satoshi is enjoying his popcorn right now.

adamstgBit

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1037

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 03, 2016, 02:59:46 PM

Quote from: knowhow on May 03, 2016, 02:52:36 PM

Soo if this is Nakamoto real he can moove his coins into some wallet and sign a message making the proof that he really is the person he claims to be,does this has already been confirmed?I havent read all the pages im trying to get updated ,just someone let me know if this is the person under bitcoin,if is or not i wanna say thanks for bitcoin.

what we know for sure there is an agenda!

that would be to increase block size by leveraging his stardom

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on May 03, 2016, 10:10:35 AM

Moving some bitcoins should proof something , no ?

My guess is that Jon Matonis or Gavin Andresen is CSW's new spokesperson.

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Quote from: knowhow on May 03, 2016, 02:52:36 PM

Soo if this is Nakamoto real he can moove his coins into some wallet and sign a message making the proof that he really is the person he claims to be,does this has already been confirmed?I havent read all the pages im trying to get updated ,just someone let me know if this is the person under bitcoin,if is or not i wanna say thanks for bitcoin.

what we know for sure there is an agenda!

knowhow

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Soo if this is Nakamoto real he can moove his coins into some wallet and sign a message making the proof that he really is the person he claims to be,does this has already been confirmed?I havent read all the pages im trying to get updated ,just someone let me know if this is the person under bitcoin,if is or not i wanna say thanks for bitcoin.

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: ebliever on May 03, 2016, 08:29:20 AM

Quote from: tmfp on May 03, 2016, 08:21:20 AM

More from the BBC Grin

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36193006

Quote

Craig Wright's spokesman told the BBC that he would "move a coin from an early block" belonging to the crypto-currency's inventor "in the coming days".

How many "days" does he need to prepare his next magic trick? I can move any of my coins in a few minutes, tops. This is ridiculous. How gullible can anyone be?

He has first to write a 10,000 words post which we will have to digest and summarize as :
- Go to https://blockchain.info/block-index/14858/000000008d9dc510f23c2657fc4f67bea30078cc05a90eb89e84cc475c080805
That's the block #9, the famous block which Satoshi used to send coins to Hal.
- Click on the address starting with 12cb..., that's Satoshi's address
- See the last transaction that happened on 2016-05-03 13:34:00 ? That's me, Craig Wrigth, who did it.
- Already 4 confirmations that I am Satoshi !

Looks like Hal is gonna have spendin' moneys on the day they thaw him out: https://blockchain.info/address/1ByLSV2gLRcuqUmfdYcpPQH8Npm8cccsFg

https://blockchain.info/tx/a3b0e9e7cddbbe78270fa4182a7675ff00b92872d8df7d14265a2b1e379a9d33

Quote

18SH9vwx24L5cTabfkgtGMjF8A56pD9AUJ (50 BTC - Output)
15NUwyBYrZcnUgTagsm1A7M2yL2GntpuaZ (1 BTC - Output)
1ByLSV2gLRcuqUmfdYcpPQH8Npm8cccsFg (10 BTC - Output)

That's interesting! It looks like the infamous 10 BTC wasn't the first transaction. The 1 BTC was.

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: sbogovac on May 03, 2016, 09:03:53 AM

Quote from: ebliever on May 03, 2016, 08:29:20 AM

[...]How many "days" does he need to prepare his next magic trick? [...]How gullible can anyone be?

In two weeks™. Grin

Would you say that Craig Steven Wright is on a good track now?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1207670

Quote

My life continued and I started to look for a new project to begin again. A fresh start. I'm on a good track now, trying to put the past behind me.

stereotype

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on May 03, 2016, 02:24:34 PM

Quote from: stereotype on May 03, 2016, 04:26:27 AM

Would the anonymous Satoshi, in Jan 2014, change a company name from something very nondescript (Moving Forward in Business LIMITED), to CO1N LTD? Makes no sense. And who is the 24 year old Ms Uyen T Nguyen?

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08248988/filing-history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman

Quote

Dave Kleiman (1967 – April 26, 2013) was a noted Forensic Computer Investigator, an author/coauthor of multiple books and a noted speaker at security related events. He died in his home in April 2013 of complications from MRSA.

For what it's worth, Dave can still vote in Chicago, mostly likely for Democrats.

No.
That date refers to 'electronic format' entry date. Check the date on the cert (14-10-2012). And check the termination cert above (26-04-2013).

Nearly

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Gleb are you ale to find this InfoWorld article about Bitcoin in early 2010?

i want to know if it could be true or if the basement of Gavin Andresens involvement into Bitcoin has something to do with his visit in Australia.

EDIT: found it.

http://www.cio.com/article/2417561/innovation/7-open-source-innovations-on-the-cutting-edge.html#slide4

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: bitkilo on May 03, 2016, 05:40:41 AM

Quote from: V.Lace on May 03, 2016, 04:54:34 AM

I am going to say this, I think the real Satoshi is paying these guys off to throw everyone off to finding him, the real satoshi, does not want to be found, there is no point for him to be found. He is a man of humility and this is not the way he will come out. The Japanes guy had more of a chance to be him then then Craig Wright

Nah if the real Satoshi was behind this pulling the strings he would have at least made it believable.
Looks like Gavin really got taken in by this. Why didn't he just make no comment until he had time to think it through and double check the "proof" himself, a man in his position should know never to rush big decisions.

Gavin had plenty of time for assessment, including literally rubbing shoulders with peers at the conference in NYC prior to the panel discussion where he defends his assessment up to taking questions from the audience.

BCEmporium

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1000

Move a coin?! Huh

There's no doubt this guy is not Satoshi! How otherwise it will go that the creator of Bitcoin doesn't even know how bitcoin works?!

There are simple and assertive ways to prove yourself as Satoshi, if you are him:

- Satoshi has a known PGP Key, just sign something with it.
- Sign something using a known-to-belong to Satoshi address.

And we do know Satoshi knows how to do things the proper way, the Genesis Block is such proof, with a newspaper headline encoded on it. This guy however just goes by far fetched senseless crap, like encoded pieces on the block chain, now move coins...

Mr Felt

hero member

Activity: 493

Merit: 518

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 03, 2016, 01:20:53 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on May 03, 2016, 01:13:52 PM

I believe the closest we have to Satoshi these last years, is this: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

That particular email is not known to be hacked (but we can't say for sure that it isn't), there is no spoofing involved, and he also had to register and verify the email to the mailing list:

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010329.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010327.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010334.html

The writing style and essence of what is written does not have any troll like qualities like the spoofed "I'm not craig wright, we are all satoshi" message that appeared a few months later. The August one isn't spoofed, it is serious and consistent in writing style, while also trying to "sneak in" some comment of concern for bitcoin itself - as far as node incentives go. Kind'a like, since I broke my silence, let me also say this that is bothering me for a while.

As far as I'm concerned it is legit with very high probability. Which, in turn, would imply that if I'm right then Satoshi was alive a few months ago. It would also imply that Craig Wright writing with one space, instead of two, is fraudulent, and that no writing style change has occurred for Satoshi, despite the passing of time since 2010.

SN biggest mistake? Gavin Andresen!!

let us watch what is coming next from mr. wright. with the logic above in mind it is not "big blocks".

Unless Gavin is Satoshi/part of Satoshi. Craig could be proxy or cover for someone or something else, including Gavin, Mantonis, etc. It is clear that the evidence Gavin et al saw was totally different than what came out yesterday. The crowd took the opportunity to bash Gavin, but probably the media deserved more criticism than it got IMHO (the media should know by now its risky to take on a Satoshi reveal article - but I guess BBC didn't get the memo (why'd they choose them anyway, why not a tech journalist or personality who would understand what was happening). Perhaps the intent of yesterday was discredit the media and the traditional news cycle (and manipulators thereof) as a lesson (and assume yesterday was not about discrediting Gavin).

In the alternative, perhaps w/ his tax issues, Craig needs a job and trying to demo his core dev credentials to blockstream. <--- Joke, no ill will intended twd Blockstream.

Gleb Gamow

vip

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1145

Quote from: stereotype on May 03, 2016, 04:26:27 AM

Would the anonymous Satoshi, in Jan 2014, change a company name from something very nondescript (Moving Forward in Business LIMITED), to CO1N LTD? Makes no sense. And who is the 24 year old Ms Uyen T Nguyen?

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08248988/filing-history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman

Quote

Dave Kleiman (1967 – April 26, 2013) was a noted Forensic Computer Investigator, an author/coauthor of multiple books and a noted speaker at security related events. He died in his home in April 2013 of complications from MRSA.

For what it's worth, Dave can still vote in Chicago, mostly likely for Democrats.

adamstgBit

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1037

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: tuvok007 on May 03, 2016, 02:21:36 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 02:09:50 PM

Quote from: CIYAM on May 03, 2016, 12:10:18 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 12:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

I think you should just look at Coblee's post (no need for the big song and dance and especially showing a bunch of console stuff that is meaningless to 99.9% of people).

This is simply typical misdirection.

And if you are so sure that this guy is Satoshi would you care to take a (say 10 BTC) bet on it?

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

I bet 1 btc that he is satoshi but he gave us that stupid proof so that people thinks he is just a ridicule and we all leave him alone.Satoshi is Craig Wright but he wants us to believe that he is definitely not Satoshi.

but now that hes thought about it some more he has decied to go ahead with the full on proof no one can deny.

coming soon a TX from an early block known to be a SN address

tuvok007

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1001

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 02:09:50 PM

Quote from: CIYAM on May 03, 2016, 12:10:18 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 12:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

I think you should just look at Coblee's post (no need for the big song and dance and especially showing a bunch of console stuff that is meaningless to 99.9% of people).

This is simply typical misdirection.

And if you are so sure that this guy is Satoshi would you care to take a (say 10 BTC) bet on it?

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

I bet 1 btc that he is satoshi but he gave us that stupid proof so that people thinks he is just a ridicule and we all leave him alone.Satoshi is Craig Wright but he wants us to believe that he is definitely not Satoshi.

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Can feel it in my bones, he's not SN. Its just not Satoshi's way

Topic: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! - page 15. (Read 42371 times)