Topic: Buy back ICO tokens after ICO (Read 1129 times)
The recent market has proven to us that there is no need for ICOs. If they want to issue tokens or coins, they should just issue them and list them on an exchange. Investors will then buy the tokens for its usage. There is no sense in buying and then waiting for listing on an exchange. Investors keep making loses each and every day.
no problem, but based on what often happens, the token after launching in the market will decrease as the dump occurs. so it's better to buy before ico.
Actually, buyback program is not a good way and not a bad way for ICO tokens.
The buyback program is the one way to keep the price stable and reduce the fluctuations for ICO tokens.
And there are some people who say that the buyback program is a way to manipulate the ICO tokens prices and can reduce the credibility of the ICO tokens.
So how is it not a good way? Buying back is one of the most visible way to say that the team is doing its job to protect their investor from great losses and thus we can say that the team is being dedicated to the project. The buyback program is the one way to keep the price stable and reduce the fluctuations for ICO tokens.
And there are some people who say that the buyback program is a way to manipulate the ICO tokens prices and can reduce the credibility of the ICO tokens.
not all of the ICO could deserve to be bought back when after ICO is completed. of the many existing ICO only a handful could produce. and on the selection of this analysis, the ICO will determine whether good or bad results of elections to the ICO that will be purchased. even this could be a strategy exactly where to get coins from the ICO is priced pretty cheap.
Being an investor, I would say they deserve to have a buy back program, after all it's the team's decision because they control the total amount of money raised during the ICO. With a buy back program, investors will happily accept it because it will help the price to stay at ICO price or increase the value, either way, it brings positive result to the investors. However, there should be some kind of limitation because amounts collected should be allocated more on the development side.
not all of the ICO could deserve to be bought back when after ICO is completed. of the many existing ICO only a handful could produce. and on the selection of this analysis, the ICO will determine whether good or bad results of elections to the ICO that will be purchased. even this could be a strategy exactly where to get coins from the ICO is priced pretty cheap.
it seems like it will be more difficult to do this. because the possibility of losing will be higher and may need more ability to analyze it. special ability is needed to make a profit by buying coins that deteriorate after the ICO 
not all of the ICO could deserve to be bought back when after ICO is completed. of the many existing ICO only a handful could produce. and on the selection of this analysis, the ICO will determine whether good or bad results of elections to the ICO that will be purchased. even this could be a strategy exactly where to get coins from the ICO is priced pretty cheap.
maybe some people don't buy coins after ICO,
but if I prefer to buy after the ICO ends,
and I bought it when bounty hunter participation sold all the prizes and caused the dumb market, and this was a good opportunity to buy.
yes that's the right step, I tried it in the previous year when the market was really bad so many ico tokens were worthless. , I took this opportunity to buy it and until now I still hold the token. if seen at this time there is no value but at least it is already on the stock exchange. but if I prefer to buy after the ICO ends,
and I bought it when bounty hunter participation sold all the prizes and caused the dumb market, and this was a good opportunity to buy.
Well, basically they will not have their profit if they use the ICO fund for buying back the tokens. In addition, they have their plan where they will going to use the funds for the project. The tokens are just for investors, by means of profit not the entire project itself.
many investors buy back just in case token ICO when it's finished and went on the market. the main purpose, of course, gets low prices from a lot of people who panic for fear of getting prices to plunge. However, only some ICO which is rated worth buying to deliver results. When only an arbitrary course in choosing ICO then precisely the rates there could be progressively falling.
Many ICO owner always buy buck after their ICO have success and listing on exchange market, they have buy back because their coin have lower price and its the way how to make their coin keep on higher price or the same with ICO price.
Some ICOs do have plans to repurchase their tokens but others don't have a plan in their whitepaper to do that. If the funds collected are used to buy the token again, how do they want to build and develop the project according to the roadmap in the whitepaper
Every project has their won decision and strategy to makes the project growth. One of the trick wound be by doing a buy back from the market. and others has another way to do it.
So every project should have their own way to take the project to success.
So every project should have their own way to take the project to success.
maybe some people don't buy coins after ICO,
but if I prefer to buy after the ICO ends,
and I bought it when bounty hunter participation sold all the prizes and caused the dumb market, and this was a good opportunity to buy.
but if I prefer to buy after the ICO ends,
and I bought it when bounty hunter participation sold all the prizes and caused the dumb market, and this was a good opportunity to buy.
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
Like not all projects do the same thing. Because the Project requires funds for the development of their projects. If the project has developed it will certainly make growth in the price of their tokens. But what you say actually makes sense too. Why not buy tokens at low prices. I just thought about what you said.
During those two years during which I am on the forum I met a fairly small number of projects that would offer their bounty hunters the opportunity to buy back the tokens they had earned - at market price, and I believe that this could be pretty simple solution that would help avoid a fall in the price of tokens in exchange trading.
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
They are not too concerned about the price of their token. I think they use the money raised from ICO to use in their projects. If their projects are good and have products, then the price will go up quickly without having to buy back.just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
Before an ICO can think of buying back, then a lot of money would have been made. Take for instance, a project that is able to achieve the hardcap or very close to it, can still afford to develop the project, buy back and list on good exchanges.
Then there also some projects that do not have product or that the product is not working, if such should buy back, the team knows it will be a loss on their side. Which means such coin may not grow.
Then there also some projects that do not have product or that the product is not working, if such should buy back, the team knows it will be a loss on their side. Which means such coin may not grow.
Some projects organisers actually did the buy back policy and I know some of this project that a very successful.
Not all project would buy back there token.
And activities of bounty hunter can cause a drop in price
You should consider another factor too. In fact that when you are seeing an ico offers a big discount to the price of ico and then that can create a big dump too because the buyers have accumulated fast profits from dumping their tokens to the market. Not all project would buy back there token.
And activities of bounty hunter can cause a drop in price
Perhaps the developers of many projects do not believe in their coins and sell their own part when entering the exchange.
For me, making this or doing this thing is more risky but it also would make you even to gain more. If you ever find a good one and successful one pretty sure you'll become a millionaire.
but right now it's actually also very difficult to be able to find a projeck that really provides a lot of benefits for us because nowadays there are many unclear ico that exist Jump to: