Topic: Buy back ICO tokens after ICO - page 3. (Read 1129 times)
Yes, you are right, Couynting house is one of the few who tried to support their coins in this way, but there are projects that raised enough money to do so a bit!
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Sometimes, if I think the project was good enough and can get a better position in the future, I will buy after the ICO finished because I see that the price will get dump too deep and it helps me to buy at the very low price. I've already bought some tokens before at the low price, and I still hold until now because the price does not increase too high and I see the chance for this token to increase in someday. But I have a bad experience to buy after the ICO finished and it makes me sad to hold the tokens.
Buying back depend on the dev and team,though is a way of helping price to grow but that dies not make it compulsory for the to do,if the dev and team feel that that is the best for then,they can do that and if they feel otherwise is their choice afternoon all,is a choice to participate in ICO.
Why, because each team the have of own the strategy, and maybe they think of they strategy is the best, although person say otherwise. But I think the bbb (buy back bounty) system is good strategy. But unfortunately, only some ICO use the bbb system for they bounty, still a little bit.
Whatever it is, I am sure the ICO team will always do the best for they community and user of they platform.
- Keep smiling
Whatever it is, I am sure the ICO team will always do the best for they community and user of they platform.
- Keep smiling
I think that depends on the plan of the dev and the team at large,some have the plan of buying back and why some don't have such plan,some even have the plan but situation if the market might make then change their mind.
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
the dev team need money to develop the project my friend
so, the money collected during the crowdsale is used to develop the project
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
the dev team need money to develop the project my friend
so, the money collected during the crowdsale is used to develop the project
Buy back is good but it showed less confidence on their project, it should be the investors who should be buying, not them.
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
The most important thing here is that they want to use that money to complete and run mainet their system rather than control the price at the beginning time
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
the dev team need money to develop the project my friend
so, the money collected during the crowdsale is used to develop the project
Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!
the dev team need money to develop the project my friend
so, the money collected during the crowdsale is used to develop the project
Many ICO are now failing in marketing because the day the new ico coin prices on the market will drop dramatically when the first ico coin appears on the market.
I think ICO coin buyers after the ICO will start crowded aftermarket prices soar, especially for Bitcoin and Ethereum. Because with the soaring market prices, of course, these ICO coins will be faster registered in the exchange market. And the price will also rise as happened in early 2018.
Depends if the token decrease you should buy again. If you see the token is more cheaper than the ICO price you can review it and if you see the chance to increase the value you can invest more. But mostly the token who lower the ICO price is not potential because in the first place the value is stable and it increasing.
To buy back is a good strategy, but a project the will buy back, would have achieved a lot.
The year's marketing has really been amazing.
The year's marketing has really been amazing.
I think most ICO project really don't care about the aftermath of listing their coin. They just keep the monies they generated without reinvesting into their own project. You are right countinghouse is doing buy backs which is really paying of.
Buying bounty hunter's token is an act of market manipulation. Though its a good thing for bounty hunters and may avoid price dumping because of these. I saw many ICO that after they give the token to hunters, the price of their token goes down because these hunters need money immediately and you can not control these once the token is release to them. In conclusion, the idea is somehow good but be careful not to make a huge involvement so that it may not look like market manipulation on large scale.
Even it looks like a market manipulation but that is our strategies, there is no need to be afraid of. We have different plans and strategies, and stick into it to be more profitable. Everything will be good unless you abuse the others right. Some crypto owners will do buying back to help their token price not to dump. 
Buying bounty hunter's token is an act of market manipulation. Though its a good thing for bounty hunters and may avoid price dumping because of these. I saw many ICO that after they give the token to hunters, the price of their token goes down because these hunters need money immediately and you can not control these once the token is release to them. In conclusion, the idea is somehow good but be careful not to make a huge involvement so that it may not look like market manipulation on large scale.
Maybe that would be better. Then the developers would be able to manage the price of their coins and would be able to avoid falling. This would save the investors, because they would know that they bought the coins at a bargain price.
Countinghouse perspective was good, but we cant really command that to all other ico. Because they have different insight on the project and different purpose. And their fund was meant on other things especially development purposes on their working product.
Repurchasing is one strategy to be able to retract a user's buying interest and this I see in the bobsrepair token where the team dev is trying to implement a buy back strategy and it can keep trading activities active even if the crypto price condition deteriorates.
Jump to: