We are the ICORating Team,
We prepared an Investment Review of โChronobankโ and assigned it a โStableโ ranking in terms of investment attractiveness; it should be noted that the project may be of particular interest to investors focused on long-term investments.
Read more in the report: http://icorating.com/project/23/ChronoBank
We prepared an Investment Review of โChronobankโ and assigned it a โStableโ ranking in terms of investment attractiveness; it should be noted that the project may be of particular interest to investors focused on long-term investments.
Read more in the report: http://icorating.com/project/23/ChronoBank
Hi icorating. The ""Advantages" section of your report says:
Quote
The presence of a large user base from Edway Group (about 400,000 people) creates a foundation on which to test ideas and first-introduced concepts to the market without the added problems that come with finding consumers services.
You think that that 400,000 people are consumers ย - that is, those who pay money. But in ChronoBank project they are those who receive money. ย Proof: Edway Group is a "LOC" on the ย scheme from ChronoBank's Whitepaper:
So Edway Group (and its 400,000 workers) is not a "consumer" but "provider" (of labour force).
And it is really a big problem for a ChronoBank project to find a consumers (those, who consume labour force and pay afterwards currently), as ChronoBank whants them to pay for LHT beforehand (before the work is done).
Question: will you correct your mistake, and will you change your Chronobank project ranking (โStableโ) ?
