Antics aside, money changed hands and BFL appears to have reneged on terms of the sale. My guess is that the Missouri AG consumer complaints dept. would be a good avenue to pursue if you aren't satisfied with your purchase and negotiations fall through. I have worked with them in the past and they are very fastidious about consumer complaints.
I have no strong feelings about BFL other than they seem to be terrible at PR, have missed several deadlines, but have very attractive products from a price/performance and aesthetic POV.
Disclaimer: I do mine on EMC but I have no connection w/BFL other than almost making a pre-order.
The Missouri AG Consumer Complaints Dept will give exactly as many fucks as his complaint warrants: 0.
Most state laws actually REQUIRE you to offer a refund if you are unable to deliver within 30 days of your initial targeted delivery date (backorders included), alternately, you may offer to extend the time limit, with confirmed consent from the customer, but you're not required to offer the extension. You ARE required to offer the refund.
Go into an AG office and complain that, "A company 'unethically' refunded my money when I complained about the wait time for my order." Be sure to take a video camera, and post the video of their reaction on Youtube for us all to watch!
They could have refused to take his money for all of those reasons, but it looks to me like they are discriminating against him for some reason. When they took his money, it was a contract, one that BFL made and accepted. I hope the discrimination is not based on race, sex or religion or group of association or Xian can actually get the federal government to help with his case.
Nope, he told the COO to "eat a bag of dicks" and among several other things
No, in fact he did not. Inaba has made it VERY clear that he posts as Inaba when he is his own man. He is only BFL_Josh (josh zerlan of BFL labs) when he posts under that name.
You cannot have it both ways.
Inaba is still the COO of the company, so the point is valid, as is the "among several other things" part of that post. Making personal enemies of the owners of a company you want to do business with is bad policy in and of itself, but he also sought/seeks to continually defame the company itself, as well as other owners/officers of the company.
If you hate a company enough to talk shit about them on a DAILY basis, you're probably not somebody worth doing business with. His complaint was that they weren't sending the product he paid for soon enough, so they resolved it, and made it a product he hasn't paid for, freeing up a few thousand dollars to go spend on something else.
"Refund given, complaint resolved. Neeeext!"