[edited out]
From your explanation I've begin to grasp the meaning of lump sum quite well and how I can use it, from your explanation a guy has a weekly investment of 100$ per week for the next six months of his salary which is about 2600$ and then an extra income that or amount that he could also use to invest about 6k as you said, if the person wanted to lump sum, he would be investing or buying immediately with that amount irrespective of the market condition, I've also seen from some of your older Comment when someone that maybe is just starting out his investment and feels that he is too far away or starting late might just want to start with a little bit of aggression by front loading his investment with a lump sum buy and then continue his normal weekly DCA.
That is correct, and if you lump sum (or front load) right away, then you run a risk that the BTC price might go down, so you can either supplement your having had front-loaded (at a higher than the subsequent dipped price) by continuing to DCA while the prices ended up being lower or to have some extra that had been set aside to be able to buy on dips (that you had not known were going to happen but that you kept the extra money, just in case the dips happened, and they did end up happening so you use some or all of it to buy more BTC).
Example let's say I want to start investing right now in bitcoin and I have a monthly income of 1000$(it's assumption figures) and I decide that I want to invest about 300$ from that amount into a weekly DCA investment which should be about 75$ weekly invested in bitcoin and then I also had some cash from my savings that I also wanted to use to invest in bitcoin maybe to give myself some kind of head start and the money was about 3000$ and I decide to use 1500$ to invest right away, that is what a lump sum buying would mean.
Yes.. that is an accurate description. The extra $1,500 that is used to buy BTC right away would be considered lump sum investing and/or perhaps even front loading your investment at the current price that may or may not be going up, but the front loading/lump sum investment is a kind of preparation for up and a kind of insurance for up, just in case the BTC price does not come down, you are prepared for up by employing the lump sum. And, so yeah, from your $3k, you can choose any amount of that and call it lump summing, especially if it is higher than your regular DCA amount.. and perhaps if it is higher than the whole amount that you are going to put in for the month.. It is not exactly clear how much it would need to be in order to consider it a lump sum, but under that facts that you describe it seems to be a lump sum.. and maybe even if it was as low as $500 it could still be a lump sum, even though in that hypothetical, you are already planning to DCA $300 per month (at $75 per week).
A guy who has no bitcoin is not prepared for up. A guy who is a low coiner might feel himself without enough bitcoin, but he might already be investing as much as his finances and psychology permit him to invest, so in that case he is not a low coiner who is fighting the idea of bitcoin, and so there could be low coiners who really are not very passionate about bitcoin that they might be like a no coiner who is against bitcoin, so those guys would not invest, but it is difficult to call a low coiner as being against bitcoin, since the fact that he has some coins means that he is not likely completely against bitcoin, even if he might be skeptical of it and lacking passion in terms of the level of his investment into it.
~Snip
Everyone will respect other people's views on trading and I also really understand the views you give on short-term trading. Because for traders in the short term it has to be like that because they are looking for shorter periods of time in targeting profits than traders in the long term who are more focused on large amounts of profit over a longer period of time in certain market trends.
Holders in the long term are not worthy of being called long-term traders, they are investors. There are differences between traders and investors, some of the differences are the time frame they need to make profits and their plans.
That is an interesting way of framing the matter BITCOIN4X. So yeah investors would most likely be having a longer timeline, and in regards to profits, sure everyone prefers to be in profits, yet long term investors are not focusing narrowly on profits and they may not really know if they are going to be in profits 10 years or more down the road... They would like to be in profits and they hope to be in profits, but they are still investing whether or not they are going to be in profits and willing to live with the consequences in either direction, and yeah sure the better case scenario is to be in profits down the road, and they had chosen their investment (in this case bitcoin) with a presumption that it has good odds of being in profits and also that bitcoin is an asymmetric bet which means there are some reasonable odds that it could be multitudes and/or magnitudes in profits, and so if they weigh the possibility of going to zero and weigh the possibilities of various upside scenarios, the calculation shows that it is better to invest into their investment (in this case bitcoin) rather than not investing.
So maybe the odds that you come to calculate might look something like the below that in 10 years BTC will:
1) Go to zero (or less than $10) (and not recover) - less than 1%
2) Go to a price that is between $10 and $1k (and not recover) - less than 5%
3) Go to a price that is between $1k and $10k (and not recover) - less than 8%
4) Go to a price that is between $10k and $35k (and not recover) - less than 9%
5) Go to a price that is between $35k and below the current price ($66k-ish) (and not recover) - less than 10%
6) Go to a price that is between the current price ($66k-ish) and $150k (and get stuck there) - around 10%
7) Go to a price that is between $150k and $500k (and get stuck there) - around 12.5%
8 ) Go to a price that is between $500k and $1m (and get stuck there) - around 12.5%
9) Go to a price that is between $1m and $2m (and get stuck there) - around 12.5%
10) Go to a price that is between $2m and $10m (and get stuck there) - around 12.5%
11) Go to a price that is higher $10m - around 7%
These ways of framing probabilities and price ranges for a 10-year timeline might not be exactly correct (because I am just kind of making up the numbers and the framing and trying to give a kind of possibility that I am considering off the top of my head), but we can still consider something like this as possibilities and to determine how much we might want to invest into bitcoin base on our own assignment of such numbers. And, yeah of course the BTC price is not likely to get stuck in any of the price ranges that I list (especially in 10 years), but we might just be trying to get some kind of an idea where the BTC price might be 10 years from now.
You may notice that if we add up all of the scenarios we have 100% because it is meant to cover all of the possibilities of where the BTC price might end up 10 years from now.
And if we measure the downside scenarios from the current price, we have 33% and then there is just a matter of various degrees of upside scenarios that from the list, we might consider to be 67%.. depending upon which scenario but the upside scenarios add up to 67% with varying ideas of where the BTC price might land in the next 10 years-ish, so we can develop further some of our BTC investment ideas and we can tailor our BTC investment in accordance with our current projections about possibilities of BTC prices into the future (in this case the next 10 years from today - or whatever alternative timeline that we might want to assign prices).
By the way, I personally am more comfortable with assigning the 200-WMA to future valuations (rather than BTC spot price), but still we can measure the BTC price however we like.
And, of course, how the future plays out could help us to hone and to tweak our projections about BTC price, but we still have an outlook that is within ideas (framed in terms of probabilities that we have assigned) about how we might be thinking about bitcoin right now (at this particular moment regarding what might happen in the next 10 years), perhaps our ideas are guesses or maybe they are based on from where we came that helps us to assign probabilities to where we might be going in the next 10 years... and 5 years from now, we can make a new listing of probabilities for the next 10 years from that point.. or whatever, we can make a new listing of probabilities, whenever we feel like it and based on any kind of changes in our presumptions about what the numbers might be and if something in the real world might have changed some of our presumptions (that therefore affect our assignments of probabilities to a 10-year timeline or whatever timeline that we might choose to entertain).