Topic: Buy back ICO tokens after ICO - page 5. (Read 1129 times)
I think it's only depends on team of projects. what they thought about the project. as how much fund they used for development the project.
If they say that there will be a buy-back in their token, then they should do that. But only a few projects add such feature in their roadmap because they focus more on the development of their project or in building partnerships.
In my opinion, we can see what they are doing ICO for? they conducted this ICO to raise sufficient funds to develop their projects. so after the ICO, the funds they got were used for the development of their projects, and after their projects were truly successful, they would again buy their ICO Tokens at a fairly high price.
Why did they buy back their token. For them, those tokens are not important, they sold them from public sale and private sale. They will receive money from it and gradually leave their projects. Many ICOs have done so in 2018 and of course those are scam projects
I believe, for the team behind every project, they don't see any sign yet to make buy back orders. Maybe the are still expecting more dump or what. They might have not full faith with their project as well.
I see many ICO projects that use the concept, which is to buy back token after the ICO. what I understand from that method, the Buyback to hold off the release of tokens in the market, and this ICO company bought back so that the price of the token remained at ICO prices.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
Yea buy back after ICO is the best way to grow up the value of any token. But it is depends of the team members of that project.I saw this type of one project that named pund x (npxs). I saw this project grow the value of token approx 10x by buy back after ico. just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
Every team behind the ICO will have their considerations why they should buy or not buy back the coins from the bounty hunters. So far, actually, there are some ICO projects that do that kind of ways. However, most of them don't take this why because it may be too risky for the team.
Helbiz also did that and some other projects I can't remember.
And it makes sense, if they believe in the future of their project.
But the raised funds are usually planned for another expenses upfront and they don't have the resouces to do that.
And it makes sense, if they believe in the future of their project.
But the raised funds are usually planned for another expenses upfront and they don't have the resouces to do that.
The team will only buying backs their token if the project have already gain profits after their launching of the product. This is mostly the reason why such promising project will go dumps after the get listed on exchanges as the team can't afford to buy back due to the budget was only allocated for development at the early stage. Mostly some ICO has protection on their investors to control the market price but if the situation is getting worse due the downfall of bitcoin and ETH then they will end-up losing and the last thing they will do is to let the market stabilize before doing a buy-back.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2305
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Almost all of the ICO use BTC and ETH as a payment method for selling ICO token. Have you seen the price reduction in both of this coin? Some projects even are not able to conduct their project just because of it. How can they buy back the token even if it is a lower price, they have to pay more than they have collected from ICO.
Common OP I dont think buying back bounty hunters token will help projects to maintain their price on the exchange bounty hunters get only 1% to 3% of total allocation or total token sold. Take recent examples of projects like FIIICoin & Hyperquant, they are yet to distribute their tokens to bounty participants & their price has been already dropped around 50% to 80%. The ICOs need to shedule release of token strategy wise if they want to maintain their price as presale investors who get huge discounts at the time of token sale dumps their tokens when listed on exchange.
Because they do not understand this. The initial task of many projects is to make money on the project. Of course, if they did this they would improve the economy of their projects. Let's say for example hunters. Why admins can not redeem hunters tokens for half the price. After all, we will gladly sell them at such a cost.
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
You forgot the case of when they are not raising enough money from ICO. Another appropriate reason must be they themselves not believing into their own project. Buying back is a common practice even in corporate levels hence when some ICO is efusing to buy back when their tokens are available for cheaper then that will smell fishy.just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
As far as I have seen most ICO devs are not ready to work on the welfare its early contributors. They just want to secure what they have collected so that they can achieve what they have actually planned for.
because the money collected from ico is used for project development, so there's no way they will buy back when the price is cheap (this is I'm talking about if ico only reaches the softcap)
but if the project reaches hardcap it should do what you say because the funds raised are very large (but the team won't do that stupid thing) it's better they hold the funds until market grows again
but if the project reaches hardcap it should do what you say because the funds raised are very large (but the team won't do that stupid thing) it's better they hold the funds until market grows again
There are other ICO that included this to their roadmap, so better check all the ICO that you are involving, it is good if they have like that, it can stabilize the price of the coin and at the same time, they will be compelled to complete their platform because of this buy back features.
It depends on the plan of the people behind the project,some choose to buy back why some after burning they don't buy back,some would have probably buy back but because of the level of dump,they may see it as a waste buying back.
each project has a strategy to raise the price of their utility tokens, but what is happening now, many projects are reluctant to repurchase before their platforms work and produce ...
I think, it will not give much influence. More important is the development of the project, if it goes well and in accordance with their roadmap, it will automatically give a lot of influence to the price of their tokens
This is a very cool idea, because in this way today we will be able to organize normal projects that will have guarantees for projects. I can confidently say that today it would be great if you understand that such projects will definitely be appreciated.
Jump to: